Chis
Posts: 13
Joined: 16/12/2005
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicals So..let me get this right: once upon a time there was this comic hero called Batman because he dressed up like --er,, a bat (though why anyone should want to look like these ugly little devils who tend to hang upside down and carry rabies is beyond me) Anyway,Hollywood-which has largely sold its soul to the illiterate nonesense that are American comics (Those of British origin tend to be more literate with written stories and believable heroes without super powers) has finally run the "bat" idea into the ground and nowadays-although the guy still runs around being generally "batty" has become - "A KNIGHT!!! WOW! Well good for hiim! And yes,the late jazz player could call himself "Duke" Ellington if he liked- but I mean come on people! You must see that your being sold old wine in a new bottle here? Since when was this guy kn ighted? (He can't be an yway hes an American!) Are you just jesting!? If not, sssssssh. If you don’t like Batman or the Batman films why bother posting here? You are missing the point and sound like a over opinionated old woman who doesn’t understand what she’s talking about, which you clearly don’t regarding why he is also referred to as the Dark Knight. By your username you like musicals, fair enough, I hate them! but you don’t see me posting in forums about musicals, just because they aren’t my cup and tea and cant stand them doesn’t mean no one else isn’t allowed to enjoy them. Back on topic. The suit looks exactly the same as the last film to me, which is a bit too busy and not as mean & intimidating as the Batman begins suit. Though its not bad enough to ruin anything and it makes sense for the actor to be able to move faster and more flexible. On another note im glad Nolan isn’t changing Banes audio, I understood him fine from trailer & prologue, no need to possibly ruin Hardy’s performance just because some people cant pay attention.
|