Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

Film is dead - production of film cameras to end

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie News >> Film is dead - production of film cameras to end Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 17/10/2011 1:47:41 PM   
dreddhead123

 

Posts: 282
Joined: 23/7/2010
quote:

technology website Creative Cow reports that the three major manufacturers of motion picture film cameras — Aaton, ARRI and Panavision — have all ceased production of new cameras within the last year, and will only make digital movie cameras from now on.


http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/r_i_p_the_movie_camera_1888_2011/singleton/

quote:

One of the first motion-picture film cameras was designed by Louis Le Prince in 1888. It still exists with the National Media Museum, England. Le Prince employed paper bands and celluloid film from John Carbutt and or Blair & Eastman in 1¾ inch width. The first motion picture camera that actually worked was created by Thomas Alva Edison.


RIP film 1888 - 2011
Post #: 1
RE: Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 17/10/2011 2:40:04 PM   
Spaldron


Posts: 10487
Joined: 6/10/2006
From: Chair
Well that's brightened up my day. Inevitable but sad.

_____________________________

And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts
And I looked and behold, a pale horse
And his name that sat on him was Death
And Hell followed with him.

(in reply to dreddhead123)
Post #: 2
RE: Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 17/10/2011 3:23:16 PM   
JIm R

 

Posts: 9185
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Surrey
Think of the cutting of costs people, it means more Uwe Boll films

(in reply to Spaldron)
Post #: 3
RE: Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 17/10/2011 3:48:31 PM   
shool


Posts: 9612
Joined: 24/3/2006
From: In The Pipe, Five by Five.
Lets face it most things are shot on digital these days and no-one can tell the difference.

did you cry when people stopped making VHS?

_____________________________

Invisio Text for Spoilers
[ color=#F1F1F1 ] Spoiler text [ /color ] , remove spaces between square brackets

"No one knows what it means, but it's provocative... It gets the people going!"

(in reply to JIm R)
Post #: 4
RE: Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 17/10/2011 4:06:32 PM   
Spaldron


Posts: 10487
Joined: 6/10/2006
From: Chair
quote:

ORIGINAL: shool

Lets face it most things are shot on digital these days and no-one can tell the difference.

did you cry when people stopped making VHS?


There's a big difference between what format a film is shot on and on what format we watch it on at home. And tbh most films are probably still shot on film even if they are then digitally transferred in post but I acknowledge those numbers are getting smaller. Chris Nolan and JJ Abrams still use film.

EDIT: And it is possible to tell the difference between film and digital. Film still looks better imo.

< Message edited by Spaldron -- 17/10/2011 4:08:11 PM >


_____________________________

And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts
And I looked and behold, a pale horse
And his name that sat on him was Death
And Hell followed with him.

(in reply to shool)
Post #: 5
RE: Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 17/10/2011 4:29:42 PM   
Angelus


Posts: 721
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Black Mesa
Film isn't dead. Not yet, anyway. If it wasn't good business for Kodak and Fuji to continue manufacturing motion picture film stock, they wouldn't do it.

Edit: Plus, I'm sure there are plenty of perfectly good film cameras out there. They won't all stop working at once.


< Message edited by Angelus -- 17/10/2011 4:33:58 PM >


_____________________________

And who are you, the proud lord said, that I must bow so low?

(in reply to Spaldron)
Post #: 6
RE: Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 17/10/2011 4:40:24 PM   
Darth Marenghi


Posts: 2948
Joined: 10/10/2010
From: Manchester
Someone should check in on directorscut - y'know, just to see if he's okay.

_____________________________

Invisible Text for SPOILERS: "color=#F1F1F1" Spoiler text "/color" , then change the quotation marks to square brackets.


(in reply to Angelus)
Post #: 7
RE: Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 17/10/2011 4:51:58 PM   
Emyr Thy King


Posts: 2153
Joined: 13/4/2006
From: The Grid
quote:

ORIGINAL: shool
did you cry when people stopped making VHS?


That's a bit sharp.

I think the more types of film used, the more diversity in terms of screen quality we'll have.


_____________________________

"This whole imbroglio is epiphenomenal"...."demigogic faux egalitarianism" - Will Self

(in reply to shool)
Post #: 8
RE: Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 17/10/2011 5:20:02 PM   
Darth Marenghi


Posts: 2948
Joined: 10/10/2010
From: Manchester

quote:

ORIGINAL: Emyr Thy King

quote:

ORIGINAL: shool
did you cry when people stopped making VHS?


That's a bit sharp.



Indeed - a rather silly post, shool. VHS was simply one not-very high quality home format that was inevitably going to be replaced by something with higher fidelity. This is one of the biggest changes to cinema in its history.


_____________________________

Invisible Text for SPOILERS: "color=#F1F1F1" Spoiler text "/color" , then change the quotation marks to square brackets.


(in reply to Emyr Thy King)
Post #: 9
RE: Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 17/10/2011 5:24:34 PM   
Spaldron


Posts: 10487
Joined: 6/10/2006
From: Chair
Someone switch on the Dpp signal.

_____________________________

And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts
And I looked and behold, a pale horse
And his name that sat on him was Death
And Hell followed with him.

(in reply to Darth Marenghi)
Post #: 10
RE: Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 17/10/2011 5:49:41 PM   
Deviation


Posts: 26908
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Enemies of Film HQ
Which is the last movie to be made on film? I remember reading that Uncle Bonmee who can Recall his past Lives was one of the last, if so, what a way to go.


_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dpp1978
There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement.

quote:


ORIGINAL: elab49
I really wish I could go down to see Privates

(in reply to Spaldron)
Post #: 11
RE: Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 17/10/2011 5:51:56 PM   
Emyr Thy King


Posts: 2153
Joined: 13/4/2006
From: The Grid
DPP signal (click)


< Message edited by Emyr Thy King -- 17/10/2011 5:52:30 PM >


_____________________________

"This whole imbroglio is epiphenomenal"...."demigogic faux egalitarianism" - Will Self

(in reply to Spaldron)
Post #: 12
RE: Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 17/10/2011 5:58:01 PM   
Spaldron


Posts: 10487
Joined: 6/10/2006
From: Chair
quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation

Which is the last movie to be made on film? I remember reading that Uncle Bonmee who can Recall his past Lives was one of the last, if so, what a way to go.


Super 8 was shot on film. As is TDKR currently in production as far as I'm aware.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Emyr Thy King

DPP signal (click)



That's the one.

_____________________________

And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts
And I looked and behold, a pale horse
And his name that sat on him was Death
And Hell followed with him.

(in reply to Deviation)
Post #: 13
RE: Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 17/10/2011 7:25:15 PM   
Dpp1978


Posts: 1007
Joined: 2/4/2006
As Angelus noted the cameras which exist won't suddenly self destruct. Properly maintained they should happily work for as long as anyone needs them to.

In any case it isn't like there is much further film cameras can be taken. They have pretty much reached their technological zenith. Improvements in film stock and lenses, which I'm assuming will continue is far more important than new camera bodies.

Look at it this way. Arguably the best ever 35mm stills camera ever made was the Leica M3. It was made between 1955 and 1967. A good one on the second hand market would cost you about a grand without lenses. If you put the latest Kodak stock in it and know how to use it you will be able to take pictures which equal or better anything from a digital SLR. If you were to move up to a vintage medium format camera (like a Hasselblad 500C, which are ridiculously cheap for what they are) you will blow any prosumer digital camera out of the water.

Similarly a vintage motion picture film camera with modern lenses and stock will perform favourably with a digital camera.

Digital motion picture cameras are only now approaching the quality of film based ones. If the reports are to be believed the new one from Sony might be the first to offer true 4K resolution which is a massive milestone. RED, whose cameras are being used extensively in Hollywood, not least on The Hobbit, has to fudge its numbers a little when it claims true 4K resolution. This is important as 4K is widely regarded as the upper resolution limit for standard 35mm motion picture film.

Of course the effort required to get results on old film cameras (no autofocus, no automatic metering, you have to wait 'till you get the negatives back to see if you got the exposure right; none of this LCD screen to check and adjust your shots malarkey) is far far higher, so for most people not worth the effort.

This brings me to what will be the death of film. Most up and coming photographers, be they working in still or motion pictures, will only experience digital. It is very easy to go from film to digital. I'm not sure the reverse is true. Give it a generation or so and film capture will be for considered artistic effect only, much as black and white is now.

That's if the Hollywood bean counters don't kill it off on financial grounds first. This isn't the death of film, but it is a nail in its coffin.

(in reply to Spaldron)
Post #: 14
RE: Film is dead - production of film cameras to end - 18/10/2011 9:14:41 AM   
JIm R

 

Posts: 9185
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Surrey
quote:

ORIGINAL: Spaldron

quote:

ORIGINAL: shool

Lets face it most things are shot on digital these days and no-one can tell the difference.

did you cry when people stopped making VHS?


There's a big difference between what format a film is shot on and on what format we watch it on at home. And tbh most films are probably still shot on film even if they are then digitally transferred in post but I acknowledge those numbers are getting smaller. Chris Nolan and JJ Abrams still use film.

EDIT: And it is possible to tell the difference between film and digital. Film still looks better imo.


The difference is about £30k in transfer costs

(in reply to Spaldron)
Post #: 15
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie News >> Film is dead - production of film cameras to end Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.063