Flatulent_Bob
Posts: 7788
Joined: 30/9/2005
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Highcontrast What are you on about with master and commander i didn t even mention that film.Ive seen Master and Commander its a good film but i wouldn t say and it is my opinion thats its any weres as good as the Lord of the rings trilogy. You think Spiderman 2 LOTR and Sin City were big disappointments i thought they were excellent films. Theres nothing wrong these films atall thats why EVERY magazine gave them full marks and they have gone down as classics. You said it won awards and yes it won the oscars for ROTK over Master and Commander yet it is a much poorer film. Spiderman 2 is a rehash of the first with little progression for any of the charicters. Sin City is paper thin, stylishly shot but with no real substance in fact its just tits and violence when you get down to it LOTR - PJ ducked out of making a really emotional trillogy to the studios wish for it to be more action friendly and this disapoints me. Especially the concluding part. Jackson also loses control of all his narrative threads that started to unravel within The Two Towers. Of course, this is partly due to the disbandment of the fellowship on their separate ways but it is also partly due Jacksons dot-to-dot style of film making and his inability to bring all of his strands of storyline under control at once. The Extended Editions certainly do go some way to rectifying this but the problem is still very much apparent even when watching those. I find Jacksons direction heavy handed as he signposts its themes to the point where he is virtually patronising his audience he overboils the sentiment to the most saccharine levels in order to achieve yet another "moment”, he panders to almost every cliché in the book (soft focus reunion, longing looks, crass moments of derring-do, etc) and he clumsily allows the score that has served so well in the inital instalment to become over bearing and intrusive. The performances also take a massive nose dive after FOTR, Orlando Bloom, Jonathon Rhys Davies, Christopher Lee are all poor throughout but in Return Of The King the more crucial performances of McKellan and Mortensen start to flag . Of course, there are redeeming features (Bernard Hill is terrific) but on the whole most of the cast struggle with the emotional key changes throughout the film. Especially in the touchy-feely endings. NB the above post has been copied from another LOTR thread one of the many where this has been discussed time and time again.
< Message edited by Flatulent_Bob -- 17/4/2007 10:38:26 AM >
_____________________________
I'm your huckleberry... All the world will be your enemy, Prince of a Thousand enemies. And when they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you; digger, listener, runner, Prince with the swift warning. Be cunning, and full of tricks, and your people will never be destroyed. Oh my God! They banned Kenny!
|