horribleives
Posts: 4249
Joined: 12/6/2009 From: The North
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: doubtlesswonder quote:
ORIGINAL: jobloffski The books are there for that. The 'coda' has a very specific purpose: to underline, yes, it is all over, and no, he's not coming back. Whether that holds forever, who knows, but Rowling wanted to be definitive, it's over. Shame that the director lacked the sense to see that visually, he had an insurmountable problem getting the ageing right, so should probably have shot the older version of the characters in extreme close ups to show ageing (lines, perhaps, flecks of grey, little bit of hair loss, enough for the impression of ageing to be created,then not had a full face reveal of the leads,, but have them seen from behind, still recognisably them, but no illusion shattering moment. And, then perhaps a surreal crossfade, showing the characters at the age before the 19 year time jump, waving goodbye to their kids, and by implication to the audience. Cheesy, but does the job. When they originally shot it, they all looked much older (the guys were all balding and the girls were REALLY wrinkly) and it was far too much. Besides, they're only 37ish in the epilogue (Ginny 36), which is roughly the same age Snape/Remus/Sirius are in the books, and nobody complained that they didn't have grey hair or wrinkles. With the exception of Remus, of course, who looked much older because of his affliction. It didn't look great but it don't spoil it for me - by the sound of it, the original make-up would'be been dreadful. One thing I couldn't help thinking when watching it though: surely one of the biggest franchises in cinema history could've found a few quid in their coffers for some Benjamin Button-style, realistic ageing effects? To waste money on a crappy 3D conversion in favour of actually, y'know, making your film look good is faintly depressing.
_____________________________
www.hollywoodunbound.co.uk - some nonsense about alien film directors and musclebound man-children.
|