Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

RE: RE:

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie News >> RE: RE: Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: RE: - 26/11/2011 11:38:48 PM   
Emyr Thy King


Posts: 2153
Joined: 13/4/2006
From: The Grid
quote:

ORIGINAL: edjones95

@boardbluekoala. I've seen those films, everyone has but not everyone has seen layer cake...


There's nothing like spilt jam..


_____________________________

"This whole imbroglio is epiphenomenal"...."demigogic faux egalitarianism" - Will Self

(in reply to edjones95)
Post #: 31
Q should now be about weapons not gadgets... - 27/11/2011 1:20:36 AM   
Blyman

 

Posts: 101
Joined: 11/5/2008
Fine actor but if they insist on bringing Q back I think it should be a hard b**tard actor that can convince as an SAS equivalent, who brings Bond up to speed on weapons, not a tech nerd showing him the latest iPhone app. That would fit better with the excellent gritty feel that the franchise has found.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 32
Q should now be about weapons not gadgets... - 27/11/2011 1:55:15 AM   
Blyman

 

Posts: 101
Joined: 11/5/2008
Fine actor but if they insist on bringing Q back I think it should be a hard b**tard actor that can convince as an SAS equivalent, who brings Bond up to speed on weapons, not a tech nerd showing him the latest iPhone app. That would fit better with the excellent gritty feel that the franchise has found.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 33
Interesting - 27/11/2011 2:01:53 AM   
FridayJack1


Posts: 19
Joined: 26/4/2011
From: The Dark Side
Interesting choice! Awesome! :D

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 34
thank god they ditched Cleese - 27/11/2011 5:46:15 PM   
leroythemasochist

 

Posts: 763
Joined: 1/9/2006
From: The Point
utterly awful git that he was. the Bond films hit bottom again when they had bmws and basil fawlty being 'hilarious'. even when they got an aston clesse was still there being a twat!
i agree with many here, let's keep bond the hard bastard that Craig has done so well to reintroduce so let's do the weapon thing, not pair of sunglasses that let him see through girl's skirts.
basically Mr Mendes, make this better than CR (which was a 10/10 movie) and make it better than QoS (about a 7) and most of all MAKE IT A BONE CRUNCHER!

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 35
good, bad or just ugly - 28/11/2011 9:24:42 AM   
blindfold

 

Posts: 108
Joined: 29/4/2006
Oh good gofd no! Casting way too young - and 10 bucks she's he uses a posh accent.

I suspect they are doing this to get in with younger audiences (have they Lucas'd the franchise!)

I saw this guy playing Hamlet on stage as a whiney/crybaby (IE- not a very good version at all).

But maybe someone in the writing department has an ace up their sleeve and this is planned, and not inserted via the producers. Time will tell!

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 36
RE: good, bad or just ugly - 28/11/2011 11:46:18 AM   
buffster28


Posts: 1164
Joined: 30/6/2011
From: STAFFS
that's my only problem that they've cast someone younger. i'm sure they'll go more realistic with the gadgets.

_____________________________

" driver picks the music, shotgun shuts his cakehole "

(in reply to blindfold)
Post #: 37
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie News >> RE: RE: Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.031