Dpp1978
Posts: 1007
Joined: 2/4/2006
|
As Angelus noted the cameras which exist won't suddenly self destruct. Properly maintained they should happily work for as long as anyone needs them to. In any case it isn't like there is much further film cameras can be taken. They have pretty much reached their technological zenith. Improvements in film stock and lenses, which I'm assuming will continue is far more important than new camera bodies. Look at it this way. Arguably the best ever 35mm stills camera ever made was the Leica M3. It was made between 1955 and 1967. A good one on the second hand market would cost you about a grand without lenses. If you put the latest Kodak stock in it and know how to use it you will be able to take pictures which equal or better anything from a digital SLR. If you were to move up to a vintage medium format camera (like a Hasselblad 500C, which are ridiculously cheap for what they are) you will blow any prosumer digital camera out of the water. Similarly a vintage motion picture film camera with modern lenses and stock will perform favourably with a digital camera. Digital motion picture cameras are only now approaching the quality of film based ones. If the reports are to be believed the new one from Sony might be the first to offer true 4K resolution which is a massive milestone. RED, whose cameras are being used extensively in Hollywood, not least on The Hobbit, has to fudge its numbers a little when it claims true 4K resolution. This is important as 4K is widely regarded as the upper resolution limit for standard 35mm motion picture film. Of course the effort required to get results on old film cameras (no autofocus, no automatic metering, you have to wait 'till you get the negatives back to see if you got the exposure right; none of this LCD screen to check and adjust your shots malarkey) is far far higher, so for most people not worth the effort. This brings me to what will be the death of film. Most up and coming photographers, be they working in still or motion pictures, will only experience digital. It is very easy to go from film to digital. I'm not sure the reverse is true. Give it a generation or so and film capture will be for considered artistic effect only, much as black and white is now. That's if the Hollywood bean counters don't kill it off on financial grounds first. This isn't the death of film, but it is a nail in its coffin.
|