Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

Syriana

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> Syriana Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Syriana - 27/2/2006 4:59:47 AM   
Empire Admin

 

Posts: 26334
Joined: 29/6/2005
Post your comments on this article
Post #: 1
- 27/2/2006 12:07:56 PM   
taz_e


Posts: 355
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Somewhere between Life and Death
Modern cinema meets classic history

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 2
Thank God for grown up film-making. - 4/3/2006 2:47:04 PM   
VincentHanna


Posts: 936
Joined: 3/10/2005
From: 30 minutes walk from Manchester city centre.
I pray that more movies are made like this that also get pushed to such a wide audience instead of the usual derivative, insipid stuff that fills multiplexes today.
It's intelligent, it makes you think about what's going on and it's extremely relevant to the world we live in today. The whole cast are excellent, there's not a bad performance from any of them.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 3
Fantastic - 4/3/2006 3:56:34 PM   
Ethanial


Posts: 2923
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Perpendicular Universe London
More films need to be like this, Crash was great as it jumped well, and this is better. The end was great, but a little sad, but in general, amazing.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 4
The trailer ruins it. - 4/3/2006 4:47:40 PM   
Nandroid

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 6/1/2006
This is a classic example of when the trailer for a motion picture tells the audience way too much! Most of the hard-hitting dialogue from the film is included in the trailer, and the images that are used in the trailer completely tarnish scenes in the actual film that are supposed to be shocking or suspenseful.
It is a very intelligent film, but I did not enjoy it. It seemed to plod along at an incredibly slow pace and never really got out of first gear for me. Basically, because of what I saw on the trailer, there was no suspense or narrative tension because I was just waiting for certain images to play out.
The acting and script is brilliant, and this is well worth watching, as it is very topical and deals with important issues that affect all of us.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 5
Syriana - 4/3/2006 7:52:51 PM   
lyyyle

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 4/3/2006
in my opinion this was one of the most boring and isignificant film i've ever seen, unless you want to waste £4 going to see it i would really advise you to steer well clear

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 6
RE: Syriana - 4/3/2006 8:54:02 PM   
nybras


Posts: 307
Joined: 27/12/2005
From: In The Zone
I went to see it today and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Though as said above it never did get out of first gear but films like this are not meant to be rushed and can be analyzed too much. It is based on so many evens around the world and this is giving us a little insight into what really is going on.
I thought the performance from George was unusual as we see more of him playing the cool, sophisticated type character; remind me of Richard Burton in his glory days.
But a film like this and traffic are one I could watch two, three times a year. The script is well balanced and I like the way it’s shot. The colours change when ever they change to the characters in other locations.

The ending was unexpected.

_____________________________

MacBook Pro
Mac OS X
2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
2 GB 667 MHz SDRAM
Pro Tools 7

(in reply to lyyyle)
Post #: 7
Important movie - 4/3/2006 9:15:44 PM   
avidmoviewatcher

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 4/3/2006
Kudos to the writer/director and those brave individuals who partcipated in the making of this movie! It's high time we had an accurate portrayal of what really goes on in the middle east. Everyone should go see it.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 8
Syriana - 5/3/2006 10:22:43 PM   
Philconcannon

 

Posts: 135
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: London
This is quickly becoming the year of George Clooney. After the rapturous acclaim which greeted his Goodnight, and Good Luck, he has followed it up by co-producing and starring in Syriana, another ultra-serious, politically-driven film. These combined efforts have garnered a number of Oscar nominations and people have been falling over themselves to bestow the highest praise on Clooney for his intelligence, bravery and vision.

In the publicity which has surrounded both Goodnight, and Good Luck and Syriana, Clooney has stated in a number of interviews that he aspires to make the kind of films produced by directors like Sidney Lumet, Alan J Pakula and Sydney Pollack in the early 70's. However, there is a big difference between those films and Syriana which prevents Stephen Gaghan's film from reaching those heights. Films like Three Days of the Condor, Network and The Parallax View all made their points while also managing to make narrative sense and maintain the viewer's interest; something Syriana fails to do.

Stephen Gaghan won an Oscar for adapting the Channel 4 miniseries Traffik for Stephen Soderbergh, and Syriana is a similarly multi-stranded affair. Once again Gaghan attempts to weave together the stories of a number of disparate characters, with the multinational oil industry providing the connecting thread. There's Bob Barnes (Clooney), a jaded CIA field agent working in the Middle East who begins to question the morality of his actions. We are also introduced to Bryan Woodman (Matt Damon), an oil broker who takes advantage of a personal tragedy to become the personal advisor to an Arab prince (Alexander Siddig). Elsewhere, Bennett Holiday (Jeffrey Wright) is a lawyer charged with investigating the legitimacy of a merger between two US oil giants; and if all that wasn't enough then there's also a subplot concerning two unemployed Pakistani youths who become involved with a group of Islamic extremists.

In addition to that, Gaghan manages to squeeze in roles for Chris Cooper, Christopher Plummer and Tim Blake-Nelson (overacting again) as three of the shady businessmen involved in this merger; Amanda Peet turns up as Woodman's long-suffering wife, William Hurt appears out of nowhere as some sort of Deep Throat character, and Mark Strong has a chilling cameo.

With Traffic, Gaghan did a terrific job in adapting a very complex six-part series for the big screen, but he would have been well advised to do the opposite with Syriana. There is the potential for a great miniseries here, and the various plot strands could only have benefited from being given an hour or so in which to develop. Instead, they are all crammed into the space of two hours resulting in a stodgy, unwieldy piece of filmmaking.

Gaghan has all the right ingredients here but he has no idea how to shape them into anything resembling a cogent narrative. The story jumps from Washington to Beirut to Geneva, to various other locations, and back again with head-spinning speed; and as a result I spent the first few moments of every scene trying to figure where everyone was, who they were talking to, what they were talking about and why. After a while I began to long for the kind of clear-eyed direction Soderbergh brought to Traffic. In that film, the complex storyline was reduced to three distinct strands, featuring fully-formed characters we could develop an emotional engagement with.

There are no such characters in Syriana, just a series of ciphers and mouthpieces. We are plunged right into the action with nothing to hold onto and none of the characters here are given room to breath. It's not the actors' fault - they mostly do fine work - but it's Gaghan's habit of flitting from one subject to the next while never letting the action settle and never giving us the chance to know these people. The nominal lead, I suppose, is Clooney who has bagged an Oscar nomination for gaining weight and a beard. He's fine in the role, and his character is probably the closest thing the film has to a moral centre, although it's well into the second half before he has an attack of conscience and decides to act, and by that time the film had lost my interest.

In fact, despite all of the talented actors on show here, the only performance to really make an impact on me was provided by Mark Strong, who does more in his five-minute appearance than most of the cast are given a chance to do.

Syriana looks impressive, with Robert Elswit's hazy cinematography giving every scene an interesting look, and Gaghan has picked up an number of Soderbergh's elliptical editing effects which he employs here effectively. In fact, much of Syriana is brilliantly directed with Gaghan showing real flair in a number of scenes, but the parts never add up to a whole. Ultimately, I was left wondering what Syriana really had to say about the world we live in. We see that the oil business is corrupt, that the West is exploiting the Middle East for their own gains - but this is hardly news. I came out from the film with the same understanding of the oil business and the situation in the Middle East as I had when I went in; no more and no less.

Gaghan thankfully manages to inject some dramatic impetus into Syriana late on, resorting to the age-old 'race against time' trick to build tension in the final act. But I was so far outside the drama at that point that nothing was going to drag me back in. Syriana is a horrible mess; its depth is an illusion and it spends two long hours hopping around the globe in self-important fashion, randomly losing subplots as it travels, and never saying anything of significance. Gaghan presents us with the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle, but then keeps moving them around as we try to assemble them; and by the time he finally began putting things together in the last half hour, I just didn't care anymore.

< Message edited by Philconcannon -- 15/10/2006 6:46:24 PM >

(in reply to avidmoviewatcher)
Post #: 9
RE: Crude Oil - 6/3/2006 12:08:45 PM   
Movie Dude

 

Posts: 192
Joined: 28/11/2005
the movie was pretty good n dealt wiv an important subject: oil.
but i dont think George Clooney deserved the oscar for it, he was great but there were better nominees.
(sorry 4 going of da point)

(in reply to Philconcannon)
Post #: 10
RE: Crude Oil - 7/3/2006 9:15:42 AM   
wackojacko


Posts: 277
Joined: 3/10/2005
From: South of Heaven
Went to see this yesterday. A very good film with absolutely brilliant performances, not just from the lead roles but in particular the migrant workers from Pakistan. Their story got you thinking from the beginning until the end and was not merely a distraction but an important message to get across. I'll admit the pace is slow and sometimes confusing but stick with it and all will become clear.

_____________________________

The Haunted made me do it

(in reply to Movie Dude)
Post #: 11
Not your typical Clooney movie - 8/3/2006 2:51:38 PM   
chevychase

 

Posts: 13
Joined: 2/1/2006
I only watched this to see if Clooney was worthy of his Oscar, I was pleasently suprised by both the film and Clooneys excellent performance. I think that we have become so used to the Clooney we saw at the Oscar ceremony that you do at times forget what a damn fine actor he is as well.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 12
RE: Not your typical Clooney movie - 8/3/2006 3:24:45 PM   
jeanne


Posts: 8714
Joined: 19/12/2005
From: Gyllenhaalics anonymous
Just saw it at a press viewing and i liked it a lot. It had a great ensamble cast ( I actually liked it more than Crashs cast witch was also great). I liked the political tone of the film and really enjoyed the film as a whole. Cloony was great (still voting for Jake though) and he did earn his award. Also the thing that I found nice about this film was the fact that Matt Damon didn't irritate me like he usually does.

(in reply to chevychase)
Post #: 13
RE: Not your typical Clooney movie - 8/3/2006 5:01:02 PM   
elab49


Posts: 51635
Joined: 1/10/2005
While I did rate the film, I think there were a few problems with it.

The most obvious non-spoiler one is Damon's character. He was very good but the character itself was very obviously and artificially there solely for the purposes of exposition. And that blatant shoehorning did damage the film in my eyes.

Tim Blake Nelson, as well, seemed to be there just to voice a point of view but with no real reason apart from that.

And *spoiler* so white text

I just thought part of the ending was silly. The scary part was certainly that - the detail in the cameras and the precision of the attack (although Google Earth may start make us realise who possible that is).
 
But why did he just stand there gawping? Again, I'm not criticising the performance at all - but to get there and then, just, nothing, Silly - and simply didn't ring true.

Apart from that most of it was very interesting, although a clear departure from the book, presumably on Gaghan's own researches. The film itself didn't work anywhere near as well as Traffic did though - perhaps highlighting Soderbergh's greater talent?

Performances almost uniformly excellent. Cooper charismatic as usual, Jeffrey Wright was particularly good. I agree with the praise of Strong's cameo above. And Clooney was excellent.

_____________________________

Lips Together and Blow - blogtasticness and Glasgow Film Festival GFF13!

Films watched 2012

Annual Poll 2012 Countdown Started.

(in reply to jeanne)
Post #: 14
RE: Not your typical Clooney movie - 8/3/2006 8:16:14 PM   
Hamish


Posts: 178
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Lincs
      Writer/director Steven Gaghan certainly doesn't shy away from the big subjects in the world today. Having written the excellent drugs drama "Traffic" which Steven Soderburgh tuned to perfection, Gaghan took up the enviable task of directing his next script, another multi-level tapestry, this time concentrating on the part oil plays in global politics. The movie revolves around a merger between two American oil companies; it is through this deal that we are exposed to a whole web of corruption. Weaving around this central conceit we follow four separate characters, all of which succeed in a engaging the viewer allowing us to see the subject from a variety of angles and viewpoints. It is this variety that really enriches the political weight of the film. The story may be fictional but the basic concepts are worryingly real, bringing the morality of Western business under real scrutiny.

      The first of the four stories involves George Clooney's CIA agent Bob Barnes, it is a part that at first appears low key and somewhat uninspiring, however as the film progresses a natural ease and subtlety surfaces that is a real credit to Clooney's talent as an actor. The Oscar is fully deserved. The second story involves Bennett Holiday (Jeffrey Wright) hired by a law firm to investigate the merger between the two oil companies at the heart of Syriana's plot. Next we follow Matt Damon's Bryan Woodman, an energy analyst sent to make a deal with an Arab Prince and finally a Pakistani Muslim (Mazhar Munir) who finds himself being made redundant after the merger takes place.

       Interestingly this isn't a case of all the loose ends being tied off neatly and tidily in a shocking and surprising final reel. Syriana concentrates on the bigger picture; character interactions between the four plots are minimal. We are invited to look in on this complex web of corruption and deceit, the framework is there but the fact that we as viewers never quite understand every intricate detail and link within the narrative is actually quite potent. The characters themselves do not understand everything; it is the immersion in this world that provides the substance. The topic of oil in relation to Middle East/West relationship is presented as a huge, amoral mess and the fact that the viewer does to some extent feel dwarfed by the complexity of the issue I am sure is at least in part intended. As in "Traffic" there are no solutions offered, Syriana is insightful as oppose to creatively positive. We are invited to dwell over the world's problem and perhaps consider our own solutions if there are any.

      The most fascinating of the four plots is for me at least Matt Damon's energy analyst Woodman. He represents youth and idealistic values, he believes he can change the world and in discussions with the Prince he can see a light at the end of the tunnel. Prince Nasir is concerned with the wealth and prosperity of his country, the possibility of a peaceful future and a stable government. Woodman can see a break from Western exploitation of the area. The devastating way in which his positive outlook is brought down to the ground is perhaps the films most profound moment.

      Stylistically it is surprisingly spare, taking on bare bones documentary style as oppose to something heavily stylised. There is no iconic framing and therefore little signs of pretentiousness. We are presented with the events and are allowed to judge for ourselves which parts are profound and important. For the majority of the first half of the film the editing feels very disjointed as we chop from story to story in a seemingly random, irregular manner. It certainly lacks a sense of fluidity, but the film evens out as we get to grips with the basics of each sub-plot. This initial incoherence certainly hinders the accessibility of the film and you get the impression more could have been done to even out our entry into the various strands of narrative.

      As food for thought Syriana is extremely competent, as a political thriller it does however fall short of outstanding, the rich complexity inevitably cuts the pace to somewhere near ponderous at times and could possibly alienate viewers especially in the first half of the picture. There are few actual set pieces, as the meat of the film is in the politics. Gaghan does build a level of dramatic tension towards the end of the film which balances out the complex, information packed nature of the rest of the film surprisingly effectively. What could have becomes tiresome and excessive soon settles down as the narrative reaches conclusions that trigger you to look back upon what you have just seen with new found clarity. As with many of the more intelligent films coming to our screens in recent months the film is somewhat observational, as an entertainment package it may fall somewhat short but the experience is still extremely rewarding.

      While never matching the gloriously high standard set by "Traffic" (Solderburgh's film has far more clarity and structure.) Syriana will certainly raise a few eyebrows and as is consistent with films of this nature repeat viewings will only increase our appreciation as the more intricate details can be taken in making for an experience even more richly textured. The main purpose of the film is to get people talking and in my experience at least Syriana does just that.


< Message edited by Hamish -- 8/3/2006 8:17:09 PM >

(in reply to elab49)
Post #: 15
RE: Syriana - 9/3/2006 2:39:48 PM   
Shawlord


Posts: 546
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: The Sands, Las Vegas 1950's
If there is one thing I would say about this film it is that is has made me want to go away and read around the subject matter.  Certainly I don't think the film covered enough to get a grasp on the situation, but then with something as complex as this, no amount of movie time could ever do it justice or give the attention to detail that it needs.

_____________________________

The World is a fine place, and worth fighting for... I agree with the second part.

100 Golden Oldies Recommended by you!

(in reply to Hamish)
Post #: 16
RE: Syriana - 9/3/2006 7:15:03 PM   
riversbend


Posts: 1886
Joined: 1/11/2005
From: a goddamn bitch of an unsatisfactory situation
This film has a LOT going for it, not the least of which is the performances.  Excellent accross the board.  It was interesting in an intellectual sort of way, but I did find myself yawning and shifting around more than I usually do at the cinema.  I am not sure how the subject matter could have been covered in a film any more 'excitingly' without sacrificing realism however, and I think that they made the right decision going for slow burn. 

If you are the sort of person for whom BBC News24 and the History channel never get a look in because you can't think of anything more dull I would give Syriana a miss. Ditto if you like plots spoon fed to you.  For anyone who doesn't mind thinking while they watch, and for whom the state of the world economy is interesting, give this a go.


_____________________________

The pattern is not set. It is fluid and constantly changing.
But it will be worked out in beauty in the end.

Someone once said I was the thinking woman's man. I was just like, I hope every woman is thinking.

Beep... Perfect score... Gold star.

(in reply to Shawlord)
Post #: 17
RE: Syriana - 9/3/2006 11:33:45 PM   
King_Wah


Posts: 2348
Joined: 1/10/2005
From: Halesowen
I enjoyed the film but got a little irritated by the constant monologues from characters explaining about the oil industry. I felt a little preached at, not a film with a light touch.

However the performances were good (although I am not sure George deserved an oscar) and there was some genuine suspense. I'd give it 3/5.

_____________________________

I am big, it's the forum that got smaller.

(in reply to riversbend)
Post #: 18
Oil rich - 11/3/2006 9:14:26 PM   
Gold Digger

 

Posts: 143
Joined: 3/10/2005
From: Outside London
Critic friendly, but hardly involving. A film full of monologues. Still if you need to know how awful the world we live in is and how ruthless we all are then enjoy.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 19
Yawn... - 11/3/2006 10:56:09 PM   
antdaviesuk

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 11/3/2006
From: Burnley, Lancashire
I've never seen so many people looking at their watch.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 20
- 11/3/2006 11:56:26 PM   
Grandma Death


Posts: 396
Joined: 13/2/2006
From: London
Syriana, is always intelligent, occasionaly thrilling and overwhelmingly complicated. The vast cast and interweaving story lines prove very difficult to keep track of, and the pacing is muddled, and as a result the whole affair is somewhat soporific. Gaghan's sole aim seems to be to show how politically corrupt the american oil industry is. This would be fine if he actually invested some emotional depth into to his myriad of characters at the same time, yet they all seem strangely bland, meaning that any viewer who is not overtly political feels alienated. The performances are sturdy and there is no doubting the intelligence of the material, but any poignance this may have had is lost in Gaghan's impersonal execution. A film that lasts just over two hours shouldn't fell like a three hour plus bum number, but this does. This muddled patchwork of political angst is quickly forgetten, which is a shame as it had potential to be so much more.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 21
- 12/3/2006 12:07:28 PM   
Naweed_1


Posts: 1433
Joined: 7/1/2006
From: Birmingham
Okay but can be boring and dull at times espescially the first hour, Matt Damon and Amanda Peet were amazing as the couple who lost their child.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 22
- 12/3/2006 12:18:22 PM   
Juliette

 

Posts: 17
Joined: 19/12/2005
Just wanted to put in a good word for Alexander Siddig, who was excellent but whose performance has been overlooked by critics due to being surrounded by so many acting heavyweights.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 23
oily - 12/3/2006 8:16:09 PM   
olihiggy

 

Posts: 31
Joined: 7/1/2006
From: Sheffield
Bloody marvellous. George Clooney was superb as Bob and Matt Damon inspirational. What we did not know about the oil world we do now!! Exceptional.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 24
Syriana...Not too sure? - 13/3/2006 10:39:56 AM   
Dirtycaah

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 3/10/2005
From: London
Great beginning, great end but no middle. It knew where it wanted to go, but wasn't sure how to get there. Clooney was average and didn't deserve the oscar. And I hate films that assume good muslims are the ones who are likely to terrorise others. What crap! Terrorism has nothing to do with religion, it is just a fuel for it.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 25
RE: Crude Oil - 13/3/2006 10:42:44 AM   
Alvin Stardust


Posts: 349
Joined: 14/11/2005
From: West Midlands
quote:

ORIGINAL: Philconcannon

I was so far outside the drama at that point that nothing was going to drag me back in. Syriana is a horrible mess; its depth is an illusion and it spends two long hours hopping around the globe in self-important fashion, randomly losing subplots as it travels, and never saying anything of significance. Gaghan presents us with the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle, but then keeps moving them around as we try to assemble them; and by the time he finally began putting things together in the last half hour, I just didn't care anymore.


Spot on. Well made and acted, and a subject ripe for analysis, but as boring as hell. It joins The Hunt for Red October on my 'films I fell asleep watching' list.

_____________________________

"A coo, a coo, I just want you"

(in reply to Philconcannon)
Post #: 26
Confused? You will be! - 13/3/2006 2:10:51 PM   
Dan Howe

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 25/11/2005
What a mess this film is. It tries too hard to state its message, and just ends up being pretentious guff as a result. If you can follow the story, such as it is, then good luck to you. But I had no idea what most characters names were, let alone what their part in the plot was, so ended up not really caring about anyone. I can't believe George Clooney got Best Supporting Actor at the Oscars for this, since he just reverted to type, playing Dr Ross from ER although he was meant to be a veteran CIA field operative. I didn't buy his character at all - you don't spend years working for the CIA in Beirut with Hezbollah and be THAT naive of the true nature of your own government. Shoddy acting and writing. The only storyline and characters I cared about was the relationship between Alexander Siddig and Matt Damon, both of whom played their parts expertly, but sadly their short time on screen failed to make up for this badly constructed film. Avoid it.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 27
Solid, but..... - 15/3/2006 9:50:46 PM   
omarx

 

Posts: 150
Joined: 7/10/2005
From: Somewhere that's neither here nor there
I watched Syriana, in a FULL cinema, and I have enjoyed it very much, the film has it's pitfalls, and it is far from perfect. well lets face it ..it ain't Traffic, but........the narrative is so fragmented, and the charachter arcs are so complex, I felt it needed another 15 mins, YES YES YES..ANOTHER 15 MINS!.....to build up on motivation, especially for the (young muslim), and to explore the crooked paths the big corporations are willing to take. Unlike Munich, the film wasn't afraid of the message it was sending and I have to applaud artisis that push the envelope and try to drive home issues that have been sidlined by layers and layers of consumer television and mediocre media. as a film I would give it 3/5 on its artistic merits, as for the message it conveys, I have to give it 5...

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 28
Flacid - 19/3/2006 1:05:04 PM   
mingmong9

 

Posts: 9
Joined: 19/3/2006
This film is utter pelt. They don't tell you who anybody is nor what on Earth they are doing for the first 1hr 30 mins. The fools among you may think this film is intelligent, well it's not, it is just really obtuse and difficult to follow. 12 Monkeys was difficult to follow, but there was a purpose behind that. There is no purpose behind this drivel whatsoever. The turd acting does not help.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 29
- 20/3/2006 12:52:23 PM   
kachna_ff

 

Posts: 28
Joined: 11/10/2005
Very dissapointing. It failed to make me even slightly intersted, moved or angry. I relly couldn't care less. I didn'd expect to agree with what this movie has to say, but i at least expected to have something to think about and argue with. But i didn't get anything. Yet another movie that I wished would end long before it did. Very, very dissapointing.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> Syriana Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.170