Super Hans
Posts: 2291
Joined: 30/9/2005 From: Watford
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Whistler quote:
ORIGINAL: Mr Grady quote:
ORIGINAL: theoriginalcynic IGN have rated it four stars, Total film three stars. This is a terrible review. It doesn't even sound like he's watched it. That's absurd. Is the reviewer supposed to just agree with the others? Do you? This is one persons opinion, thousands will have their's. That's true, it is just one persons opinion, but can you honestly agree with him in that Saw is a better movie franchise than Scream? I think the reason a lot of people are complaining (me included), is because it's literally a bad review. Even if, as he says, the film turns out to be crap, the review is still rubbish because he's barely talked about the film and what's actually wrong with it. It's already a short review without him spending half of it giving a breif history of the previous three... "It’s not entirely witless, but after the imaginative contraption-killings of the Saw septology, watching multiple knife murders, however ironically intended, is about as thrilling as standing in line at the butcher’s — without a bag of sausages to make it worth your while" To me, he's not saying that the Saw franchise is better, just that watching people get stabbed multiple times is more repetitive and monotonous than the elaborately gory deaths that Saw,for example, has produced. Not that I'm saying Saw franchise is better (although the first one is actually a good film), I'm a fan of the first two Screams but a watered down, certificate 15 iteration of a very 90's concept just seems a bit wet compared to the style of horror films that they've moved on to now.
_____________________________
"Its staring at you in the face Mark, there's only one more sex to try..."
|