thetruth
Posts: 1548
Joined: 3/8/2011
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Deviation quote:
We dont really see that though,we see this from the persective of two people who represent humanity.And on that note,there's no connection. We see that throughout the entire first act before they get into the forest. It's left right and center throughout, the giant walls, the photojournalist asking people, the wall graffiti, people living in constant fear of an octupi going berserk in a inhabited area...Also, there were big connections in The Mist, connections that led to religious lunacy, survival and death. And no, they never represented humanity. quote:
As for the term,"end of the world",it's just a general term-how many films,be they involving natural disasters/aliens/monsters actually see the end of the world? Exactly, none of which applies to Monsters as the movie follows the world living its normal life as best as it can after a small portion of Mexico and the US gets colonized by the creatures. It's not even close to being the end of the world and it never was. It was a "some big problems in the American/Mexican border which got mostly contained" scenario. quote:
There's always a contrived nonsensical redemption at the end,cause we all cant die-it wont sell! What are you talking about? You know that the film SPOILERS is a flashback. quote:
As regards it and The Mist,irrespective of genre,there is a redemptive journey and a fight for survival for the central characters.We dont see that much of the rest of the world.The Mist certainly does it for me on a more personal claustrophobic intensity. So you're saying that 80% of American cinema is the same becuase they have a redemptive storyline? Also, what redemptive journey in The Mist? It leads to the SPOILERS the strongest characters committing suicide, a father killing his son and him going insane when help was only miles away. It's a tale about the loss of hope and the need to keep it, not redemption. Also, do we get to see the rest of the world in Stake Land, Dawn of the Dead, Night of the Living Dead, Stalker, Planet Terror and a million other horror/sci-fi films? Are you saying all these films are the same? Also, the event only happened in the Mexican/States border, the rest of the world was left untouched. quote:
And there are very few monsters in Monsters-there are more people! Yeah, so what? The two central characters in the film do represent the only 2 dimensional humans in it. The rest are cliched cannon fodder.They are background noise. The film plays like a road movie where nothing really happens.They should have cast Robert and Zach and then we might have had something worth watching. As regards the Mist,yes you can argue about redemption and its existence there,but that is the point.Above all the religious bigotry,the staring at death and all the issues that entails,there isnt any redemption. Monsters for me not only visually disappoints,it raises no questions of morals or sense of being.As such events do. Again,the "world" in question is a mere backdrop to the protagonists involved.The Mexican border or the local store should involve situations/decisions/dilemas of a similar nature. Monsters is only short of someone in a monster suit popping out of the bushes and shouting "boo!!". Seperately,i was being critical of these type of movies in general-say like 2012 where no matter how bad things get,the main people survive.That obviously wasnt relevant to the structure here. I'm saying very very few films take on the challenge without going down the familiar route.Invasion of the body snatchers a notable exception. And yes,the title/promos for Monsters was misleading.
_____________________________
Without love we are dead Protect children from vile and obscene videos
|