Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

Never Let Me Go

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> Never Let Me Go Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Never Let Me Go - 7/2/2011 9:10:26 AM   
Empire Admin

 

Posts: 26334
Joined: 29/6/2005
Post your comments on this article
Post #: 1
Strangely unappealing... - 7/2/2011 9:10:26 AM   
The Voice of Fate


Posts: 113
Joined: 11/10/2005
I'm a big science fiction fan and a fan of Ms Mulligan - but I don't want to see this. The nature of the story and what will unfold was blindingly obvious from the trailer and has been done many times.

Furthermore, I can't understand why people would want to go to the cinema to be saddened and depressed. Isn't there enough of that in real life? I'll stick to Blade Runner thank you. Similar theme but with optimism and redemption...

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 2
Strangely unappealing... - 7/2/2011 9:10:27 AM   
The Voice of Fate


Posts: 113
Joined: 11/10/2005
I'm a big science fiction fan and a fan of Ms Mulligan - but I don't want to see this. The nature of the story and what will unfold was blindingly obvious from the trailer and has been done many times.

Furthermore, I can't understand why people would want to go to the cinema to be saddened and depressed. Isn't there enough of that in real life? I'll stick to Blade Runner thank you. Similar theme but with optimism and redemption...

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 3
- 7/2/2011 9:54:47 AM   
ARmy2510

 

Posts: 107
Joined: 21/4/2008
Great sad movie. I don't like depressed movies but Never Let Me Go is beautiful and unique that I just buy it.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 4
RE: - 7/2/2011 1:16:21 PM   
Evil_Bob


Posts: 2866
Joined: 1/5/2006
From: GGGAAAHHH!!!
*Spoilers*
I kind of expected this to get a decent review in Empire due to the Britishness of the film but I failed to care in anyway about characters
who couldn't even care very much about themselves.
I don't see how the reviewer can make the point that "it’s not even relevant to bring up the broader moral ramifications of their situation, or for them to challenge its justness." when to rebel against such an oppressive and life-threatening situation is an entirely human thing to do and god knows the film tries hard enough to prove that thats exactly what these people are. Many people throughout history have successfully rebelled against forces that threatened their existence so how can one be expected to identify with characters who just don't seem to give a damn.

Possibly in the novel there's some exposition that explains that this particular human trait is deliberately left out of them at a genetic level but this still wouldnt explain why they have little to no outrage at the imminent death of their loved ones. Even if they cared little for themselves the threat against the people they supposedly "loved" should have been enough to spark some kind of rebellious streak in them. God knows I would have done considerable damage to myself in an attempt to destroy my organs as the last retort rather than have somebody harvest me to benefit somebody else who doesn't deserve my life.

So no it wasn't a sad film. Its only sad when you can empathise with characters and in this film you most certainly can not.
It does look good though.


_____________________________

How dare you call me inhumane. Right you fucker. I'm going to do the washing up.


(in reply to ARmy2510)
Post #: 5
Wow - 7/2/2011 2:22:36 PM   
bereski


Posts: 264
Joined: 11/7/2007
From: Torun
Stunning movie, great performances, one of the most brilliant sci fi ever.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 6
RE: Strangely unappealing... - 7/2/2011 10:23:00 PM   
Deviation


Posts: 26908
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Enemies of Film HQ
quote:

ORIGINAL: The Voice of Fate

I'm a big science fiction fan and a fan of Ms Mulligan - but I don't want to see this. The nature of the story and what will unfold was blindingly obvious from the trailer and has been done many times.


That's a shame becuase it's genuinely a great film and quite similar to Gattaca in some stylistic aspects. The plot's direction obvious, the film is basically a flashback, it's the fatalistic aspect that makes it fantastic.

quote:

Furthermore, I can't understand why people would want to go to the cinema to be saddened and depressed. Isn't there enough of that in real life? I'll stick to Blade Runner thank you. Similar theme but with optimism and redemption...


What optimism? It spit optimism in the face with the DC. The most optimistic thing about it is the acceptance of death by Batty, the jetpacks and flying cars. No wait, it didn't have the jetpacks.And the answer for the first bit is that they can be cathartic and quite brilliant btw, and that is a massively silly question to ask. It's like asking why do people go to get scared or to feel tense in the cinema why they could just stay home and relax.

SLIGHT SPOILERS

quote:


I kind of expected this to get a decent review in Empire due to the Britishness of the film but I failed to care in anyway about characters who couldn't even care very much about themselves.


I think they pretty much do care about themselves, they do try to find a way to evade completion.

quote:

I don't see how the reviewer can make the point that "it's not even relevant to bring up the broader moral ramifications of their situation, or for them to challenge its justness." when to rebel against such an oppressive and life-threatening situation is an entirely human thing to do and god knows the film tries hard enough to prove that thats exactly what these people are. Many people throughout history have successfully rebelled against forces that threatened their existence so how can one be expected to identify with characters who just don't seem to give a damn.


I disagree. They were forced into a closed environment true, but they were given liberty, were told to be quite special and were given a very comfortable lifestyle. They were also taught to accept what will happen to them. They were also taught that any sort of subversion is repulsive to the extreme. There did seem to be an element that dying for the donations was an admirable thing to do. People have rebelled throughout history agaisnt oppression but there also have been those who didn't mind conforming to their situation, and when they are taught from a very young age about how to behave, I can completely buy that they just simply the situation.

quote:

Possibly in the novel there's some exposition that explains that this particular human trait is deliberately left out of them at a genetic level but this still wouldnt explain why they have little to no outrage at the imminent death of their loved ones. Even if they cared little for themselves the threat against the people they supposedly "loved" should have been enough to spark some kind of rebellious streak in them. God knows I would have done considerable damage to myself in an attempt to destroy my organs as the last retort rather than have somebody harvest me to benefit somebody else who doesn't deserve my life.


I have to disagree again, they accepted what they were, what their fate was, and even if they rebelled, not much would have happened as people would hardly want to go back to the time of cancer and other life-destroying diseases. Also, people can just stay quiet and accept their fate, and there was that story about true lovers being given a longer life which helped them to accept the situation. People don't always act like heroes and warriors in such situations and it was refreshing to see characters behave in such a way (and the plot taking such a direction).

SPOILERS END

Sorry there, I really loved the film. The people who made that atrocious trailer need to be punished, maybe by a whipping.


< Message edited by Deviation -- 7/2/2011 10:28:53 PM >


_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dpp1978
There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement.

quote:


ORIGINAL: elab49
I really wish I could go down to see Privates

(in reply to The Voice of Fate)
Post #: 7
RE: Strangely unappealing... - 8/2/2011 1:15:11 PM   
hatebox

 

Posts: 942
Joined: 14/2/2008
I should check this out. I was sitting next to my sister on a plane a couple of months ago and she suddenly burst into tears after watching the film. It was weird. 

(in reply to Deviation)
Post #: 8
RE: Strangely unappealing... - 8/2/2011 2:03:20 PM   
nhassell


Posts: 237
Joined: 23/8/2009
I saw this right back in November. Really good film. Great performances (though I didn't think Knightly was up to much).

_____________________________

Iron Man 3 - ***
Evil Dead - ***
The Place Beyond The Pines - ****
Oblivion - *
Spring Breakers - ***

(in reply to hatebox)
Post #: 9
RE: Strangely unappealing... - 8/2/2011 2:25:29 PM   
Evil_Bob


Posts: 2866
Joined: 1/5/2006
From: GGGAAAHHH!!!
Wow a decent argument for once :D

quote:

I think they pretty much do care about themselves, they do try to find a way to evade completion.


Not so much evade it as just put it off for a couple of years so they can be together something they could have been doing in the ten years between when she left the farm and sought them out just as they were being completed. They also give up just because the least difficult option they had turned out not to be an option at all.

quote:

I disagree. They were forced into a closed environment true, but they were given liberty, were told to be quite special and were given a very comfortable lifestyle. They were also taught to accept what will happen to them.


They were given total liberty (at least Carey Mulligans character was as we didn't really see what the other two had done for 10 years). By living amongst regular people that she's indistinguishable from how did this not give her more of a desire for life.

quote:

People have rebelled throughout history against oppression but there also have been those who didn't mind conforming to their situation,


Yes but you'll find few cases where people have resigned themselves to certain death without having fought to free themselves in some way. Survival is one of the most basic animal instincts let alone human ones. Plus as I said peoples survival instinct tends to go up when loved ones life's are in general as well. I mean this is the reason that the Nazi's had to pretend the gas chambers were showers because if their victims knew exactly what was going to happen to them they'd have found it a lot harder to kill as many people as they did due to people panicking and rioting trying to save themselves.

quote:

and even if they rebelled, not much would have happened as people would hardly want to go back to the time of cancer and other life-destroying diseases.
quote:



But they don't know that. They didn't even try was my point.

quote:

People don't always act like heroes and warriors in such situations and it was refreshing to see characters behave in such a way


But none of them seemed to do it. there was no talk of other people not standing for it and rebelling then dying in a hail of bullets of killing themselves to spoil their organs or even being imprisoned to stop rebellions. If there had been mention of cases like this then I could have empathised with their despair at the futility of it all but there was no mention of this so it seemed like they gave up without even trying.

Plus it still just annoys me that she knew that him and her bitchy mate had broken up but still didn't try to contact him for 10 years. Ten years of opportunity that they wasted. Didn't deserve the deferring even if it had existed.




_____________________________

How dare you call me inhumane. Right you fucker. I'm going to do the washing up.


(in reply to nhassell)
Post #: 10
RE: Strangely unappealing... - 8/2/2011 3:58:14 PM   
Deviation


Posts: 26908
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Enemies of Film HQ
I'M GONNA WIN THIS DEBATE BITCH

quote:



Not so much evade it as just put it off for a couple of years so they can be together something they could have been doing in the ten years between when she left the farm and sought them out just as they were being completed. They also give up just because the least difficult option they had turned out not to be an option at all.


And any other option is pretty much pointless and unavailable. They were taught, grown up and conditioned into accepting they are donors above all costs, and they tried there best to give themselves some more time before having to do what was considered inevitable and an absolute necessary for them.

quote:


They were given total liberty (at least Carey Mulligans character was as we didn't really see what the other two had done for 10 years). By living amongst regular people that she's indistinguishable from how did this not give her more of a desire for life.



We are never really are shown how Mulligan passed those ten years, so from all we know she might have been ostracized for being a clone. SPOILERS Helsham did try to sell the outside world that they were human and they had souls. Society didn't care and still regarded the clones as sub-human prototypes. SPOILERS. Even with that experience you still have them being taught all their lives in a boarding school (and probably the Cottages) which didn't allow them to go further than the borders. I wouldn't be surprised if by that time they would have been brainwashed into thinking that them dying in a space of fifteen years would be the only direction their life could take, and all the clones we see seem to have accepted that fate. They were at first raised in a hermetic society after all.

quote:

Yes but you'll find few cases where people have resigned themselves to certain death without having fought to free themselves in some way. Survival is one of the most basic animal instincts let alone human ones. Plus as I said peoples survival instinct tends to go up when loved ones life's are in general as well. I mean this is the reason that the Nazi's had to pretend the gas chambers were showers because if their victims knew exactly what was going to happen to them they'd have found it a lot harder to kill as many people as they did due to people panicking and rioting trying to save themselves.


True (although from my knowledge it was more than just a few who didn't fight back), but others didn't so the point remains. There is also a big difference between these clones and other people with a more normal upbringing is that they were taught in all their lives that they needed to die and that this will happen. They were not taught in the same way ordinary people were. Sure, there might have been those who ran away, but this was not a film about those clones.

quote:


But they don't know that. They didn't even try was my point.


SPOILERS

That is said when they meet the Madame for the deferral. Other clones who might have thought a different conclusion to their lives were possibly told the same thing. Even if they rebelled, people wouldn't care and nothing would be achieved. It was quite a hopeless situation, which Mulligan's character accepts and angers Garfield's character immensely.

SPOILERS END

quote:


But none of them seemed to do it. there was no talk of other people not standing for it and rebelling then dying in a hail of bullets of killing themselves to spoil their organs or even being imprisoned to stop rebellions. If there had been mention of cases like this then I could have empathised with their despair at the futility of it all but there was no mention of this so it seemed like they gave up without even trying.


MORE SLIGHT SPOILERS

Fair enough on the rest (though it does seem that you are criticizing the film what it didn't want to cover) but the last sentence is what I have issue with. They accepted it? Society didn't care about them and the clones just accepted their situation. With a society that considers them cattle and with the clones being told that they need to submit to death it is understandable on why they just rolled with it.

quote:

Plus it still just annoys me that she knew that him and her bitchy mate had broken up but still didn't try to contact him for 10 years. Ten years of opportunity that they wasted. Didn't deserve the deferring even if it had existed.


It is part of the film's point that she wasted a big opportunity and that she feels saddened about that. I did get the impression that Mulligan thought that the relationship wouldn't work or that Knightley's character would somehow get in the way so she simply tried to move on in an attempt to forget Garfield. This is just speculation of course as the film does keep quite a bit of the plot ambiguous.

< Message edited by Deviation -- 8/2/2011 4:35:40 PM >


_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dpp1978
There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement.

quote:


ORIGINAL: elab49
I really wish I could go down to see Privates

(in reply to Evil_Bob)
Post #: 11
RE: Never Let Me Go - 9/2/2011 12:51:31 PM   
tftrman


Posts: 3192
Joined: 15/11/2005
Quietly beautiful film - all three leads were fantastic, the story was understated but told well and unlike other posters I did care about the characters and as such found the film very engaging. I think the Empire review does a disservice to the period detail - perhaps that is because it was done so well that it was taken for granted.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 12
RE: Never Let Me Go - 9/2/2011 4:01:08 PM   
Evil_Bob


Posts: 2866
Joined: 1/5/2006
From: GGGAAAHHH!!!
quote:

I'M GONNA WIN THIS DEBATE BITCH


Shan't

quote:

And any other option is pretty much pointless and unavailable. They were taught, grown up and conditioned into accepting they are donors above all costs, and they tried there best to give themselves some more time before having to do what was considered inevitable and an absolute necessary for them.


But they also spend a lot of time proving that they were human after all and even when they get vindication for this idea (when their old headmistress flat out tells them that they have souls) the only thing they do is give up. Surely being told that you're the same as everybody else would inject a sense of righteous indignation in you. A desire to live. As I said before survival is one of the very basic animal insticts. They're not even tied down on the operating table ffs.

quote:

We are never really are shown how Mulligan passed those ten years, so from all we know she might have been ostracized for being a clone.


No we weren't which is another problem. If we had been shown this then things might have been more understandable. How they're supposed to be identified as clones at all isn't clear either as they are humans through and through.

quote:

Helsham did try to sell the outside world that they were human and they had souls. Society didn't care and still regarded the clones as sub-human prototypes.


This doesn't mean that they can't rebel in some way. That they can't try and escape somehow. Giving up without a fight is pathetic no matter which way you look at it.

quote:

I wouldn't be surprised if by that time they would have been brainwashed into thinking that them dying in a space of fifteen years would be the only direction their life could take, and all the clones we see seem to have accepted that fate. They were at first raised in a hermetic society after all.


And if they went straight from this isolated school system to the operating table that would make more sense but they live freely in the outside world for years before they're killed. Doesn't take much time for somebody to get some form of joie de vivre.

quote:

True (although from my knowledge it was more than just a few who didn't fight back), but others didn't so the point remains.


My point was that they didn't give resistance because they didn't know they were going to die and didn't realise it until too late. Keeping quiet and falling orders in the hope that it would lead to not dying is another form of self-preservation. If this doesn't work then you attack your attacker as you've got nothing else to lose. Why couldn't our clone buddies have done this?

quote:

Sure, there might have been those who ran away, but this was not a film about those clones.


No we get the film about the timid resigned pathetic ones who don't even fight hard on behalf of the ones that they supposedly love let alone themselves.

quote:

That is said when they meet the Madame for the deferral. Other clones who might have thought a different conclusion to their lives were possibly told the same thing. Even if they rebelled, people wouldn't care and nothing would be achieved. It was quite a hopeless situation, which Mulligan's character accepts and angers Garfield's character immensely.


"Possibly" being the operative word seeing as we're not told it and don't see it and since when has rebelling been about trying to convince your oppressors that they're doing the wrong thing?
Its about giving them a hard enough time so that they'll give in for an easy life.

quote:

Fair enough on the rest (though it does seem that you are criticizing the film what it didn't want to cover) but the last sentence is what I have issue with. They accepted it? Society didn't care about them and the clones just accepted their situation. With a society that considers them cattle and with the clones being told that they need to submit to death it is understandable on why they just rolled with it.


So why didn't they go for death on their own terms like what I already said. Sure spite isn't a great attribute but when its your LIFE that you're talking about..........well lets just say that nobody would get my life for nothing if I could help it. And yes I am criticising the film on what it doesn't want to cover because leaving out aspects of this world that they've created make me ask questions and not buy into it which is why I've been able to talk so much shite in support of my argument. Covering the other aspects even a bit would have left me with nothing to complain about other than that I didn't like the movie but I probably would have liked it apart from all the reasons I said because it looked nice and the performances were strong and the general ambience of it was pleasant. It just left me feeling hollow afterward and with a bad taste in my mouth.

quote:

It is part of the film's point that she wasted a big opportunity and that she feels saddened about that.


I'm not sure that it is to be fair. The blame for them not being together all seemed to be lumped on Keira Knightley who to be fair should shoulder a large part of the blame but she says it in her voiceover that she knew the two had broken up when she left "By the time Ruth and Tommy actually did seperate my carer training had already begun so I was hardly ever at the cottages" This means that she knew they'd broken up and that she still saw them, albeit infrequently. No excuse for losing touch with them as she does.



_____________________________

How dare you call me inhumane. Right you fucker. I'm going to do the washing up.


(in reply to tftrman)
Post #: 13
RE: Never Let Me Go - 9/2/2011 5:30:41 PM   
Deviation


Posts: 26908
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Enemies of Film HQ
quote:

Shan't


Yes, I will. SUBMIT TO ME BITCH

quote:

But they also spend a lot of time proving that they were human after all and even when they get vindication for this idea (when their old headmistress flat out tells them that they have souls) the only thing they do is give up. Surely being told that you're the same as everybody else would inject a sense of righteous indignation in you. A desire to live. As I said before survival is one of the very basic animal insticts. They're not even tied down on the operating table ffs.


Which in turn other people didn't bother (clones having souls) and clearly wouldn't even try to bother as they are a lifesaving material.

I can say that quite a number of people were told the were not the same and didn't react in righteous indignation and there have been a number of people who have been driven to death by hopeless circumstances. Survival being a primal instinct or not they were still nurtured into submitting to death. There have been people who have sacrificed themselves for what they believe was their greater duty. It was also a hopeless situation which Mulligan accepted but the other. They did a long ambitious experiment which in turn was a failure. People clearly didn't care and didn't want to care. And the only two operations we see were by people who were quite physically weak in themselves and had refused to live anymore. They are thought of subhumans and would have faced social constraints. They are flawed characters who have failed to do anything about it, restrained their emotions for what they thought it was duty and right, not grand exemplars of humanity who have rebelled against society and social constraint and oppression. In that way, it follows what I know of The Remains of the Day.

quote:

No we weren't which is another problem. If we had been shown this then things might have been more understandable. How they're supposed to be identified as clones at all isn't clear either as they are humans through and through.


This is true, but considering people's attitude towards the clones, I can imagine them being ostracized. The fact that the film just focuses on the lead characters, their failings and just hints at anything else is one of the things I like from it. Any more focus on other things would have made the film loose momentum and detract for it's focus.

quote:

This doesn't mean that they can't rebel in some way. That they can't try and escape somehow. Giving up without a fight is pathetic no matter which way you look at it.


It's not pathetic at all, they tried in the bets way they could, they were clearly in knowledge that it was hopeless and that any escape would have probably been futile so it might have been better to just do their duty. Of course, this is a failing of theirs and a massive flaw of theirs but that failing is part of the film's point. The point is to empathize with their failings and feel their sadness, and judging from the little I know of Ishiguro, it did a good job doing that here.

quote:

And if they went straight from this isolated school system to the operating table that would make more sense but they live freely in the outside world for years before they're killed. Doesn't take much time for somebody to get some form of joie de vivre.


Doesn't take much time to strip it off again and to take it away by saying that they need to submit as that is their purpose from birth, and you teach that from early childhood.

quote:

My point was that they didn't give resistance because they didn't know they were going to die and didn't realise it until too late. Keeping quiet and falling orders in the hope that it would lead to not dying is another form of self-preservation. If this doesn't work then you attack your attacker as you've got nothing else to lose. Why couldn't our clone buddies have done this?


Indeed, and this is the massive flaw the clones show and that the film (and I suspect book) chastise.

quote:

No we get the film about the timid resigned pathetic ones who don't even fight hard on behalf of the ones that they supposedly love let alone themselves.


Which part of being taught all their life that it is their duty to die and they need to do so is pathetic? It's not pathetic. It's a failure the characters show. They failed. It's what some people end up doing.

quote:



"Possibly" being the operative word seeing as we're not told it and don't see it and since when has rebelling been about trying to convince your oppressors that they're doing the wrong thing?


We are partially told as we are told that other couples tried to do it before them, but then they started to show less. And rebelling for the sake of rebelling wouldn't have done much. They probably should have but they don't. It's a failing of theirs.

quote:

Its about giving them a hard enough time so that they'll give in for an easy life.


Which they do in the film? They were given a good easy life, albeit one with not much liberty.

quote:

So why didn't they go for death on their own terms like what I already said. Sure spite isn't a great attribute but when its your LIFE that you're talking about..........well lets just say that nobody would get my life for nothing if I could help it. And yes I am criticising the film on what it doesn't want to cover because leaving out aspects of this world that they've created make me ask questions and not buy into it which is why I've been able to talk so much shite in support of my argument.


Wait, surely you can buy that people can buy into dying as a form of duty, fail to do create romances or do the right choices as the clones in this film do to? People have died becuase they thought it was their duty to do so, lost their will to will or just submitted. They have been a multiple, a big number, from The Island to THX 1138 that dealt with those who fight back, this deals with those who fail to do so and the consequences. It comes out as somewhat critical about it without saying in your face "SEE THIS BAD FIGHT BACK FIGHT BACK".

quote:


Covering the other aspects even a bit would have left me with nothing to complain about other than that I didn't like the movie but I probably would have liked it apart from all the reasons I said because it looked nice and the performances were strong and the general ambience of it was pleasant. It just left me feeling hollow afterward and with a bad taste in my mouth.


Which is fair enough.

quote:

I'm not sure that it is to be fair. The blame for them not being together all seemed to be lumped on Keira Knightley who to be fair should shoulder a large part of the blame but she says it in her voiceover that she knew the two had broken up when she left "By the time Ruth and Tommy actually did seperate my carer training had already begun so I was hardly ever at the cottages" This means that she knew they'd broken up and that she still saw them, albeit infrequently. No excuse for losing touch with them as she does.


Yes, Mulligan does a mistake and fails to reciprocate with her any romance becuase she focused on her duty instead of her emotions, and any chance of revoking that comes way too late. She choose her career as a Carer over Tommy. It's a failing she does. It's a failure her character shows.


Btw I apologize if I'm being way too overbearing here, worthy adversary. 

< Message edited by Deviation -- 9/2/2011 7:21:38 PM >


_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dpp1978
There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement.

quote:


ORIGINAL: elab49
I really wish I could go down to see Privates

(in reply to Evil_Bob)
Post #: 14
RE: Never Let Me Go - 9/2/2011 10:47:01 PM   
vad3r


Posts: 4229
Joined: 3/9/2010
From: Close to Mod HQ
Carey Mulligan is the most boring and annoying (well it's hard to beat Ellen Page) actress around. How she finds work with her pouty Keira Knightly attitude and dull as dishwater roles is beyond me.
Roll on the next period costume drama.

_____________________________

Single Virgin Mod Candidate 2013


quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives
To paraphrase the great man himself:

Vad3r won't go anywhere near this.

(in reply to Deviation)
Post #: 15
RE: Never Let Me Go - 11/2/2011 3:20:57 AM   
Evil_Bob


Posts: 2866
Joined: 1/5/2006
From: GGGAAAHHH!!!
quote:

I'M GONNA WIN THIS DEBATE BITCH


Not if anything to say about it I have

quote:

Which in turn other people didn't bother (clones having souls) and clearly wouldn't even try to bother as they are a lifesaving material.


You're missing the point though. It isn't about "other people". The civil rights movement didn't happen because white people suddenly grew a conscience. It happened because black people refused to settle anymore for the kind of shit they were being subjected to.

quote:

I can say that quite a number of people were told the were not the same and didn't react in righteous indignation


Who are these people?

quote:

and there have been a number of people who have been driven to death by hopeless circumstances


Bud didn't necessarily go willingly.

quote:

Survival being a primal instinct or not they were still nurtured into submitting to death.


You have a poor opinion of the human spirit of the human spirit if you believe this to be possible.

quote:

There have been people who have sacrificed themselves for what they believe was their greater duty.


Sacrificing yourself, like say, on a battefield or dying in glory to save somebody isn't exactly the same thing as your entire life being solely for the purpose of saving somebody you do not know and who may very well not deserve it.

quote:

They did a long ambitious experiment which in turn was a failure.


The owners of the school perhaps. Something that our "heroes" knew nothing about until the end. And when they did find out they should have been filled with more desire to live than to die when they're told that they're actually human after all.

quote:

And the only two operations we see were by people who were quite physically weak in themselves and had refused to live anymore.


Due to them already having vital organs removed.

quote:

They are flawed characters who have failed to do anything about it, restrained their emotions for what they thought it was duty and right, not grand exemplars of humanity who have rebelled against society and social constraint and oppression.


Which only serves to strengthen my point of: Why should I care about them when they don't care about themselves?

quote:

In that way, it follows what I know of The Remains of the Day


I know nothing of Remains of the Day except that the source novels are by the same author.

quote:

but considering people's attitude towards the clones, I can imagine them being ostracized.


We see practically nobody's attitudes towards the clones. Everybody we do see seems to have the air of shame over them. The teachers in the school (especially the one who tries to tell them the truth) all seem not to entirely enjoy their jobs. The nurse in the hospital who commiserates with Carey Mulligan over Keira Knightleys imminent death. The farmer of the cottages who seems not to want to attach himself to them. None of the "real" humans in the movie give off a "racist" (for want of a better word) attitude towards them which would also imply that their existence doesn't sit very well with the general populous despite what their head teacher says.

quote:

Any more focus on other things would have made the film loose momentum and detract for it's focus.


Which is what made fail for me because we have no context in which to place their resigned attitude towards death.

quote:

It's not pathetic at all, they tried in the bets way they could, they were clearly in knowledge that it was hopeless and that any escape would have probably been futile so it might have been better to just do their duty.


Yes but I am not in this knowledge so I am outraged when I see them succumb to death without having tried any of the options of escape that I would had I been in the same situation.

quote:

Doesn't take much time to strip it off again and to take it away by saying that they need to submit as that is their purpose from birth, and you teach that from early childhood.


Wouldnt take much except you're thinking of things in the wrong order. A) They're told they're bred to die B) They go out to the outside world and see its worth living. It doesn't happen the other way around so stripping off that layer is not as easy when the alternative is dying.

quote:

Indeed, and this is the massive flaw the clones show and that the film (and I suspect book) chastise.


I got no sense of this chastising. I got a great sense of "pity these poor bastards" instead of "scoff at these useless bastards"

quote:

Which part of being taught all their life that it is their duty to die and they need to do so is pathetic?


The part where they believe it and actually do it.

quote:

It's a failure the characters show. They failed. It's what some people end up doing.


Which is what makes them pathetic.

quote:

We are partially told as we are told that other couples tried to do it before them,


Yeah we see the Irish couple talking about it and they also sink into despair when they realise that if the deferrment doesn't exist then that's all they've got as well. How is it exactly that the rumour of the deferrment got spread around anyway when absolutely nobody succeeded in getting one?

quote:

And rebelling for the sake of rebelling wouldn't have done much


It would have shown strength of character and made me give a shit about them.

quote:

Which they do in the film? They were given a good easy life, albeit one with not much liberty.


I was talking about their oppressors when I said "Its about giving them a hard enough time so that they'll give in for an easy life. ". As I said earlier, movements don't necessarily succeed because the oppressors suddenly grow a conscience.

quote:

Wait, surely you can buy that people can buy into dying as a form of duty


No I can't. I can buy into people dying as a form of a duty to a perceived greater good. I can understand why people die in wars. I can understand why terrorists kill themselves in suicide bombs. They do it because they believe (as misguided as it may be) that doing so will help their friends and family and their people ultimately.
These characters are apparently in love and therefore have an even greater impetus to live if not for themselves then for the ones they love but they do little to nothing.

It's also clear that they humans are not worried about the clones doing anything drastic to themselves or others as hardly any security measures are put into place other than the tag at the doors. They're allowed to freely go out into the country where for all the humans know they could be plotting an uprising. This suggests to me that all the other clones are as useless as our "heroes"

quote:

They have been a multiple, a big number, from The Island to THX 1138 that dealt with those who fight back, this deals with those who fail to do so and the consequences.


Which means (god help me for saying this) that the Island is probably more realistic than this movie. Oh god I feel dirty

quote:

Yes, Mulligan does a mistake and fails to reciprocate with her any romance becuase she focused on her duty instead of her emotions, and any chance of revoking that comes way too late. She choose her career as a Carer over Tommy. It's a failing she does. It's a failure her character shows.


She doesn't express regret at all though. She never actually says "fuck me I was an idiot for doing nothing for ten whole years". She doesn't even really blame Keira Knightley all that much. In fact I'd go so far as to say that Carey Mulligan was shite in this film. She was emotionless. Andrew Garfield was a wimp. Keira Knightley was a bitch. Unattractive characters.

quote:

Btw I apologize if I'm being way too overbearing here, worthy adversary.


Aha!!! A weakness. Your defenses are up. I strike!!!!

< Message edited by Evil_Bob -- 11/2/2011 3:23:24 AM >


_____________________________

How dare you call me inhumane. Right you fucker. I'm going to do the washing up.


(in reply to vad3r)
Post #: 16
RE: Never Let Me Go - 12/2/2011 12:29:39 AM   
Deviation


Posts: 26908
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Enemies of Film HQ
quote:

Not if anything to say about it I have


YOU SHALL FALL

quote:

You're missing the point though. It isn't about "other people". The civil rights movement didn't happen because white people suddenly grew a conscience. It happened because black people refused to settle anymore for the kind of shit they were being subjected to.


Yes, and this is not about the those who start a movement and who had the power to do so. This is about those who fail in doing so due to social constraints, those who resigned. Also, black people didn't suddenly refuse to accept their condition. There was slavery for about two centuries before the Emancipation Act and a century more before black movements started appearing. The clones were only in existence for not even a century and YOU can teach someone to think he/she is inferior and that he is to die anytime soon in a closed, manipulative, controlled environment.

quote:

Who are these people?


You could say it's related to circumstance. People who have lived and died in slavery for example, women who have accepted as being inferior to men in marriage for may centuries (I doubt history was filled with gallant feminists who did everything for gender equality), people in concentration camps who did not fight back (and there wasn't a big number who fought back), religoin....

quote:

Bud didn't necessarily go willingly.


I think people like the kamikaze and banzai charges did go very willingly to their deaths. Or those who commit suicide. Or those many slaves had to accept that position, many in torrid living conditions and inequality did accept that. or those told by religions and cults to do so. They were those who fought against it true, but they were those who simply submitted to it, sad as it is.

quote:

You have a poor opinion of the human spirit of the human spirit if you believe this to be possible.


What is the human spirit? *feels obnoxiously sophistic*

(I'll explain my reasoning on why I accept it further down)

quote:

Sacrificing yourself, like say, on a battefield or dying in glory to save somebody isn't exactly the same thing as your entire life being solely for the purpose of saving somebody you do not know and who may very well not deserve it.


Not if you are repeatedly told that it is from birth. Soldiers have been sent to their deaths to die in glory less deaths in repulsive places before for lurid political purposes. I don't see how teaching a person that he has to die from start out of duty by giving his organs to other people is any less unrealistic.

quote:

The owners of the school perhaps. Something that our "heroes" knew nothing about until the end. And when they did find out they should have been filled with more desire to live than to die when they're told that they're actually human after all.


Or simply resigned becuase they saw the situation as even more hopeless since not even actual proof can make people care for their life. An error and a mistake of theirs.

quote:

Due to them already having vital organs removed.


After being told all their lives they must.

quote:

Which only serves to strengthen my point of: Why should I care about them when they don't care about themselves?


In this point, nothing I say will convince you on why you should care, but I did feel empathy at what they fail to achieve and do and how hopeless they felt. This doesn't mean you must, but I certainly felt sad at how they failed to make their situations better. It's the same tragedy I felt when Thomas Jane does what he does at the of The Mist instead of doing the right thing in that circumstance, if this makes sense

quote:

I know nothing of Remains of the Day except that the source novels are by the same author.


I see them quite similar in theme.

quote:

We see practically nobody's attitudes towards the clones. Everybody we do see seems to have the air of shame over them. The teachers in the school (especially the one who tries to tell them the truth) all seem not to entirely enjoy their jobs. The nurse in the hospital who commiserates with Carey Mulligan over Keira Knightleys imminent death. The farmer of the cottages who seems not to want to attach himself to them. None of the "real" humans in the movie give off a "racist" (for want of a better word) attitude towards them which would also imply that their existence doesn't sit very well with the general populous despite what their head teacher says.


This just shows they are not really integrated into society for what could be many reasons, but we never go away of the clones perception of the story so we might not know.

quote:

Which is what made fail for me because we have no context in which to place their resigned attitude towards death.


I have. It's coming....

quote:

Wouldnt take much except you're thinking of things in the wrong order. A) They're told they're bred to die B) They go out to the outside world and see its worth living. It doesn't happen the other way around so stripping off that layer is not as easy when the alternative is dying.


By that time of B they would have accepted it though. From what I got they do enjoy the life offered but they also accept that they have to give in. Any desire of living might have been taken away by that restriction has been imposed on them.

quote:

I got no sense of this chastising. I got a great sense of "pity these poor bastards" instead of "scoff at these useless bastards"


Only it does, by showing their failures in not acting to do and failing in hope. It shows the consequences of what these characters do.

quote:

The part where they believe it and actually do it.


quote:

Which is what makes them pathetic.


quote:



No I can't. I can buy into people dying as a form of a duty to a perceived greater good. I can understand why people die in wars. I can understand why terrorists kill themselves in suicide bombs. They do it because they believe (as misguided as it may be) that doing so will help their friends and family and their people ultimately.
These characters are apparently in love and therefore have an even greater impetus to live if not for themselves then for the ones they love but they do little to nothing.

It's also clear that they humans are not worried about the clones doing anything drastic to themselves or others as hardly any security measures are put into place other than the tag at the doors. They're allowed to freely go out into the country where for all the humans know they could be plotting an uprising. This suggests to me that all the other clones are as useless as our "heroes"


I've decided to join this four comments together. *DDDDDDUUUUUURRRRRN*

This is the part where I say my bit mentioned in the human spirit bit (and bits which I have discussed with another person the last day). The film is probably an extreme allegory but I do think the workings shown in the film can be possible. When one is being told over and over again that they should accept the ultimate sacrifice, giving up their own lives, although they should not consider it as such, but rather as the PROPER order of things. I do beleive a person can end believing the things the clones do. The decisions we do regardless of their significance are based on a Whim rather than based on rational reasoning. Whim is governed by emotion, emotion is governed by Habit. Habit is governed by repetition. Repetition is a mind-conditioning effect telling us this is the way things go. So if one is told this is the proper way for thing to go, and his mind is conditioned to believe so, then he may not resist the idea of death, cos it'd be under the guise of self-sacrifice, noble deeds, having your organs taken out at a certain age etc....I do believe that repetition and careful manipulation can lead to the clones to believe such things. They were in a closed system, through indoctrination and exemplification there may arise specific behavioural patterns according to a manipulator's intention.

After them being taught that all their lives in that manner, I don't see anything pathetic in them resigning.

quote:

I was talking about their oppressors when I said "Its about giving them a hard enough time so that they'll give in for an easy life. ". As I said earlier, movements don't necessarily succeed because the oppressors suddenly grow a conscience.


That's true, but this still proved a failure that destroyed any hope the clones had for living longer.

quote:

Which means (god help me for saying this) that the Island is probably more realistic than this movie. Oh god I feel dirty


You believe a film where a man spends his life with Scarlett Johanson and still didn't get sexual urges? Now that's undermining human nature.

(and it was a different scenario thinking of it, unlike NLMG, the entire reality was a sham, in NLMG, it still was part of their reality)

quote:

She doesn't express regret at all though. She never actually says "fuck me I was an idiot for doing nothing for ten whole years". She doesn't even really blame Keira Knightley all that much. In fact I'd go so far as to say that Carey Mulligan was shite in this film. She was emotionless. Andrew Garfield was a wimp. Keira Knightley was a bitch. Unattractive characters.


She clearly shows emotions of regret and sadness towards what happened. She probably knows it is her fault for choosing her career over Garfield and Garfield was weak and basically couldn't do anything. Knghtly realizes her mistake and what a bitch she was at the end, that's pretty clear with her tracking the Madame.

quote:

Aha!!! A weakness. Your defenses are up. I strike!!!!





hehehehe he thinks I've given him a false sense of security, cunning plan is working.







< Message edited by Deviation -- 12/2/2011 12:31:22 AM >


_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dpp1978
There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement.

quote:


ORIGINAL: elab49
I really wish I could go down to see Privates

(in reply to Evil_Bob)
Post #: 17
RE: Never Let Me Go - 12/2/2011 1:04:48 AM   
Incanus


Posts: 15971
Joined: 23/7/2008
From: Winterfell
quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation

The decisions we do regardless of their significance are based on a Whim rather than based on rational reasoning.



I'd say not all the decisions we make, but a great deal thereof certainly.


_____________________________

WINTER IS COMING

T h e 2 4 t h F r a m e . c o . u k

Cuiva Olorin
Narendur.
Tira nottolya
Tulta tuolya.
An mauya mahtie
Ter oiomornie
Ter ondicilyar
Mettanna.
Nurunna!

(in reply to Deviation)
Post #: 18
- 13/2/2011 3:57:35 PM   
kachna_ff

 

Posts: 28
Joined: 11/10/2005
Greatly impressed with Carey Mulligan, and Garfield is always a joy to watch, even if the story he tells makes me cry ;)

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 19
Hmmm - 14/2/2011 1:11:31 PM   
chris wootton

 

Posts: 382
Joined: 15/9/2006
Sounds like the four star review is for the book. The NEXT Autumn Collection Advert... sorry, I meant the film, left me very cold

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 20
RE: Never Let Me Go - 15/2/2011 9:34:40 PM   
R W

 

Posts: 268
Joined: 23/6/2006
Director: Mark Romanek
Screenwriter: Alex Garland
Starring: Carey Mulligan, Andrew Garfield, Keira Knightley, Charlotte Rampling, Sally Hawkins

Synopsis
As children, Kathy, Tommy and Ruth (Mulligan, Garfield, Knightley) spend their childhood at a seemingly idyllic English boarding school. As they grow into young adults, they find that they have to come to terms with the strength of the love they feel for each other, while preparing themselves for the haunting reality that awaits them.

Review
On the basis of reading my synopsis, you’re probably wondering what kind of movie is it, but for those who are familiar with the novel of the same name, will know that it is a sci-fi film with a twist.

The novel by The Remains of the Day author Kazuo Ishiguro to which this is based, is a dystopian sci-fi about cloning, which of course has been explored many times, perhaps most recently Michael Bay’s The Island that bears similarities to Michael Marshall Smith’s novel Spares. Instead of the futuristic backgrounds consist of heavy raining, the backdrop is the 20th century English countryside except with the knowledge of cloning.

The adaptation does not avoid this alternate reality or indeed the novel’s subtle storytelling as the film never comes to the point of a big revelation and instead gently explores the lives between these three young people from their childhood to their completion.

As someone who is currently working on the field of science-fiction such as Danny Boyle’s Sunshine and the upcoming Judge Dredd movie, screenwriter Alex Garland cleverly presents these classic sci-fi themes of dystopia and humanity in an environment you wouldn’t expect to allow these ideas. In fact, Blade Runner’s infamous motto “More human than human” can perfectly describe the clones as their feelings towards each other, good or bad, is what defines who they secretly are.

From the beginnings of Hailsham (the English boarding school) where we see the three protagonists as children, you sense that there is something unusual from the workings of the school most notably the children won’t take a single step out of the premises. While you sense the bleakness of the school, there is a glimmer of humanity between the three lead characters particularly Kathy as (in the film’s most beautiful sequence) she listens for the first time the song Never Let Me Go by fictional singer Judy Bridgewater.

Despite its sci-fi premise, since being faithful to the Ishiguro novel the film will not be for everyone due to its slow pace and very sombre tone. However if you like other offbeat sci-fi pics like Steven Soderbergh’s Solaris and Darren Aronofsky’s The Fountain, then you will enjoy this as director Mark Romanek isn’t interested in robots or futuristic science, but rather a love triangle that is engaging and moving.

Playing the lead role that in many ways is the voice of the movie, Carey Mulligan brings such warmth to the character of Kathy who is essentially an isolated figure despite having a lot of love to give, as well as being in a world where she is rather distant. Having seen him in The Social Network, Andrew Garfield knows how to jump into a different role as in this, in which he plays the most child-like of the three as he tries to reveal a sense of freedom and yet feels awkward. As for Keira Knightley who plays the most difficult part in the film, she succeeds at portraying someone who is unsympathetic, but wanting to reveal a lighter side to her personality.

Verdict
While its subtle tone will be a problem for some, it presents sci-fi in a modern lyrical fashion that is beautiful and accompanied by three strong performances.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 21
RE: Never Let Me Go - 16/2/2011 12:51:04 AM   
Qwerty Norris


Posts: 3150
Joined: 26/10/2005
From: Edinburgh
It's not often you get to use the description "understated science fiction”, as predominantly within the genre cinema tends to impose a large degree of sensationalism or a high levelled concept . Directed by Mark Romanek and penned by Alex Garland, 'Never Let Me Go' (the Kazuo Ishiguro novel about a trio of clones experiencing som...e very human feelings) certainly fits that description – without a spaceship, alien, robot, gun or laser in sight.  

The understated aspect arrives in the fact that this isn't a story or a consequent film that attempts to address "why”, more a case of "how.” The characters of Kathy, Tommy and Ruth (played beautifully by Carey Mulligan, Andrew Garfield and Keira Knightley – yes, even her!) never question the appalling conclusion their lives are heading towards to, in fact, they accept it without question - which in turn provides 'Never Let Me Go' it's strongest and most tragic characteristic, but likely in many people's eyes also its weakest.  

For those in question, there will no doubt be a complaint along the lines of "why are they accepting this?” "Why aren't they going on the run / damaging themselves in protest” and so forth. To answer that, this isn't just a film about them accepting their destinies; it's also one about the corrupting power of brainwashing. For a third of the film's duration, we witness the origins of the leading trio's story as children at a boarding school –where they are groomed to believe that their journey to "completion” is a rightful and honourable destination. In this segment it's arguably where the film is strongest and perfectly sets up the inevitable devastation to come.  

Which is also in no small part to the efforts of both its director and screenwriter - Mark Romanek; an individual better known for some highly flashy videos for the likes of Michael Jackson, the Red Hot Chilli Peppers and No Doubt, continues his restrained approach to feature films which he started with in 'One Hour Photo' and allows his actors to breathe naturally into scenes with minimal interference - collaborating with cinematographer Adam Kimmel in achieving some beautiful images in the process. Whilst Alex Garland, someone who has always conjured up intriguing premises in both his novels and screenplays but has frequently struggled to conclude them satisfyingly ('the Beach', '28 Days Later' & 'Sunshine' all key examples) has no problem here – successfully adapting the celebrated novel into a well-paced and affectively -structured film.  

As previously stated, there will be many who will be left frustrated (perhaps even bored)by the experience but for those willing to give it the chance, 'Never Let Me Go' is a expertly constructed piece enriched with moments that are both haunting and heart-breaking in equal measure. Undoubtedly cruelly-overlooked in this year's awards season.  

_____________________________

Qwerty's Top 10 of 2013 (so far)

1. Zero Dark Thirty
2. No
3. In The Fog
4. Good Vibrations
5. McCullin
6. Beyond the Hills
7. The Place Beyond the Pines
8. Wreck-it Ralph
9. Shell
10. In The House



(in reply to R W)
Post #: 22
Wow! - 17/2/2011 7:43:51 PM   
flyaninnocentlife

 

Posts: 17
Joined: 4/12/2006
What a film! When the credits rolled, everyone in the cinema just sat there, taking everything in. The story nicely unravelled, hitting you in small steps rather than a big twists. Andrew Garfield and Carey Mulligan were awesome, some of the best acting I've seen in years! They both have a great career ahead of them.
The only slight negative is the scene near the end, which is also the opening scene. I guessed what was going to happen, and as I had already been close to tears a few minutes before, I was ready to have my heart ripped out...but it wasn't. It was still sad, but I wanted that scene to make me cry.
A really good film, definitely worth seeing and I cant wait to get it on DVD!

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 23
- 22/2/2011 4:28:09 AM   
MartinHeron

 

Posts: 13
Joined: 3/2/2011
It's a testament to how much I loved the film that I'm slightly annoyed Empire only gave it four stars. Just one of the best films I've ever seen.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 24
RE: Never Let Me Go - 22/2/2011 10:32:57 PM   
theoriginalcynic

 

Posts: 6517
Joined: 10/4/2007
quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r

Carey Mulligan is the most boring and annoying (well it's hard to beat Ellen Page) actress around. How she finds work with her pouty Keira Knightly attitude and dull as dishwater roles is beyond me.
Roll on the next period costume drama.


Coming from the Battlestar Galactica fan...watching paint dry comes to mind.  Both Carey and Ellen are great actresses, see Juno and An Education respectively.

(in reply to vad3r)
Post #: 25
RE: Never Let Me Go - 23/2/2011 3:44:30 AM   
Deviation


Posts: 26908
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Enemies of Film HQ
quote:

ORIGINAL: theoriginalcynic

quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r

Carey Mulligan is the most boring and annoying (well it's hard to beat Ellen Page) actress around. How she finds work with her pouty Keira Knightly attitude and dull as dishwater roles is beyond me.
Roll on the next period costume drama.


Coming from the Battlestar Galactica fan...watching paint dry comes to mind.  Both Carey and Ellen are great actresses, see Juno and An Education respectively.



What does BSG have to do with anything?

(also, never use Juno as proof of someone's great acting, NEVER)


_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dpp1978
There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement.

quote:


ORIGINAL: elab49
I really wish I could go down to see Privates

(in reply to theoriginalcynic)
Post #: 26
RE: Never Let Me Go - 23/2/2011 5:32:18 AM   
Qwerty Norris


Posts: 3150
Joined: 26/10/2005
From: Edinburgh
Carey Mulligan & Ellen Page = great

Battlestar Galactica = great

Not really sure why there's a debate here at all...


_____________________________

Qwerty's Top 10 of 2013 (so far)

1. Zero Dark Thirty
2. No
3. In The Fog
4. Good Vibrations
5. McCullin
6. Beyond the Hills
7. The Place Beyond the Pines
8. Wreck-it Ralph
9. Shell
10. In The House



(in reply to Deviation)
Post #: 27
RE: Never Let Me Go - 23/2/2011 9:45:26 AM   
theoriginalcynic

 

Posts: 6517
Joined: 10/4/2007
quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation

quote:

ORIGINAL: theoriginalcynic

quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r

Carey Mulligan is the most boring and annoying (well it's hard to beat Ellen Page) actress around. How she finds work with her pouty Keira Knightly attitude and dull as dishwater roles is beyond me.
Roll on the next period costume drama.


Coming from the Battlestar Galactica fan...watching paint dry comes to mind.  Both Carey and Ellen are great actresses, see Juno and An Education respectively.



What does BSG have to do with anything?

(also, never use Juno as proof of someone's great acting, NEVER)



He's slagging off Carey and Ellen (what does Ellen have to do with anything?) with a BSG avatar. 

(in reply to Deviation)
Post #: 28
RE: Never Let Me Go - 23/2/2011 2:46:31 PM   
Deviation


Posts: 26908
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Enemies of Film HQ
But BSG has nothing to do with NLMG, aside from having an alternate history of sorts and that both can be pretty slow and depressing. 

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dpp1978
There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement.

quote:


ORIGINAL: elab49
I really wish I could go down to see Privates

(in reply to theoriginalcynic)
Post #: 29
RE: Never Let Me Go - 23/2/2011 6:20:47 PM   
vad3r


Posts: 4229
Joined: 3/9/2010
From: Close to Mod HQ

quote:

ORIGINAL: theoriginalcynic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation

quote:

ORIGINAL: theoriginalcynic

quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r

Carey Mulligan is the most boring and annoying (well it's hard to beat Ellen Page) actress around. How she finds work with her pouty Keira Knightly attitude and dull as dishwater roles is beyond me.
Roll on the next period costume drama.


Coming from the Battlestar Galactica fan...watching paint dry comes to mind.  Both Carey and Ellen are great actresses, see Juno and An Education respectively.



What does BSG have to do with anything?

(also, never use Juno as proof of someone's great acting, NEVER)



He's slagging off Carey and Ellen (what does Ellen have to do with anything?) with a BSG avatar. 



Cause Carey and Ellen are shit and BSG is the greatest thing human kind has ever made.
Oh and An Education is just another BBC period drama featuring the most boring performance ever by a 18 year old stuck up middle class snob who acts like she's 50. Yeah she's hot (who isn't??), but that's as far as her attraction goes.


_____________________________

Single Virgin Mod Candidate 2013


quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives
To paraphrase the great man himself:

Vad3r won't go anywhere near this.

(in reply to theoriginalcynic)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> Never Let Me Go Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.125