grant aubin
Posts: 1
Joined: 25/1/2010
|
I just wanted to ask your reviewer what he had been smoking before he saw this awful rom-com. I had a small spliff before I watched, but clearly my stuff wasn't as effective as what Ollie had been smoking. I saw it on Saturday morning, It was ghastly. To call "Did You Hear About the Morgans" mediocre would be a generous compliment . Not only did Hugh Grant - who, despite his utter lack of range I usually rather like - look pretty damn awful, he looked as if he wanted to be somewhere else, and I can''t blame him - but he gave the singularly most monotonous and weak performance of his career. He and a turkey-necked Sarah Jessica Parker have zero chemistry in the picture and looked as if they were being fed their lines on a tele-prompter. Poor SJP shout have castrated the director, the cinematographer and the editor for allowing her to look so unattractive and ugly on the screen. What happened to protecting your leading lady? She must have pissed the producers off something terrible for them not to intervene when they saw the rushes. To say the exhausted, cliched plot is predictable would be the understatement of the century. Every plot point is telegraphed a mile off. This film is a groaner, to put it mildly. The pictures only saving graces are Sam Elliot, Mary Steenburgen and Wilford Brimley, all of whom look sexier and prettier than Hugh and Sarah. To Hugh and Sarah's credit, however, they do look suitably embarrassed most of the way through. "Did Your hear About the Morgans" is one of the weakest, least convincing mainstream comedies I have seen in years. It's sad to think that Hugh and Sarah are either so broke or so greedy that they agreed to apear in this pile of crap. There is, however, some pleasure to be had in watching a film this bad. I suppose you could say it was like watching a glossy, big budget rom-com variation on "Plan 9 from Outer Space". Admittedly the Ed Wood picture was funnier. I can only suspect that your
|