jobloffski
Posts: 1847
Joined: 30/9/2005 From: elsewhere
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JIm R Spoliers..... I will say this to my dying day, AI should have ended when David fell from the ledge into the water. A dark end which would have been better, instead we got multiple Spielberg 'cuddly' bits and as always the soft option of a re-united son and family. My reading of the end is rather darker than yours: David, having discovered he is not unique or special and destroying the other David lets himself drop into the water to his 'death' with everything that happens after that being wishful thinking while he lies 'dying'. The ending, as I see it is what David wanted/wished for/dreamed of, not what he actually got. Even the look of the 'advanced mecha' has a foreshadow in the film: the blurred outline of David the very first time we see him is the same shape as the advanced mecha, who in my opinion, exist only in david's imagination. According to my reading of the end, David, like many Kubrick characters had a form of breakdown, when reality and what he wanted did not match up. Hal, Private Pyle, Little Alex, Dr Bill Harford, Jack Torrance and others all reach a point where they have been taken beyond what they can reconcile and react by losing it in some way. That may be in the form of violence towards others, towards themselves, or simply breaking down in tears. Notably, whatever idealistic idea David has of the love his 'mother' has for him, in the film, it is very shortlived as love as he thinks it is, mostly it is a mixture of mistrust, disgust, and finally, when her own real child is endangered, abandonment. David having a yearning to feel loved as he wants to be, and his capacity to blind himself to reality, and simply imagine whatever version of love that suits him, that pointedly excludes his father and brother, is the point, IMO, where the A.I crosses the final threshold between being a programmed device and sentient, because he is able to imagine what he wants for his own happiness. And that makes an ending where he does exactly that, as Kubrickian as it gets (including as it does, as with 2001, a character evolving to a higher level of existence after a harrowing journey beyond what his existence to date prepares him for)
< Message edited by jobloffski -- 18/7/2011 5:54:28 PM >
_____________________________
Yes, dreamers dream and doers do. But if dreamers DON'T dream, doers don't have anything TO do. Everything that is only here because people exist, only exists because someone thought of it., or in other words, dreamed it.
|