Emyr Thy King
Posts: 2154
Joined: 13/4/2006 From: The Grid
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: adambatman82 No Country might not be the best point to go from here. True Grit, to me at least, felt like the natural extension of No Country, so if you didn't like TG then No Country might not impress either. It is a very good film tho (and my favourite Coen alongside A Serious Man). What sort of films do you like? The Coen's have covered pretty much every base, so someone ought to be able to recommend something based more closely on your tastes. I liked Barry Pepper a lot. A really complex, morally ambiguous soul, and one that I felt it difficult to read from one scene to another. He's does that whole "bad guy you don't know whether to trust" role really well, and, considering he was following in the footsteps of Robert Duvall, managed to make the role his own. I'll still reserve judgement for "No Country..." since it's adapted from a Cormac McCarthy book and so I expect a different kind of story. There are also others actors such as Javier Bardem and Tommy Lee Jones, so at least it has a different 'make-up' of actors. I like strong character pieces, so I like a good drama, I'm partial to a 'thoughtful' action film if there is such a thing. I like the odd thriller as well. By the way mate, Barry Pepper and Greg Kinnear are starring in the "Kennedys". It's a eight-part mini-series about the 'dynamic duo' of John F. Kennedy and Robert Kennedy. Have a look: Kennedys Greg Kinnear looks like him and he's a good actor. Barry Pepper again looks like he's nailed the part, he's shaping up to be a very good actor. Tom Wilkinson is usually reliable but it has Katie Holmes in it though. I think it'll be on the History Channel over here. quote:
ORIGINAL: TrendMeUp Yawn. How arogant and self absorbed you must be, that when you find yourself disagreeing with the world, you claim that the world is crazy. Also, your opinion of the film has no validity as you haven't even seen it. You've seen 30 minutes of it. If you'd had the patience and sense to stay longer than 30 minutes, you'd have been able to see some people getting shot and that! Maybe that would elevate the film from the infamous critical status of "movie 4 pussies". I'll quote the late Brian Hanrahan: "I counted them all out and I counted them all back" I refer to the number of sheep of which I kept a count whilst watching the film. Within the first 10-15 minutes I did begin to think: "where is this going?" "perhaps it's a slow-burner?". Unfortunately, I wasn't engaged by the material throughout the film and the longer I watched the film, the more I began to find the characters irritating and the story utterly boring. While I disagree with anyone who walks out of a film before its closing credits, an act which is "ignorant" as Paddy Considine would agree. I sympathise with him. quote:
ORIGINAL: jonson Yeah, I picked up on this. When the native American gets ignored, the cinema laughed, as I guess it was supposed to be a joke to show how they were treated in those times, but as they are still treated like that I found it quite disturbing it was used in a humerous way. I laughed myself, but almost felt completely guilty for doing so. It did feel wrong though, you're right IMO. I'm glad that you saw it too. I find it unsavoury and just really gauche. A late edit -- In the review, Angie Errigo said "Not one contraction is to be heard in the film". An erroneous statement. Here's a few examples of contractions in the film: Rooster Cogburn: "That didn't pan out." Rooster Cogburn: "We'll sleep here and follow in the morning." LaBoeuf: "I've just come from Yell County." Mattie Ross: "It can't be helped. I still have to collect father's things and see to some other business." You get the picture.
< Message edited by Emyr Thy King -- 9/3/2011 5:00:49 PM >
_____________________________
"This whole imbroglio is epiphenomenal"...."demigogic faux egalitarianism" - Will Self
|