Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

RE: CGI/Special effects in films.....

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie Musings >> RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 24/8/2011 8:19:51 PM   
porntrooper

 

Posts: 2497
Joined: 6/9/2006
From: Sheffield

quote:

ORIGINAL: Spaldron


quote:

ORIGINAL: porntrooper


quote:

ORIGINAL: pauljthomas

quote:

ORIGINAL: porntrooper

Someone mentioned aboe that although Gollum is a great peformance and although it is, at times, a great piece of effects work, it isn't perfect and certainly has it's fair share of dodgy moments.

The PotC movies have used CG brilliantly in my opinion, of course Davy Jones being the best, but there are some other really really good effects shots (I'm thinking of the shot from behind Jones on the Dutchman as it plunges below the waves and the sea washes up over the 'camera' and we're underwater with the ship. It's pretty fucking brilliant) in the second and third movie.

The use of CGI in Master & Commander is at times superb too, brilliantly subtle.

I kinda agree with Silas on the CGI work in RotS, at times it is superb, but as with most other CG heavy movies it does slip and suffer. Terminator Salvation uses some great CG work too actually, and as for all three Transformers movies, well they're pretty amazing from an effects perspective. I don't see how anyone, regardless of how much they dislike the film, could say the CG work is poor. It's busy, very very busy at times, but it is mostly flawless.


Which parts were they? I can only think of 1 when his facial features seemed odd (when Sam & Frodo spot the Oliphaunt in Two Towers), other than that-incredible!!


Having not watched them in years, I couldn't tell you where in the final two films the scenes apepar, but a couple I remember (which I think are from Two Towers) are as Gollum climbs down rocks on a sleeping Frodo and Sam, they both spring up and jump him, tying him up after scrapping with him. Some of the interaction between real world and the CG effecct just doesn't work, it doesn't feel like Gollum is there in the scene. There is a similar scene later on where Gollum is grabbing at Frodo's clothes, pulling them and begging for something, again the real world interaction just doesnt work and makes the fact that this is a CG creation jump right out. Also, at times Gollums eyes just don't look right, it sounds strange, but they have no depth to them. I can ignore it mostly, and I'd never argue that it isn't, on the whole, a great piece of effects work, but it isn't without faults. I'm planning a rewatch of LotR in the near future so it will be interesting to see how it holds up before my eyes after several years. I certainly don't class Gollum, as an effect, in the same league as Davey Jones. Davey JOnes still holds up as a great piece of CG. I can only think of a couple of shots that drew attention to the CG.


That's a fair point however you have to remember when they were doing Gollum they were in uncharted territory as in how to make a CGI character as believable as a real one, as previous to this most CGI characters looked and felt exactly like computer animated puppets. They set the bar right there and then and considering it was a new effects house with relatively inexperienced effects team compared to the likes of ILM is all the more impressive. And the fact that Andy Serkis is as well known and is still pushing the boundaries (Caeser et al) is a mark of Gollum's legacy.



Don't get me wrong, it's a great effect and I fully appreciate what Weta, Serkis and Jackson achieved with it, but it's far from flawless and doesn't spring to mind when I think of effects shots that stand the test of time, such as Davey Jones, Jurassic Park's T-Rex or the subtleties of Master & Commander. It's good yea, occasionally great, occasionally stunning, but at others it doesn't look great.

I appreciate what you say regarding legacy, but then you would also have to give Lucas his due for Jar Jar in Episode One, something which people seem reluctant to do due to their hatred of the character. I actually think King Kong is a much better example of Weta/Serkis' performance capture work. Kong is an effect that rarely slips and in certain parts of the movie (the New York finale) the CG effects work on Kong and his surroundings is stunning. I haven't seen Rise of the Apes yet, but the work their does look stunning, but even I can see areas already where it appears to slip (baby Ceaser looks a bit iffy to my eyes).

_____________________________

"I've got an idea for a special infiltration technique. It involves draining a man of his blood and replacing it with Tizer."

(in reply to Spaldron)
Post #: 31
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 2/9/2011 11:57:54 AM   
anakin solo


Posts: 1032
Joined: 28/2/2006
From: in the force
My personal favorites is the special effects for the na'vi especially grace's avatar and neytiri's are amazing, sometimes i forgot while watching the film that they weren't real. The effects for home tree coming down were amazing.

_____________________________

my ally is the force and what a powerful ally it is.

(in reply to porntrooper)
Post #: 32
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 2/9/2011 12:02:39 PM   
Timon


Posts: 14541
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Bristol
Surely the best special effects are the ones you completely don't notice?

_____________________________

"I put no stock in religion. By the word 'religion', I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called 'The Will of God'. Holiness is in right action and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves."

Twitter: @timonsingh

(in reply to DazDaMan)
Post #: 33
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 2/9/2011 12:34:45 PM   
DazDaMan


Posts: 10109
Joined: 8/9/2006
From: Penicuik - a right shithole
quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives

As impressive as Gollum was, Caeser makes him look like Jar Jar Binks.


Not entirely sure I agree with this.  I was never fully convinced that I wasn't watching Andy Serkis in a mo-cap suit.

_____________________________

You fucking fuckers are gonna do what I say or I'm going to stick my foot so far up your assholes you'll rue the day you crawled out of your mother's twat!

(in reply to horribleives)
Post #: 34
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 2/9/2011 12:51:55 PM   
Dpp1978


Posts: 1007
Joined: 2/4/2006
Copied from a thread I posted in Movie News

Kerner Optical has closed.

So what you may ask. Well for many years it operated as the Kerner Company. It was a cloak and dagger name for Industrial Light and Magic.

When ILM moved a few years ago the original facility was sold off and ran as a separate company. ILM now outsources all practical effects work and Kerner was their chief supplier.

It is a sad day as they retained the spirit of the ILM as was rather than the ILM of today.

A press release can be found here:-

http://www.kerner.com/KO/Kerner_Optical/Home.html

(in reply to DazDaMan)
Post #: 35
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 2/9/2011 1:16:48 PM   
thetruth


Posts: 1548
Joined: 3/8/2011

quote:

ORIGINAL: DazDaMan
quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives
As impressive as Gollum was, Caeser makes him look like Jar Jar Binks.
Not entirely sure I agree with this.  I was never fully convinced that I wasn't watching Andy Serkis in a mo-cap suit.

I would agree and disagree somewhat!
Caesar was much better than Gollum,but not to the point of making him Jar Jar.
Both are still flawed,Caesar less so.

_____________________________

Without love we are dead

Protect children from vile and obscene videos

(in reply to DazDaMan)
Post #: 36
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 2/9/2011 1:33:51 PM   
Hood_Man


Posts: 11270
Joined: 30/9/2005

quote:

ORIGINAL: Timon

Surely the best special effects are the ones you completely don't notice?

One of the most obvious effects I never noticed was in The Fellowship of the Ring when Gandalf gives his hat to BIlbo.

Obviously neither actor was on set at the same time but it was so smoothly done that it wasn't until earlier this year when I was watching one of the special effects docs on the EE DVD that I saw how they did it. It was a real forehead slapping moment but in my defence they did it really well

Of all the fully CGI characters though I'd have to say Davey Jones came closest to being unnoticeable. Not that I thought he was real, but to the point where I was watching it the first time thinking that some of him had to be make-up. The eyes especially I thought were Bill Nighy's, they were perfect.

(in reply to Timon)
Post #: 37
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 2/9/2011 2:16:34 PM   
Scruffybobby


Posts: 4021
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: My House
quote:

  I appreciate what you say regarding legacy, but then you would also have to give Lucas his due for Jar Jar in Episode One, something which people seem reluctant to do due to their hatred of the character. I actually think King Kong is a much better example of Weta/Serkis' performance capture work. Kong is an effect that rarely slips and in certain parts of the movie (the New York finale) the CG effects work on Kong and his surroundings is stunning. I haven't seen Rise of the Apes yet, but the work their does look stunning, but even I can see areas already where it appears to slip (baby Ceaser looks a bit iffy to my eyes).


quote:

ORIGINAL: DazDaMan

quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives

As impressive as Gollum was, Caeser makes him look like Jar Jar Binks.


Not entirely sure I agree with this.  I was never fully convinced that I wasn't watching Andy Serkis in a mo-cap suit.



For me Caesar is probably the best mocap character so far at least in terms of performance and characterisation. The problem I had though was that I have seen enough real chimps, in pictures and in the flesh, to know what a Chimp looks and moves like and in that respect he never quite convinced. The "daddy" chimp in the prison  was better in that respect.

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: elab49 (via Gizoogle)

Gentleman, please - could our crazy-ass asses leave dis thread ta gangstas wantin ta say shit bout a funky-ass bad film?



(in reply to DazDaMan)
Post #: 38
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 2/9/2011 2:19:42 PM   
Gimli The Dwarf


Posts: 73445
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Central Park Zoo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hood_Man

Of all the fully CGI characters though I'd have to say Davey Jones came closest to being unnoticeable. Not that I thought he was real, but to the point where I was watching it the first time thinking that some of him had to be make-up. The eyes especially I thought were Bill Nighy's, they were perfect.



I though the same when I first saw him. I was really shocked to find out it was all CGI. Almost did think he was real!

_____________________________

So, sir, we let him have it right up! And I have to report, sir, he did not like it, sir.

Fellow scientists, poindexters, geeks.

Yeah, Mr. White! Yeah, science!

Much more better!

(in reply to Hood_Man)
Post #: 39
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 2/9/2011 3:26:54 PM   
porntrooper

 

Posts: 2497
Joined: 6/9/2006
From: Sheffield

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gimli The Dwarf


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hood_Man

Of all the fully CGI characters though I'd have to say Davey Jones came closest to being unnoticeable. Not that I thought he was real, but to the point where I was watching it the first time thinking that some of him had to be make-up. The eyes especially I thought were Bill Nighy's, they were perfect.



I though the same when I first saw him. I was really shocked to find out it was all CGI. Almost did think he was real!


Hang the fuck on..... Davey Jone's eyes are full CG? They're not Bill Nighy's?! Well fuck...if true, I think that seals the deal. Easily the most impressive bridge of the uncanny valley I've ever seen. I had always, always thought Nighy's eyes we're the only real part, with the CG effect built around him. Wow. There is a scene in one of the films where he has Tia Dalma in a cell and his eyes are in close up in several shots during the scene and I would never have known they were CG. Double fucking wow.

_____________________________

"I've got an idea for a special infiltration technique. It involves draining a man of his blood and replacing it with Tizer."

(in reply to Gimli The Dwarf)
Post #: 40
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 2/9/2011 3:37:10 PM   
JIm R

 

Posts: 9185
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Surrey
quote:

ORIGINAL: porntrooper


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gimli The Dwarf


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hood_Man

Of all the fully CGI characters though I'd have to say Davey Jones came closest to being unnoticeable. Not that I thought he was real, but to the point where I was watching it the first time thinking that some of him had to be make-up. The eyes especially I thought were Bill Nighy's, they were perfect.



I though the same when I first saw him. I was really shocked to find out it was all CGI. Almost did think he was real!


Hang the fuck on..... Davey Jone's eyes are full CG? They're not Bill Nighy's?! Well fuck...if true, I think that seals the deal. Easily the most impressive bridge of the uncanny valley I've ever seen. I had always, always thought Nighy's eyes we're the only real part, with the CG effect built around him. Wow. There is a scene in one of the films where he has Tia Dalma in a cell and his eyes are in close up in several shots during the scene and I would never have known they were CG. Double fucking wow.


George did the blinking bit for them though.....

(in reply to porntrooper)
Post #: 41
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 2/9/2011 6:44:37 PM   
Gimli The Dwarf


Posts: 73445
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Central Park Zoo

quote:

ORIGINAL: porntrooper

Hang the fuck on..... Davey Jone's eyes are full CG? They're not Bill Nighy's?! Well fuck...if true, I think that seals the deal. Easily the most impressive bridge of the uncanny valley I've ever seen. I had always, always thought Nighy's eyes we're the only real part, with the CG effect built around him. Wow. There is a scene in one of the films where he has Tia Dalma in a cell and his eyes are in close up in several shots during the scene and I would never have known they were CG. Double fucking wow.


Talk on the subject here - http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,1212815,00.html


_____________________________

So, sir, we let him have it right up! And I have to report, sir, he did not like it, sir.

Fellow scientists, poindexters, geeks.

Yeah, Mr. White! Yeah, science!

Much more better!

(in reply to porntrooper)
Post #: 42
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 3/9/2011 9:35:53 AM   
anakin solo


Posts: 1032
Joined: 28/2/2006
From: in the force
Lord of the Rings has always had some pretty good special effects, as has the star trek movies.

_____________________________

my ally is the force and what a powerful ally it is.

(in reply to Gimli The Dwarf)
Post #: 43
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 3/9/2011 11:32:17 AM   
hatebox

 

Posts: 942
Joined: 14/2/2008
quote:

ORIGINAL: darth silas


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spaldron

Gollum.

To this day the most fully realised and groundbreaking CGI character in film.


Nope.Yoda in ROTS is the best fully realised and groundbreaking CGI character in film.

In fact ROTS is flawless when it comes to it's CGI work.


But, like all the prequels, the CGI is dull and lifeless. There's no texture to any of it and the great irony is that in making all these worlds CGI to convey their scope, the real-life actors look like they're on a small set.

(in reply to darth silas)
Post #: 44
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 3/9/2011 11:33:42 AM   
hatebox

 

Posts: 942
Joined: 14/2/2008
The LOTR CGI looks very dated now - watch any of them on blu ray via a big tv and you'll see. What saves Gollum is he has personality too. 

(in reply to DazDaMan)
Post #: 45
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 3/9/2011 11:52:22 AM   
DONOVAN KURTWOOD


Posts: 7659
Joined: 6/10/2005
From: PLANET G
i think roughly 70% of all the LOTR still looks fantastic

_____________________________

Pack your bags, we're going on a guilt trip!

(in reply to hatebox)
Post #: 46
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 3/9/2011 3:27:08 PM   
Spaldron


Posts: 10487
Joined: 6/10/2006
From: Chair
I think the arguments over how badass the CGI looks and how realistic the character feels are two different things. Ideally you want a bit of both. As said above about the prequels (particularly Yoda) looked great and photoreal but lacked any character or realism. Gollum has dated slightly over the years but still feels real. When you watch it you forget he's been created on a computer, that's why it still works. The best special effects are when you don't notice or aren't thinking about it.

_____________________________

And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts
And I looked and behold, a pale horse
And his name that sat on him was Death
And Hell followed with him.

(in reply to DONOVAN KURTWOOD)
Post #: 47
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 3/9/2011 8:38:32 PM   
thetruth


Posts: 1548
Joined: 3/8/2011

quote:

ORIGINAL: DONOVAN KURTWOOD

i think roughly 70% of all the LOTR still looks fantastic

I think that's about fair.
It is 10 years or so,and i think they have dated really well.

_____________________________

Without love we are dead

Protect children from vile and obscene videos

(in reply to DONOVAN KURTWOOD)
Post #: 48
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 3/9/2011 10:26:12 PM   
DeppBurtonAlliance


Posts: 198
Joined: 15/8/2006
Just to get it out because it's been infuriating me since I saw it: Pointless CGI - The end of Public Enemies. What. The. Fuck. Just throw some corn syrup on the man instead of horrible leaky CGI blood.

(in reply to DazDaMan)
Post #: 49
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 4/9/2011 4:26:38 PM   
DONOVAN KURTWOOD


Posts: 7659
Joined: 6/10/2005
From: PLANET G
Fast 5 had some pretty obvious CG. i was kind of surprised because a lot of people seemed to be celebrating it for its use of practical FX but the CG was quite clear to my eyes.

_____________________________

Pack your bags, we're going on a guilt trip!

(in reply to DeppBurtonAlliance)
Post #: 50
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 4/9/2011 5:15:37 PM   
st3veebee


Posts: 2354
Joined: 3/9/2006
From: 9303 Lyon Drive

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeppBurtonAlliance

Just to get it out because it's been infuriating me since I saw it: Pointless CGI - The end of Public Enemies. What. The. Fuck. Just throw some corn syrup on the man instead of horrible leaky CGI blood.


Yeah that as an oddly poor choice: completely ruined what should have been a brilliant moment.


What's funny is how awful older cgi films look on blu ray/HD tvs: i passed a Sony store recenetly and was shocked at how awful the effects in The Mummy/Returns looked

_____________________________

Latest Films:

Two days in New York: 4/5

Prometheus: 3.5/5

Abe Lincoln: VH 3/5

Twin Peaks: FWWM 3.5/5

(in reply to DeppBurtonAlliance)
Post #: 51
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 4/9/2011 5:17:29 PM   
DONOVAN KURTWOOD


Posts: 7659
Joined: 6/10/2005
From: PLANET G
see i disagree, i own both The Mummy and Mummy Returns on blu ray and think that hi def makes the FX looks amazing. Especially in the first with the mummy himself, theyre so sharp and clear.

_____________________________

Pack your bags, we're going on a guilt trip!

(in reply to st3veebee)
Post #: 52
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 4/9/2011 5:41:42 PM   
thetruth


Posts: 1548
Joined: 3/8/2011

quote:

ORIGINAL: DONOVAN KURTWOOD

see i disagree, i own both The Mummy and Mummy Returns on blu ray and think that hi def makes the FX looks amazing. Especially in the first with the mummy himself, theyre so sharp and clear.

Sharp and clear,but obvious maybe?

_____________________________

Without love we are dead

Protect children from vile and obscene videos

(in reply to DONOVAN KURTWOOD)
Post #: 53
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 4/9/2011 5:48:41 PM   
DONOVAN KURTWOOD


Posts: 7659
Joined: 6/10/2005
From: PLANET G
well yeah but it is a stephen sommers movie, the fx always were apparent, especially due to the nature of what they are. i just think hi def makes them look great

_____________________________

Pack your bags, we're going on a guilt trip!

(in reply to thetruth)
Post #: 54
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 4/9/2011 5:55:46 PM   
Spaldron


Posts: 10487
Joined: 6/10/2006
From: Chair

quote:

ORIGINAL: DONOVAN KURTWOOD

see i disagree, i own both The Mummy and Mummy Returns on blu ray and think that hi def makes the FX looks amazing. Especially in the first with the mummy himself, theyre so sharp and clear.




_____________________________

And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts
And I looked and behold, a pale horse
And his name that sat on him was Death
And Hell followed with him.

(in reply to DONOVAN KURTWOOD)
Post #: 55
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 4/9/2011 5:56:39 PM   
thetruth


Posts: 1548
Joined: 3/8/2011
The Mummy dated really quickly for me-but i agree the hi-def experience adds to the quality.
Maybe even Jar-Jar might look a bit better!

_____________________________

Without love we are dead

Protect children from vile and obscene videos

(in reply to DONOVAN KURTWOOD)
Post #: 56
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 4/9/2011 6:01:02 PM   
DONOVAN KURTWOOD


Posts: 7659
Joined: 6/10/2005
From: PLANET G

quote:

ORIGINAL: Spaldron


quote:

ORIGINAL: DONOVAN KURTWOOD

see i disagree, i own both The Mummy and Mummy Returns on blu ray and think that hi def makes the FX looks amazing. Especially in the first with the mummy himself, theyre so sharp and clear.






thats not hi def!

_____________________________

Pack your bags, we're going on a guilt trip!

(in reply to Spaldron)
Post #: 57
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 4/9/2011 6:01:34 PM   
DONOVAN KURTWOOD


Posts: 7659
Joined: 6/10/2005
From: PLANET G

quote:

ORIGINAL: thetruth

The Mummy dated really quickly for me-but i agree the hi-def experience adds to the quality.
Maybe even Jar-Jar might look a bit better!


definitely a personal choice thing this one i reckon, i really like the style of the fx used

_____________________________

Pack your bags, we're going on a guilt trip!

(in reply to thetruth)
Post #: 58
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 4/9/2011 6:02:43 PM   
DONOVAN KURTWOOD


Posts: 7659
Joined: 6/10/2005
From: PLANET G


that's more like it!

_____________________________

Pack your bags, we're going on a guilt trip!

(in reply to DONOVAN KURTWOOD)
Post #: 59
RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... - 4/9/2011 6:03:34 PM   
thetruth


Posts: 1548
Joined: 3/8/2011

quote:

ORIGINAL: Spaldron


quote:

ORIGINAL: DONOVAN KURTWOOD

see i disagree, i own both The Mummy and Mummy Returns on blu ray and think that hi def makes the FX looks amazing. Especially in the first with the mummy himself, theyre so sharp and clear.




Ouch!

_____________________________

Without love we are dead

Protect children from vile and obscene videos

(in reply to Spaldron)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie Musings >> RE: CGI/Special effects in films..... Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.172