dgribble
Posts: 226
Joined: 20/2/2008
|
Ok first off essentially everyone loves these movies...admit it why else do they make da money. Come on most video adaption’s are lucky if they get a sequel (which normally sinks it). But Resident Evil has spawned a quadrilogy, let's face it the franchise has broken the video-film curse. Now about the movie, firstly it's a video game adaption, second it's a sci-fi zombie flick, a well made one, but a monster movie at heart. Monster movies are known or meant to not have or need a well devised plot, or well written Characters (Chris Redfield). So we can let Resident Evil slide on that. What these movies are meant to do is entertain! and that’s what Afterlife does. Yes you may have to put up with the pausing between action to listen the plot or have the characters put in some screen time so you care whether they snuff it or not (which you don't here, although Boris Kodjoe does a good job). Now where movies like AVATAR sacrificed action in favour for a rehashed plot that you'd seen 20 times, Afterlife does the opposite, the plot (if you call it that) is essentially a little reminder that pops up now and again. Afterlife is the action 3D flick you've been waiting for, with plenty of throwing stars, giant axes, bullets, reflective sunglasses, and even coins being thrown to the screen, (looking surprisingly realistic and awesome!). Inother words, in terms of action its what Avatar should have been, explosions and slo-motion gun play galore, the highlights being the clone battle, the executioner fight and every scene featuring a scene stealing Shawn Roberts having a ball hamming it up as Wesker. He perfectly balances the diabolical side and the camp side of Wesker seen in the games. To round off, this may save 3D from going back to a forgotten gimmick. See now, before it’s reduced to 2D.
|