quote:

ORIGINAL: burtbondy

The only problem its going to have is that its going to be as stupid as the first two.

quote:

ORIGINAL: burtbondy

The only problem its going to have is that its going to be as stupid as the first two.

quote:

ORIGINAL: burtbondy

Nope, you're judgeing my comment against batman to be the dumbest comment ever made therefore in you're book batman is the  pinnacle of all intelligence.Why don't you turn your computer off now and have a little lie down before you become more confused.

quote:

ORIGINAL: elab49

Not rating the first 2 Nolan Batmans highly and just saying isn't necessarily trolling - I'd rate them boring and decentish but overlong respectively, myself.

But, Burtbondy, that can be done without namecalling and attacking other posters - so please moderate your posting style, thank you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: smcdonagh

The more I hear, the more I think this could be Nolan's first misfire.



8 years later?

Depends on the story reason for it


Batman during the day?

Perfectly reasonable: BB...crims operate at night, Batman attacks them from the shadows...TDK, the crims meet in broad daylight to avoid Batman...TDKR: Crims in total control of Gotham, not scared of anything, shows of criminal strength in broad daylight, on the streets. Metaphorically, Batman's character has slowly emerged from the shadows, from the beginning of the trilogy, perhaps during TDKR emerging fully, to be seen in the light by Gotham Citizens, as the good guy, who no longer has to hide in the shadows because by this time, he's no longer a shadowy figure to Gotham, he can fight criminals in the open now, and has to, because they don;t hide either?




Catwoman?

Depends on the story reason for her inclusion and the fact she's a 'cat burglar' who if seen briefly, in shadow or silhouette, will appear to have 'cat ears' because of how part of her mask looks when flipped up. She doesn't have to be the, well purring slut character of previous incarnations and can get the nickname for the reasons previously suggested. Whether these are the reasons, who knows, but they definitely fit the realism of the films so far.

I'm getting the vibe that Nolan is moving away from the reality perspective that made the first two work. This could be a huge disappointment! Too much expectation.

The 'reality' of the world of the film could be a long, long way away from where it previously was if criminals have, for example been effectively running gotham for eight years, it could resemble a surreal hell on earth with no connection to 'mainstream' society, just like certain lawless, gang run, parts of very large cities. And let's not forget the effect on Gotham of one baddie eho played by his own rules. Eight years of that being the norm could provide the finale with a hell of a backdrop

quote:

ORIGINAL: smcdonagh

The more I hear, the more I think this could be Nolan's first misfire. 8 years later? Batman during the day? Catwoman? I'm getting the vibe that Nolan is moving away from the reality perspective that made the first two work. This could be a huge disappointment! Too much expectation.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Emyr Thy King

The only thing that I've raised an eyebrow at is the eight-year gap. I think four years would be enough, but then it's premature to pass further comment seeing as we don't know the full story. Jim's right though, it could provide us with some interesting developments. Re-construction of Wayne Manor, further upgrading of the Bat Cave. Greater accrual of weapons and equipment for Batman's arsenal. Plus we'll see Gotham's decay with Batman's absence and perhaps the result of the power vacuum that's now been filled due to the Joker's actions.