Deviation
Posts: 26923
Joined: 2/6/2006 From: Enemies of Film HQ
|
quote:
see quote:
ORIGINAL: frankie quote:
ORIGINAL: Deviation Passion of the Christ is fucking awful. There is no describing on how fucking awful it is. Really? I think it's brilliant. Definitely the most affecting human version of that story I've ever seen. I can see how it's not everyone's cup of tea, but it's not awful. I'm sure of that. OMG POTC discussion coming NOOOOOOOOO RUN AWAY!!!!! First, because it transforms the Gospels, an entire train of thought and teachings about ethics and morality, into snuff. Secondly, as far as films about the life of Jesus stories this is the worst I've seen, and that counts the singing and dancing anachronistic one. Its impossible to sympathize with a sadomasochistic Christ whose only role in the film is to show how inhumane and vicious the Jews were to him (yes I do have a sympathy with the accusations that this film is anti-Semitic) and annihilating anything that made Christ an important figure in the first place(some unimportant teachings to Gibson's film). The flashback that attempt to bring some humanity involving Christ invents the chair seems to come out of Life and Brian, any powerful emotional moment the film might have (the flashback with a young Jesus falling, which reminded me a lot of Last Temptation and Pasolini's own Gospel of St. Matthews, and made me want to re-watch those, they were actually great) is drowned under unnecessary, OTT, overlong, pointless, repulsive torture that rivals Pasolini's Salo in intensity(and featuring none of its intelligence and motifs). Any sort of spirituality the film might have had Gibson drowns it in gruesome torture. Its what's all wrong in Christianism, here in some two hours, in a focus on violence and the death of Christ rather other more important vital things that make the Gospels or the symbol and life of Christ somewhat important (one of the bits I like is the opening showing spiritual suffering focused on Last Temptation, this is thrown into the drain FOR VIOLENCE). I just found nothing human about it, the lead is has the charisma of a zombie (less if we count the zombies of Romero), everyone and everything else is ignored for the sake of torture. Why care when Gibson simply doesn't care about the rest? It is a hard watch and the film at the end simply conveys nothing, its a crass, simplistic (if not idiotic), pornographic account of the passion without the spirituality featured in Gospel, Last Temptation or even that moment in Andrie Rublev. And worse, its really nothing original, those three films I mentioned before did the same thing with more power and far less violence. Its can be well directed, some 2 or three scenes are nice and it is well scored (and cinematography can be impressive), I repect Gibson for having the guts to do this but it was a somewhat appalling idea in the first place.
_____________________________
quote:
ORIGINAL: Dpp1978 There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement. quote:
ORIGINAL: elab49 I really wish I could go down to see Privates
|