st3veebee
Posts: 2354
Joined: 3/9/2006 From: 9303 Lyon Drive
|
THE GOOD: -Looks amazing -Sound is exquisite -Tactical gameplay means intense team fights -Decent map selection with huge islands and small urban areas -Nice gun selection -Nice community online -decent-great fun vehichles THE BAD: -Server issues means you can take a while to get a decent game going (this is improving however) -Rubbish SP -Co-Op really could have been better -Classes are so badly chosen and overpowered/underpowered its mildly amusing -While nothing like bad, gameplay could have been smoother -Easier for noobs (God I hate that word) to get into than MW I think both MW3 and BF3 coinicide nicely together. You want your gameplay frantic full of rambo-like manoevres, varied game modes and customizable classes? Go for MW. You prefer a team-based tactical shooter with great graphics, vehichles and huge inhabited maps? Go for BF3 Overall I find BF3 easier but it has to be the better game this year. 4.5/5
_____________________________
Latest Films: Two days in New York: 4/5 Prometheus: 3.5/5 Abe Lincoln: VH 3/5 Twin Peaks: FWWM 3.5/5
|