mattjtemp
Posts: 208
Joined: 30/9/2005
|
I thought Jackson's Kong was a bad film, only saw it the once in the cinema, but for me it was too much budget and elbow room given to a director who had shown his propensity for bloating a film when given enough rope (just compare the first Lord of the Rings to the last).. The character development, especially of the crew, seemed pointless, more like filler, as ultimately they were just fodder, compare that to the secondary character development in Heat which is much more paired down and more efficient, by showing a group meal out on both sides and other smaller examples. The other part that lost me with Kong was the manipulation of its own rules, I'm fine for believing in a gigantic ape, or aliens, or even the plot lines in some Rom-Coms, I can suspend with the best of them, but there must be rules within that, a character can't do one thing, then not be able to do it later, or weigh a certain amount one time and not later. There was a dinosaur stampede at one point, the darting in between the legs went beyond flash action direction into farce, same with old Watts her name being flipped around like a pancake yet lesser mortals being easily killed. It felt all together Bay-esque at times, and though the original is rough and dated it is such a seminal piece it deserved better than that. It looked beautiful at times, especially setting it in the same era, but ultimately, for me, it felt bloated, self indulgent and even a tad pretentious, which is tricky to achieve given its genre.
_____________________________
'I need your clothes, your boots, and your unicycle'
|