captainrentboy
Posts: 678
Joined: 16/3/2008 From: South Wales
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: adambatman82 quote:
ORIGINAL: captainrentboy quote:
ORIGINAL: adambatman82 Why do 90% of the posters in here automatically presume that its going to fail? It's not that I think it'll fail, it's just not one of the announcements made regarding this film have been remotely exciting, in my opinion of course. Therefore at the moment my anticipation for this flick is zero. - Raimi no more, sure the third movie messed things up, but he had a good eye for exciting action sequences and the larger budget led to some fantastic sequences throughout the trilogy. - 80 million budget. (Which is what Empire are reporting, so that's all I can go by for now) Pretty low for what should be a huge picture. - Webb as a director, nothing he's done has thrilled me so far, so why would I be overly positive regarding the fact that he's been given such a huge IP? - Back to high school again for Spidey's origins. Even though we went through all of it, in movie world, less than 10 yrs ago. - One thing we don't need in Spidey films is more angst or teeny drama, (If you add up all the crying and moping about from the first three it's probably 25% of the total running time ) yet this is what Empire believe they're aiming for. Paramount's announcement of more heart, anxiety and teenage recklessness doesn't exactly fill me with hope at getting an action packed comic blockbuster. - James Vanderbilt is writing the story, a quick look on IMDB would reveal that other than Zodiac he hasn't really done much worthwhile. So yeah, should they get the casting spot on or something else positive is announced my hopes for the flick will rise. Until then I've just got to wait and see. So a director who scores a Grammy (and most likely Oscar) nomination for his debut film, a film which is highly lauded by many isn't a good enough reason to give him a shot at something big? Michael Bay has an eye for action, should we give him a shot? The problem with Raimi is that he can't do complex. How many writers produce a screenplay as good as Zodiac in an entire career? Based on that alone, I think we're lucky to have such a writer on board for what many are simply assuming is a hokey-teen flick. Welcome to the Jungle is great too. Lets remember that the script for the first Spider-Man film was written by the luminary that brought us The Lost World, Snake Eyes and went on to write the "script" for the fourth Indy flick. The talent thus far attached to this picture is positive. What's the deal with certain posters on here (Normally the ones with thousands under their belts) thinking their opinion is the be all and end all of opinions, usually stating their beliefs as cast iron FACT. I couldn't give two hoots what nominations (500) Days Of Summer got, the fact that you adored the movie also has no effect on my own opinion. I thought it was of slightly higher quality than the usual romantic tosh that comes out of Hollywood but nothing utterly spectacular. ''Ohh it had a quirky narrative structure and a song and dance number in the middle'' Big deal! Therefore Webb as a director hasn't proven himself to me yet, that's all I'm saying. Just accept that not everyone feels the same about certain movie related matters as you, sure throw your opinion in and then try to move on. Yes Zodiac was good, but let's face it the writer had a wealth of real life material to get his story from and David Fincher directing it, it would've been difficult to screw it up too badly.
|