Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie Musings >> RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 3:48:09 PM   
chris kilby

 

Posts: 1261
Joined: 31/3/2010

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rgirvan44

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation

The Robocop remake backlash is a bit unfair, it's made by a director who has made two (out of three, with Elite Squad 2 being The Wire in two hours set in Brazil) excellent films in his CV and is as much an unorthodox choice for the film as Verhoeven was. It could be good, especially as Elite Squad 2 had three excellent action sequences and a hell load of politics going on, and it still did them superbly well.




This is my thinking - and also it is hardly like the Robocop franchise was any great success outside of the first film.

If two bad sequels, two kids shows, a live action kid friendly TV show and four really bad low budget TV movies couldn't destroy the first film, this remake won't affect it much either if it turns out bad.


My feeling exactly. I don't have a particular problem with duff sequels or remakes. (Or cover versions, for that matter.) You can always ignore them. I can happily watch the first two Godfathers without thinking about the third - which wasn't that bad, just nowhere near as good as the other two. It's not like they round up and burn every copy of the original. Er, like wot used to happen during the silent era, apparently...

(in reply to Rgirvan44)
Post #: 121
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 3:49:22 PM   
chris kilby

 

Posts: 1261
Joined: 31/3/2010

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rgirvan44

quote:

ORIGINAL: elab49

quote:

bit
quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation

The Robocop remake backlash is a bit unfair, it's made by a director who has made two (out of three, with Elite Squad 2 being The Wire in two hours set in Brazil) excellent films in his CV and is as much an unorthodox choice for the film as Verhoeven was. It could be good, especially as Elite Squad 2 had three excellent action sequences and a hell load of politics going on, and it still did them superbly well.




Away and boil yer heid. IMO  Bus 74 is a very self-conscious doc, Elite Squad was dreadful. The only reason 2 was better was in comparison.



You are speaking in Scots more and more elab. I am concerned you are morphing into Boaby.


As long as she isnae morphin' intae a boaby!

(Speaking of which...)

(in reply to Rgirvan44)
Post #: 122
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 3:53:36 PM   
homersimpson_esq


Posts: 20117
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Springfield
Oh, I think I see what is coming now.

_____________________________

That deep-browed Homer ruled as his demesne.


Bristol Bad Film Club
A place where movie fans can come and behold some of the most awful films ever put to celluloid.

(in reply to chris kilby)
Post #: 123
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 3:55:25 PM   
vad3r


Posts: 4403
Joined: 3/9/2010
From: Close to Mod HQ

quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives


quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r


quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives


quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r

The Hobbit -

Looks absolutely dire is putting it mildly. As a huge fan of LotR this is the EXACT OPPOSITE of those films. Where's the darkness? Why is Aragorn son of Arathorn, Legolas and Sean Bean now a bunch of annoying dwarves and hobbits? Why is there jokes and dwarf 'comedy'?
Please do not give me the 'but it's a kids book and not LotR''. Make it an adult film then. Why put EXACTLY what's in the book on film. Have some balls and makes changes for a film adaptation of a book made 75 years ago.



But, erm, it is isn't it?


And? Why should that stop a film being something entirely different?

I for one and pretty much everyone else doesn't want to watch a Middle Earth kids film.


Erm, because the director and writer love the book and want to make a faithful adaptation of it? I can understand why you personally don't want to watch it (me neither to be honest as LOTR has never particularly floated my boat) but I'm baffled as to why you think the filmakers have a responsibility to completely alter what (I'm presuming) the fans of the book love about it in the first place.
Unless you just want a dead hobbit in the cellar?


It's always amazed me how filmmakers feel they have to copy a book meticulously and put it on the screen. Critics even mark films down for any detail that's not 100% faithful to the book.
What's the point of it all? No book is perfect and the author has nothing to do with the film. Why not put a Jedi in The Hobbit? Why not have a black Superman? Why make a film knowing there is a clear, obvious improvement that can be made from something in the book and do nothing about implementing it? Why having read a book would you want to watch an identical translation on film? Would you not be more excited knowing a filmmaker has his own interpretation of the source material?

_____________________________

Single Virgin Mod Candidate 2013


quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives
To paraphrase the great man himself:

Vad3r won't go anywhere near this.

(in reply to horribleives)
Post #: 124
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:01:40 PM   
Deviation


Posts: 27284
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Enemies of Film HQ
I kinda agree with you on the second point, yet not on the reasons for this adaptation. The Hobbit was a kid's book written for kids. LOTR was darker but still close to the book in many areas, like the tone. It's only expected that Jackson would stay close to the tone to The Hobbit like he did with LOTR, something he was very accliamed for. Considering the plot of The Hobbit, it's probably a good thing.

Also, why would that be wrong anyway? There are things that are worrying me about it (oh now you're are splitting it into three?) but the tone is only expected. Also what on Earth makes you think that keeping it dark and horror will still keep it good? Remember, dark and gritty is not always good.

< Message edited by Deviation -- 28/8/2012 4:02:30 PM >


_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dpp1978
There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement.

quote:


ORIGINAL: elab49
I really wish I could go down to see Privates

(in reply to vad3r)
Post #: 125
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:02:35 PM   
horribleives

 

Posts: 5048
Joined: 12/6/2009
From: The North
I'm all for changing things - you could make Superman a mackem for all I care - but I don't see the benefit in turning a kids' book into an adult film, thus depriving the people it was intended for the freedom to see it.

_____________________________

www.hollywoodunbound.co.uk - some nonsense about alien film directors and musclebound man-children.

(in reply to vad3r)
Post #: 126
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:02:50 PM   
elab49


Posts: 54557
Joined: 1/10/2005
You know, I'm guessing you've never actually read Lord of the Rings given you don't seem to know what differences there actually were in transference to the screen.

I'm guessing you haven't read The Hobbit either (beyond a Wiki glance) - but as long as you can keep digging it's a good film to go with..


_____________________________

Lips Together and Blow - blogtasticness and Glasgow Film Festival GFF13!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation] LIKE AMERICA'S SWEETHEARTS TOO. IT MADE ME LAUGH A LOT AND THOUGHT IT WAS WITTY. ALSO I FEEL SLOWLY DYING INSIDE. I KEEP AGREEING WITH ELAB.


Annual Poll 2013 - All Lists Welcome

(in reply to vad3r)
Post #: 127
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:07:03 PM   
Deviation


Posts: 27284
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Enemies of Film HQ
Only the fools miss Bombadil or descriptions of nature which on screen would even be found excessive by Malick and Bela Tarr.

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dpp1978
There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement.

quote:


ORIGINAL: elab49
I really wish I could go down to see Privates

(in reply to elab49)
Post #: 128
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:09:49 PM   
horribleives

 

Posts: 5048
Joined: 12/6/2009
From: The North

quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r


quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives


quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r


quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives


quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r

The Hobbit -

Looks absolutely dire is putting it mildly. As a huge fan of LotR this is the EXACT OPPOSITE of those films. Where's the darkness? Why is Aragorn son of Arathorn, Legolas and Sean Bean now a bunch of annoying dwarves and hobbits? Why is there jokes and dwarf 'comedy'?
Please do not give me the 'but it's a kids book and not LotR''. Make it an adult film then. Why put EXACTLY what's in the book on film. Have some balls and makes changes for a film adaptation of a book made 75 years ago.



But, erm, it is isn't it?


And? Why should that stop a film being something entirely different?

I for one and pretty much everyone else doesn't want to watch a Middle Earth kids film.


Erm, because the director and writer love the book and want to make a faithful adaptation of it? I can understand why you personally don't want to watch it (me neither to be honest as LOTR has never particularly floated my boat) but I'm baffled as to why you think the filmakers have a responsibility to completely alter what (I'm presuming) the fans of the book love about it in the first place.
Unless you just want a dead hobbit in the cellar?


It's always amazed me how filmmakers feel they have to copy a book meticulously and put it on the screen. Critics even mark films down for any detail that's not 100% faithful to the book.
What's the point of it all? No book is perfect and the author has nothing to do with the film. Why not put a Jedi in The Hobbit? Why not have a black Superman? Why make a film knowing there is a clear, obvious improvement that can be made from something in the book and do nothing about implementing it? Why having read a book would you want to watch an identical translation on film? Would you not be more excited knowing a filmmaker has his own interpretation of the source material?


But a couple of pages ago you were praising the original LOTR movies for being faithful to the books. Now you're saying you'd rather filmakers tore up the blueprint. Cool, by that rationale I can assume you wouldn't have had any problems if Jackson and co. had ditched the darkness first time round and filmed the entire trilogy as musical starring cuddly puppets voiced by Britney Spears and Justin Timberlake?

_____________________________

www.hollywoodunbound.co.uk - some nonsense about alien film directors and musclebound man-children.

(in reply to vad3r)
Post #: 129
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:15:14 PM   
Deviation


Posts: 27284
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Enemies of Film HQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdXQJS3Yv0Y

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dpp1978
There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement.

quote:


ORIGINAL: elab49
I really wish I could go down to see Privates

(in reply to horribleives)
Post #: 130
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:17:09 PM   
vad3r


Posts: 4403
Joined: 3/9/2010
From: Close to Mod HQ
Like I said in my first post, I understand The Hobbit IS a kids book. My point is that if it was altered into something more sinister and dark like LotR it would be so much more appealing to adults and it's fan base than the light hearted Narnia-eque family fantasy/screwball dwarf comedy that we have now.
If only instead of Jackson and Walsh (Tolkien's no.1 fans) we had a fearless director like Aronofksy/Fincher/Winding Refn and Del Toro as a producer to collaborate with.
And like someone else mentioned, Martin Freeman? Woeful miscasting.


_____________________________

Single Virgin Mod Candidate 2013


quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives
To paraphrase the great man himself:

Vad3r won't go anywhere near this.

(in reply to elab49)
Post #: 131
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:18:18 PM   
Harry Tuttle


Posts: 7993
Joined: 12/11/2005
From: Sometime in the future.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation

Only the fools miss Bombadil or descriptions of nature which on screen would even be found excessive by Malick and Bela Tarr.


Agreed.

I remember being a bit annoyed that the whole Weathertop sequence was significantly different in the film than in the book (which was unavoidable due to the omission of Bombadil and the Barrow-wight) but otherwise none of the changes really bothered me that much.

_____________________________

Acting...Naturaaal

Your knowledge of scientific biological transmogrification is only outmatched by your zest for kung-fu treachery!

Blood Island. So called because it's the exact shape of some blood

(in reply to Deviation)
Post #: 132
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:18:31 PM   
vad3r


Posts: 4403
Joined: 3/9/2010
From: Close to Mod HQ

quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives


quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r


quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives


quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r


quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives


quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r

The Hobbit -

Looks absolutely dire is putting it mildly. As a huge fan of LotR this is the EXACT OPPOSITE of those films. Where's the darkness? Why is Aragorn son of Arathorn, Legolas and Sean Bean now a bunch of annoying dwarves and hobbits? Why is there jokes and dwarf 'comedy'?
Please do not give me the 'but it's a kids book and not LotR''. Make it an adult film then. Why put EXACTLY what's in the book on film. Have some balls and makes changes for a film adaptation of a book made 75 years ago.



But, erm, it is isn't it?


And? Why should that stop a film being something entirely different?

I for one and pretty much everyone else doesn't want to watch a Middle Earth kids film.


Erm, because the director and writer love the book and want to make a faithful adaptation of it? I can understand why you personally don't want to watch it (me neither to be honest as LOTR has never particularly floated my boat) but I'm baffled as to why you think the filmakers have a responsibility to completely alter what (I'm presuming) the fans of the book love about it in the first place.
Unless you just want a dead hobbit in the cellar?


It's always amazed me how filmmakers feel they have to copy a book meticulously and put it on the screen. Critics even mark films down for any detail that's not 100% faithful to the book.
What's the point of it all? No book is perfect and the author has nothing to do with the film. Why not put a Jedi in The Hobbit? Why not have a black Superman? Why make a film knowing there is a clear, obvious improvement that can be made from something in the book and do nothing about implementing it? Why having read a book would you want to watch an identical translation on film? Would you not be more excited knowing a filmmaker has his own interpretation of the source material?


But a couple of pages ago you were praising the original LOTR movies for being faithful to the books. Now you're saying you'd rather filmakers tore up the blueprint. Cool, by that rationale I can assume you wouldn't have had any problems if Jackson and co. had ditched the darkness first time round and filmed the entire trilogy as musical starring cuddly puppets voiced by Britney Spears and Justin Timberlake?


I certainly did not. Quote please?

_____________________________

Single Virgin Mod Candidate 2013


quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives
To paraphrase the great man himself:

Vad3r won't go anywhere near this.

(in reply to horribleives)
Post #: 133
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:18:44 PM   
elab49


Posts: 54557
Joined: 1/10/2005
Have you read LOTR? Do you think it's a literal translation to the film? 

_____________________________

Lips Together and Blow - blogtasticness and Glasgow Film Festival GFF13!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation] LIKE AMERICA'S SWEETHEARTS TOO. IT MADE ME LAUGH A LOT AND THOUGHT IT WAS WITTY. ALSO I FEEL SLOWLY DYING INSIDE. I KEEP AGREEING WITH ELAB.


Annual Poll 2013 - All Lists Welcome

(in reply to vad3r)
Post #: 134
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:20:30 PM   
Prophet_of_Doom

 

Posts: 754
Joined: 15/2/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r


quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives


quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r


quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives


quote:

ORIGINAL: vad3r

The Hobbit -

Looks absolutely dire is putting it mildly. As a huge fan of LotR this is the EXACT OPPOSITE of those films. Where's the darkness? Why is Aragorn son of Arathorn, Legolas and Sean Bean now a bunch of annoying dwarves and hobbits? Why is there jokes and dwarf 'comedy'?
Please do not give me the 'but it's a kids book and not LotR''. Make it an adult film then. Why put EXACTLY what's in the book on film. Have some balls and makes changes for a film adaptation of a book made 75 years ago.



But, erm, it is isn't it?


And? Why should that stop a film being something entirely different?

I for one and pretty much everyone else doesn't want to watch a Middle Earth kids film.


Erm, because the director and writer love the book and want to make a faithful adaptation of it? I can understand why you personally don't want to watch it (me neither to be honest as LOTR has never particularly floated my boat) but I'm baffled as to why you think the filmakers have a responsibility to completely alter what (I'm presuming) the fans of the book love about it in the first place.
Unless you just want a dead hobbit in the cellar?


It's always amazed me how filmmakers feel they have to copy a book meticulously and put it on the screen. Critics even mark films down for any detail that's not 100% faithful to the book.
What's the point of it all? No book is perfect and the author has nothing to do with the film. Why not put a Jedi in The Hobbit? Why not have a black Superman? Why make a film knowing there is a clear, obvious improvement that can be made from something in the book and do nothing about implementing it? Why having read a book would you want to watch an identical translation on film? Would you not be more excited knowing a filmmaker has his own interpretation of the source material?


The simple answer is - they don't. You're taking one example and making a sweeping generalisation across all and every adaptation. Jackson loves Tolkein and therefore wants to be faithful. But was Sneider faithful to Watchmen? Was Coppola faithful to Heart of Darkness? Was Weitz faithful to His Dark Materials? No, no and no.

What you have to remember is as often as not it's not just about the film maker - it's about the screenwriter who makes the decisions, or a producer making decisions based upon whether or not he wants to appeal to a guaranteed fanbase.

(in reply to vad3r)
Post #: 135
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:21:43 PM   
Deviation


Posts: 27284
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Enemies of Film HQ
Narnia still managed to appeal to adults, as did Harry Potter. Dark and gritty does not mean quality nor adult. Put this in your head.

Also, the idea of a Fincher, Refn (whose last voyages in the more fantasy stuff weren't great) and Aronofsky's LOTR is on the level of Gaspar Noe's Peter Pan on the level of silly choices of directors. Del Toro wouldn't probably have made anything much darker either, remember Hellboy and Hellboy 2? How dark and gritty was that?



< Message edited by Deviation -- 28/8/2012 4:22:21 PM >


_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dpp1978
There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement.

quote:


ORIGINAL: elab49
I really wish I could go down to see Privates

(in reply to vad3r)
Post #: 136
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:23:00 PM   
homersimpson_esq


Posts: 20117
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Springfield

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation

Narnia still managed to appeal to adults



No it didn't. It was shit. Narnia the books are amazing. The films are soulless and horrid.

_____________________________

That deep-browed Homer ruled as his demesne.


Bristol Bad Film Club
A place where movie fans can come and behold some of the most awful films ever put to celluloid.

(in reply to Deviation)
Post #: 137
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:23:47 PM   
Harry Tuttle


Posts: 7993
Joined: 12/11/2005
From: Sometime in the future.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation

Narnia still managed to appeal to adults, as did Harry Potter. Dark and gritty does not mean quality nor adult. Put this in your head.

Also, the idea of a Fincher, Refn (whose last voyages in the more fantasy stuff weren't great) and Aronofsky's LOTR is on the level of Gaspar Noe's Peter Pan on the level of silly choices of directors. Del Toro wouldn't probably have made anything much darker either, remember Hellboy and Hellboy 2? How dark and gritty was that?




A pox on you and your family .

Valhalla Rising is a great film.



_____________________________

Acting...Naturaaal

Your knowledge of scientific biological transmogrification is only outmatched by your zest for kung-fu treachery!

Blood Island. So called because it's the exact shape of some blood

(in reply to Deviation)
Post #: 138
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:24:40 PM   
Deviation


Posts: 27284
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Enemies of Film HQ

quote:

ORIGINAL: homersimpson_esq


quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation

Narnia still managed to appeal to adults



No it didn't. It was shit. Narnia the books are amazing. The films are soulless and horrid.


And I still know adults who like them and want to watch them.

Even if the third one was the only one I came close to quite liking.

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dpp1978
There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement.

quote:


ORIGINAL: elab49
I really wish I could go down to see Privates

(in reply to homersimpson_esq)
Post #: 139
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:24:58 PM   
vad3r


Posts: 4403
Joined: 3/9/2010
From: Close to Mod HQ

quote:

ORIGINAL: elab49

Have you read LOTR? Do you think it's a literal translation to the film? 


I haven't read the books bar snippets, no. It wouldn't change my love for the films in the slightest if I read them and they were either identical or completely different to the films. I judge films of it's own merits not it's source.

_____________________________

Single Virgin Mod Candidate 2013


quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives
To paraphrase the great man himself:

Vad3r won't go anywhere near this.

(in reply to elab49)
Post #: 140
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:26:07 PM   
Deviation


Posts: 27284
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Enemies of Film HQ
quote:



A pox on you and your family .

Valhalla Rising is a great film.


Half of it is a great film, yes indeed.

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dpp1978
There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement.

quote:


ORIGINAL: elab49
I really wish I could go down to see Privates

(in reply to Deviation)
Post #: 141
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:26:22 PM   
horribleives

 

Posts: 5048
Joined: 12/6/2009
From: The North

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdXQJS3Yv0Y


Aww how cute, I only ever saw that once and totally forgot about the songs. I hope there's some good 'uns in The Hobbit.
They're not wrong either (about the whole 'whip' and 'way' thing).

_____________________________

www.hollywoodunbound.co.uk - some nonsense about alien film directors and musclebound man-children.

(in reply to Deviation)
Post #: 142
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:26:48 PM   
elab49


Posts: 54557
Joined: 1/10/2005
So you aren't aware that they aren't a literal translation of the books?

In which case I wonder why you're making such a big song and dance about the same people making The Hobbit -given they've already clearly shown they don't literally translate.



_____________________________

Lips Together and Blow - blogtasticness and Glasgow Film Festival GFF13!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation] LIKE AMERICA'S SWEETHEARTS TOO. IT MADE ME LAUGH A LOT AND THOUGHT IT WAS WITTY. ALSO I FEEL SLOWLY DYING INSIDE. I KEEP AGREEING WITH ELAB.


Annual Poll 2013 - All Lists Welcome

(in reply to vad3r)
Post #: 143
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:27:52 PM   
giggity

 

Posts: 288
Joined: 4/3/2012
okay i know i haven't been on this board long but i'm convinced Vad3r is either a troll or 13 years old. Someone correct me if i'm wrong.

Anyway, on the subject of Robocop remake, I would like to keep an open mind but after reading this script review http://collider.com/robocop-remake-script-review/188614/

and then reading this article
http://collider.com/jose-padilha-robocop-remake-hell/191494/

I really think we're in for a dud, it could have been something interesting but now my expectations are very low.

< Message edited by giggity -- 28/8/2012 4:28:38 PM >

(in reply to vad3r)
Post #: 144
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:29:33 PM   
Prophet_of_Doom

 

Posts: 754
Joined: 15/2/2006

quote:

ORIGINAL: homersimpson_esq


quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation

Narnia still managed to appeal to adults



No it didn't. It was shit. Narnia the books are amazing. The films are soulless and horrid.


Have you read them recently hse? I was quite surprised ... the film prompted me to go back and read them and I thought the writing was terrible. I mean, embarrassingly bad! Whereas I can read Fantastic Mr Fox (or at least force it upon my baby daughter) and still think "that's brilliant!"

(in reply to homersimpson_esq)
Post #: 145
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:31:10 PM   
Rgirvan44


Posts: 19049
Joined: 10/3/2006
From: Punishment Park
quote:

ORIGINAL: giggity

okay i know i haven't been on this board long but i'm convinced Vad3r is either a troll or 13 years old. Someone correct me if i'm wrong.

Anyway, on the subject of Robocop remake, I would like to keep an open mind but after reading this script review http://collider.com/robocop-remake-script-review/188614/

and then reading this article
http://collider.com/jose-padilha-robocop-remake-hell/191494/

I really think we're in for a dud, it could have been something interesting but now my expectations are very low.


Scripts get re-written all the time - who knows what draft that was?

And similar reports were coming out of Dredd - and that appears to have turned out ok.

_____________________________

It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to, than I have ever known.


(in reply to giggity)
Post #: 146
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:32:12 PM   
elab49


Posts: 54557
Joined: 1/10/2005
quote:

ORIGINAL: giggity

okay i know i haven't been on this board long but i'm convinced Vad3r is either a troll or 13 years old. Someone correct me if i'm wrong.


Is that tumbleweed I see there?..........

Ditto Homer on Narnia films - shit

Not ditto Homer on books.


_____________________________

Lips Together and Blow - blogtasticness and Glasgow Film Festival GFF13!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation] LIKE AMERICA'S SWEETHEARTS TOO. IT MADE ME LAUGH A LOT AND THOUGHT IT WAS WITTY. ALSO I FEEL SLOWLY DYING INSIDE. I KEEP AGREEING WITH ELAB.


Annual Poll 2013 - All Lists Welcome

(in reply to giggity)
Post #: 147
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:33:49 PM   
chris kilby

 

Posts: 1261
Joined: 31/3/2010

quote:

ORIGINAL: homersimpson_esq

The plot holes one was the one that I commented in-thread on, and that was pre-tty negative. Affectionately picking holes in favourite films?


Fixed that for you.

If you have a problem with that particular thread, I suggest you take it up with EMPIRE. It was inspired by an article which appeared in the magazine ten years ago. It's Only A Movie, But... II, where such luminaries as Kim Newman - you've heard of him? - "laboriously picked holes" in their favourite films. But then, being a big, bad mod and all, you clearly know better than the likes of him.

If, on the other hand, you have a problem with me... Well, I suppose I'll just have to get over that, won't I?

Incidentally, subject of a joke/satire over here, target over there? Yes? No? The whole point of that Plot Holes thread which still bafflingly escapes your no-doubt rigorous attention and forensic mind (even though I spelled it out clearly in the OP) is that no film is perfect. All films, all works of fiction, have plot holes/flaws in them. Even the best ones. Including Shakespeare, Dickens and beyond. No work of fiction could ever hope to withstand the frankly tedious levels of scrutiny all movies are routinely subjected to online by uptight fanboys with way too much to prove. I realise you have bad reading habits (you told me yourself - does "tl, dr" ring any bells? Maybe if you'd actually bothered to read those instead of making a big show of not reading them - say, what? - you'd have a less biased impression of me than what you've gleaned from what were some rather glib and throwaway bits of nonsense.)

The subject of that thread was plot holes. The point of that thread (which I now suspect you are deliberately avoiding - maybe you're allergic or something) was the futility and pointless reductionism of endlessly pointing them out because, well, where's the fun in that? Unless the filmmakers are taking the piss, I don't get overly-excited about even egregious plot-holes - or I wouldn't enjoy The Dark Knight Trilogy so much, would I? I don't make a habit of pointing plot holes out to score points or feel superior in some way. No, I just do it for cheap laughs. You could say it's my motivation in life. I think there's more than enough po-faced seriousness to go round already, especially online. Don't you?

As you yourself so eloquently put it: fuck sake!

(It's ironic, but I think we are actually in broad agreement on this score, you and I. Which you would realise if you could stop grabbing the wrong end of the stick and beating about the bush with it for five minutes. It is entirely possible that you are completely wrong about me and have been wilfully misinterpreting everything I say. Playing to the gallery, perhaps? Some people must be very easily impressed. But that's OK, cos I seriously doubt I'm wrong about you. It's a shame, really. You and I probably could and should have been friends. If you weren't... well, you. Oh dear. How sad. Never mind.)

(in reply to homersimpson_esq)
Post #: 148
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:36:03 PM   
vad3r


Posts: 4403
Joined: 3/9/2010
From: Close to Mod HQ

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviation

Dark and gritty does not mean quality nor adult. Put this in your head.


Like I said, it depends on the film. Would Toy Story benefit from an R? No. Would Terminator? Yes.

Dark and gritty does not = quality. They do however, have the power to make films more intriguing, unpredictable and unique if used correctly. I'd always prefer to watch something more adult orientated than be given a version to appeal to a broader range of people and not be in danger of offending anyone.

_____________________________

Single Virgin Mod Candidate 2013


quote:

ORIGINAL: horribleives
To paraphrase the great man himself:

Vad3r won't go anywhere near this.

(in reply to Deviation)
Post #: 149
RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck - 28/8/2012 4:36:43 PM   
Rgirvan44


Posts: 19049
Joined: 10/3/2006
From: Punishment Park
Teehee.

_____________________________

It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to, than I have ever known.


(in reply to chris kilby)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie Musings >> RE: Big anticipated films you predict will suck Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.125