Chloe

Follow @empiremagazine

Forum Home

Register for Free!

Log In

Moderator Tickets

FAQ

Users Online

Chloe

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> Chloe

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Chloe - 8/3/2010 8:45:16 PM

Empire Admin

Posts: 26526
Joined: 29/6/2005

Post your comments on this article

Post #: 1

Chloe - the soft porn experience...... - 8/3/2010 8:45:17 PM

filmsunlimited

Posts: 95
Joined: 20/2/2009

SPOILERS!!

An intriguing premise doesnt take long to develop into soft-porn lesbianism (your reviewer was not quite right - this IS practically a B movie in places!) although the fac t that this temptress then gets involved with the son! creates a weird love triangle you didnt perhaps coming.
Absolutely ripe for spin-offs on the Adult Channel or the top shelf of your local DVD store. A surprise some of this stuff passes as a 15 at times.
Best enjoyed on DVD with a well known brand beginning with K and ending in X?

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 2

RE: Chloe - the soft porn experience...... - 8/3/2010 8:56:36 PM

mediarats

Posts: 314
Joined: 28/2/2009
From: some wainscotting

The original Nathalie had Fanny Ardant and Emmanuelle B�art.

However good this might be, it hasn't got Fanny Ardant and Emmanuelle B�art. I'll be giving it a miss.

(in reply to filmsunlimited)

Post #: 3

Chloe - 13/5/2010 8:34:12 PM

Soprano168

Posts: 47
Joined: 17/9/2009

There is strong talent in this and i think Amanda Seyfried is on the road to be a bieng a good actress. Its all rather wasted here because its trashy and ultimately soft porn.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 4

soft porn - 25/7/2010 3:12:24 PM

Bighousewill

Posts: 244
Joined: 5/12/2009

MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS Just when the film starts to get good into thriller territory it ends. Also I don't find it believable that Amanda Seyfried can play Chloe a high class prostitute because she looks so young gorgeous though she is. And also I don't think this film is age appropriate if a 15 year old were to watch this they would be subjected to graphic description of sex acts which is really just more of an adult theme which is why I think this film should be an 18.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 5

- 2/8/2010 7:37:18 PM

djphilips

Posts: 104
Joined: 26/12/2008
From: Malta

A film with its heart in the right place but its hand in the wrong one, Chloe is a classic case of brilliant premise gone wrong. The fact that Moore suspects her husband Neeson of being unfaithful and employs Seyfried to find out if he is makes sure that the film starts out superbly - the three lead actors have their plates deliciously full and themes and characters are comfortably in place. So what goes wrong? Wilson's script simply fails on the credibility level. It's highly doubtful that what takes place in Chloe would transpire in real life, and if it would, then writer and director don't team up well enough to convince the viewer of this fact. As a result, Seyfried's performance (while admireable in its own right) feels strangely out of place, and since the film in question is no fantasy or science fiction epic, Chloe doesn't really provoke the audience as much as it would like to.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 6

Ain't That Good. - 21/9/2010 9:33:41 AM

joanna likes films

Posts: 987
Joined: 27/10/2007
From: Bexhill

Chole ain't a good movie. Why? Because it's very predictable of what's going to happen and could see the twist from a mile of. Sure the three top stars give good pefomances but basically, this film is just porn and shocking of how it got away with a 15. Not recommened.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 7

- 3/11/2010 12:01:26 PM

reminn

Posts: 142
Joined: 22/10/2010

Fair.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 8