Sway
Posts: 8878
Joined: 30/9/2005 From: Albuquerque
|
Just back from seeing this and I'm still buzzing. I'm still unsure as to whether it's a 4 or 5 star film though - for about 3/4 of the film I'd say it's a solid 4, which is pushed up to 5 in the last quarter when it really comes into its own. The fight scenes are insane. Short, intense bursts with sweaty, powerful limbs flailing and throwing lightening kicks and punches faster than you can keep up with. Hardy and his Himalayan sized shoulders is as you would expect - feral, edgy, intense and brilliant to watch. But I'd say it's really Joel Edgerton's film as his character Brendan balances out his current economic problems/family life with his darker past. It might be easier to heap your sympathy on Hardy's Tommy initially, but when it comes down to it I think Brendan, who has far more to lose, gains the deeper respect. Tommy it seems is out there to prove something to himself, to confront his past in a physical manner. Brendan is fighting to keep hold of what he already has, and thats where my sympathies lay. **********SPOILERS ************* I was really pleased at the ending too - I was worried initially they were going to cop out and let Tommy win because he was the more ruthless and bulked of the two. And then when his shoulder went, I thought Brendan's character was going to cop out by not fighting him properly. I was silently urging him to get stuck into Tommy knowing if the tables had been turned, Tommy wouldn't have given it a second thought. The following is from a post I made in the other 'unoffical' thread and was in response to thetruth suggesting Tommy is the harder character to sympathise with. Thought I may aswell add this part in here. ******SPOILERS******* I don't think Tommy is a hard character to sympathise with at all - infact I think entirely the opposite, I think the majority of people will sympathise with him more. And I can understand why: broken home, alcoholic father, non-existent relationship with a brother who he believes betrayed him. He's a broken man, in a lot of pain, and that's very clear from the scenes with his father and the fight scenes. But my thoughts are that he is out there trying to prove something to himself. He's physically fighting his dark past. Whereas with Brendan, well, he could easily have gone down the same route dark path as his brother (and father) - drink, drugs, but he didn't, and he made something of himself through a lot of hard work. And now he's fighting to keep hold of what he's already achieved. It's too easy to look at the situation and think 'well he's got everything, why should we give him any sympathy?', but like I said in my original post, when Tommy joined the tournament he had nothing to lose. Brendan had everything to lose. But it was a case of damned if you do/damned if you don't - he could have lost everything had he not entered the tournament. But equally, he was taking a huge risk by entering the tournament. Perhaps sympathy is the incorrect term here, I think respect is more appropriate. Brendan commands my respect more so than Tommy. But certainly Tommy's raw pain is a large driving force of the film and really makes the final scenes what they are.
< Message edited by Sway -- 23/9/2011 5:29:19 PM >
_____________________________
"I am not in danger, Skyler. I AM the danger! A guy opens his door and gets shot and you think that of me? No. I am the one who knocks!"
|