Wolverine Sequel Shooting In January?

Follow @empiremagazine

Forum Home

Register for Free!

Log In

Moderator Tickets

FAQ

Users Online

Wolverine Sequel Shooting In January?

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie News >> Wolverine Sequel Shooting In January?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Wolverine Sequel Shooting In January? - 3/3/2010 11:47:11 PM

Empire Admin

Posts: 26334
Joined: 29/6/2005

Post your comments on this article

Post #: 1

GOD HELP US All - 3/3/2010 11:47:11 PM

RoyalRyan87

Posts: 25
Joined: 3/3/2010

Dear chaps my claws are crossed, as well as my toes, ears, eyes, legs, arms, internal organs, OH! and my.................. never mind. This film is already starting to smell like our national cheese, that being stilton of course.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 2

Oh For Fuu... - 4/3/2010 7:45:50 AM

dgribble

Posts: 226
Joined: 20/2/2008

X-Men Origins...was...a...good..movie, get it into your skull empire, (although for the magazine that gave, X3, Transformers 2, Batman Forever, On Deadly Ground, and Push three stars I suppose that would be difficult.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 3

- 4/3/2010 8:41:28 AM

crazymoviesdude

Posts: 471
Joined: 16/12/2005

@dgribble, If you can deal with massive contrivances and huge plot holes, and you like your action souless and not greatly spectacular, then yeah, it's a good movie. By the same token, if you can deal with all that stuff, then all the films you mentioned could be considered good.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 4

- 4/3/2010 9:10:47 AM

Mr Grizzly

Posts: 147
Joined: 22/9/2006
From: London

Let's hope McQuarrie's script remains intact...

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 5

- 4/3/2010 9:10:48 AM

Mr Grizzly

Posts: 147
Joined: 22/9/2006
From: London

Let's hope McQuarrie's script remains intact...

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 6

X-Men Origins: Wolverine was not a good film - 4/3/2010 9:25:16 AM

Marwood

Posts: 2615
Joined: 1/10/2005
From: Only The Shadow knows

But it wasn't terrible; it was just really bland, cliche and suffered the X3 problem of stuffing in loads of needless mutant cameos for "cool effects" rather than "cohesive plot". It smacked of a studio cookie cutter rush job and shows that Fox lost the plot on their mutant franchise with X3.

I'd still be interested to see a sequel because Hugh is always great as Logan but it has a lot of mistakes to correct from the first one.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 7

- 4/3/2010 11:15:13 AM

AstroZombie

Posts: 53
Joined: 8/8/2009

Well heres hoping it follows millers and clairmonts mini-series

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 8

- 4/3/2010 12:46:18 PM

chris wootton

Posts: 382
Joined: 15/9/2006

The first one was alright, dodgy effects in some scenes and definitely rushed but no worse than the other big movies of last year. Couldn't give a shit about a sequel though

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 9

- 4/3/2010 12:52:58 PM

Filmfan 2

Posts: 973
Joined: 30/9/2005

I enjoyed the first Wolverine film.

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 10

Had they focused - 4/3/2010 4:27:07 PM

mighty mick

Posts: 150
Joined: 8/12/2006

more on the Origin graphic novel and knew how to calibrate the amount of mutant cameos then Wolverine would've emerged as a much better film. By all means, Sabretooth was a perfectly fine villain and please DO introduce Wade Wilson at the start of the movie (a great set-up for his spin-off). DO NOT however stitch his mouth up and make him the final villain while also including a set of powers the original source material clearly does not feature (so much for the spin-off...) And Gambit?? has there ever been a more needless cameo in the history of comic book movies???

(in reply to Empire Admin)

Post #: 11