Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

5 Stars? 5 Sodding Stars?!?!?

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> 5 Stars? 5 Sodding Stars?!?!? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
5 Stars? 5 Sodding Stars?!?!? - 21/7/2008 11:14:33 AM   
blaud


Posts: 721
Joined: 13/12/2007
What is wrong with you? the story is all over the place and the overall style screws up the batman legacy

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 91
RE: 5 Stars? 5 Sodding Stars?!?!? - 21/7/2008 1:51:28 PM   
krudler


Posts: 7018
Joined: 30/9/2005
quote:

ORIGINAL: blaud

What is wrong with you? the story is all over the place and the overall style screws up the batman legacy


how? 

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Squidward Hark Bugle

3D moving images are not films, they're holograms, and should be treated as a separate medium of storytelling, or artform.


(in reply to blaud)
Post #: 92
i'm with empire on this ,five stars - 22/7/2008 2:06:59 PM   
indy buff

 

Posts: 8
Joined: 30/5/2008
batman begins is brilliant, its the darkest the franchise has been and bale is awsome ,it dives right in to the dark origin batman was always meant to be depicked as and all those freaks mumbling on about batmans mantra go and watch batman and robin you may feel better watching a film with no rules infact it has no rules ,no talent, no appeal no fuck all except the ability to put a insomniac to sleep case closed

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 93
Watched it again - 23/7/2008 4:15:41 PM   
TheGodfather


Posts: 5327
Joined: 21/10/2005
From: Sin City
Preparing for The Dark Knight, tonight, I`ve watched Batman`s revival again this afternoon.
It still is the best Batman film so far, with a lovely dark atmosphere and Gotham City being portrayed as a totally depraved and corrupted city. Excellent.
Nothing much to comment on in Nolan`s first take at a superheromovie.
But still, this being my 3rd viewing, I think that the combination of a`s Al Guhl, Scarecrow and mob boss Falcone isn`t really working too well and feels kind of forced.
But that doesn`t put this movie down. Once again I`ve enjoyed this marvellous film.
Bring on The Dark Knight

8,0/10

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 94
It can be described in only 3 words. - 25/7/2008 5:36:48 AM   
nc_jj


Posts: 664
Joined: 20/2/2008
Brilliant, perfect, superb.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 95
It can be described in only 3 words. - 25/7/2008 5:36:49 AM   
nc_jj


Posts: 664
Joined: 20/2/2008
Brilliant, perfect, superb.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 96
Batman Begins - 28/8/2008 10:42:54 AM   
Maria Nunes G. P.

 

Posts: 9
Joined: 22/7/2008
The dark knight was first brought to the big screen by director Tim Burton, who created two Batman movies, the first simply called “Batman” in 1989 and the second “Batman Returns” in 1992; after Tim’s versions of the hero came two Joel Schumacher movies which where “Batman Forever” (1995) and “Batman & Robin” (1997). In fact Tim’s movies where good, and Schumacher’s where not that good, well there was nothing that really looked like Batman’s original atmosphere in those movies (apart from a man in a bat suit), but actually none of the four Batman movies done so far left something really remarkable.
Now the dark knight rises again in “Batman Begins”, this time with director Christopher Nolan, and actor Christian Bale playing the masked hero.
Batman Begins is different than the other movies; first of all it’s not just about Batman beating up his enemies, it tries to explain the beginning of everything, how Bruce Wayne turned himself into the masked crime fighter, this movie his more realistic, more intense, it clearly takes a big inspiration on powerful graphic-novels like “The Killing Joke” by Alan Moore and “Arkham Asylum” by Grant Morrison, more than on the comic book series.
It all begins with Bruce Wayne as a child who saw his parents being killed by a criminal called Joe Chill, a sorrow that would grow up with the boy, creating on him a will to punish all criminals. In this movie we can see the never-known-about years in Bruce Wayne’s life where he takes martial art training with master and villain Ra’s Al Ghul, and then his return to a Gotham city, that it’s kind of an anther of crime and social degradation. Of course there are villains in this movie too; they’re Ra’s Al Ghul, mafia’s lord Carmine Falcone and the scarecrow, but the what plot’s real emphasis is Bruce Wayne/Batman character himself; for this movie gives to the multimillionaire and his alter-ego all the intensity he deserves. While the other movies were more superficial and were trying to be a good comic book hero movie, this one is not just a good comic book hero movie, Batman Begins it’s an excellent movie.
Christopher Nolan made (at last!) a real Batman movie, that’s remarkable; it’s kind of a new beginning for Batman’s cinema saga, with a hole new and excellent cast (the perfect Christian Bale, Gary Oldman, Michael Caine…and many other), solid performances supported by a great plot, lots of overpowering gadgets (including the coolest Batmobile ever seen), even the sound track is great… A classic movie.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 97
Empire correcting their own mistakes! Again!! - 10/9/2008 8:43:10 AM   
Bi120

 

Posts: 5
Joined: 18/2/2007
When this review came out back in 2005 I clearly remember Empire giving the film 4 stars. I came home from the cinema picked up my issue to read the review and was really peeved off as I knew it was a 5-star film straight away and this was coming from a film geek not a comic book geek. How dare you Empire, we trust you to judge films the right way, first time round, why should you get a second chance to change your rating, we buy your magazine with confidence that your firm in your reviews. Yes I know its only one-star out but it would have shown real guts as a movie magazine to give a comic book movie (which was an instant classic in my opinion) 5-stars when it actually came out rather than 3 years down the line.

Asad Iqbal, London. 

< Message edited by Bi120 -- 10/9/2008 8:45:13 AM >

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 98
RE: Batman Begins - 15/9/2008 4:19:55 PM   
Dapper Dan Man

 

Posts: 5
Joined: 15/9/2008

After Batman & Robin, George Clooney and co practically killed off the Dark Knight. It is an extremely camp version of batman, totally unbelievable bad guys and why the hell does Batman have his own credit card. I mean WTF. Batman Begins thankfully enough is the total opposite and thank God. Christopher Nolan has managed to transform a hero that had become a laughing stock into a tormented, dark hero that most fans would expect.
 
The plot is very good. Batman has to save Gotham from a toxin that will cause the city’s inhabitants to destroy it through fear. Its very plausible and there is real tension and a question of will he save the day or wont he? Of course he does but the one thing that impressed me more than anything and the reason I wanted to see this film was to see the battle that Bruce Wayne has within himself. He is a man who is lost at the beginning of the film. We see him in a prison, ironically enough for stealing his own goods. As the film progresses so does Bruce, into the Dark Knight himself. This film answers the question why would someone dress up as a bat? The answer: Fear, which is the basis for the whole film. As Bruce says “Bats frighten me. Its time my enemies shared my dread“.
 
Batman films have always had very famous actors and actresses in them. Jack Nicholson, Tommy Lee Jones, George Clooney and Uma Thurman to name but a few. Batman Begins is no different. Morgan Freeman, Liam Neeson, Michael Caine and Cilian Murphy and Katie Holmes. All are fantastic in their supporting roles however the one person who brings Batman Begins together is Christian Bale. He is an amazing Batman, certainly the best. Physically he is up for the part and he also looks like he could run a big business such as Wayne Enterprises. I had seen Christian Bale in a few films before Batman, Little women, American Psycho, Shaft and Equilibrium were all decent in their own way so I was pleased when he was cast. Christian Bale shows off the characters demons, his grievances for his mother and father and makes it believable that running around as a bat is going to frighten people. The bit in the film were he opens up his wardrobe to reveal his helmet is brilliant. Any fan such as myself must have thought “Oh yeah. This is gonna be one hell of a Batman”
And it is.

_____________________________

"Where you gonna put a tree that big?"
"Bend over and Ill show you"

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 99
Batman Begins - 18/12/2008 11:01:21 PM   
jncorbett

 

Posts: 129
Joined: 3/10/2005
Great film, loved it to bits. It's as good as Burton's take on the character, but for different reasons.

Unfortunately, now it's more of a prequel to the stunning The Dark Knight than a film in its own right.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 100
Brilliant Batman - 25/1/2009 11:27:21 AM   
THE DALTONATOR

 

Posts: 80
Joined: 17/2/2008
need i say more? every thing about this film is great and if i get started i want stop its the second best superhero film ever made with the best superhero film being....the dark knight. Nolan has taken batman to the top of the superhero food chain and erased the memory of the utterly dreaful batman forever and batman and robin nolans two films even put burtons to shame.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 101
- 5/2/2009 4:59:24 AM   
WiseGuy101

 

Posts: 57
Joined: 4/2/2009
A GREAT FILM. HEAPS BETTER THAN THE DARK KNIGHT. IF BALE COULD PULL OFF A WALL STREET SERIAL KILLER, I KNEW HE COULD PULL OF A SUPERHERO.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 102
Batman at his Best - 19/3/2009 4:59:54 PM   
DAMO 89

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 19/3/2009
The dark knight returns to his brilliant brooding best after the disaster that was Batman and Robin. Christian Bale is a magnificent Batman/ Bruce Wayne creating depth to both sides of his persona. Nolan's realistic approach to Batman is groundbreaking and brings the gritty, dark influence of Frank Miller's Year one to create a film that is an explosive adreneline filled adventure. The Hans Zimmer soundtrack helps to emphasize the dark tone that is expected of a Batman film. Batman has been brought back to his roots and with excellent results. Batman at his best!

< Message edited by DAMO 89 -- 19/3/2009 5:07:51 PM >

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 103
Where do I 'Begin'? - 23/4/2009 11:45:15 AM   
Shaunyboy27


Posts: 27
Joined: 22/4/2009
From: Aberdeen, Scotland
Christian Bale becomes the most believable Batman to date and Nolan sets the bar for all comic book adaptations with Begins. This is a great origin story with Nolan and Bale creating a tormented, broody bat and yet again a belivable Gotham. Burton and Schumacher’s ignorance have been put to shame by Nolan. Unlike previous Batman films Begins stays true to the comics and Nolan impressively makes the most mature and fresh comic book adaptaions to date. . . Apart from the sequel obviously!

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 104
- 14/6/2009 3:54:11 PM   
PureAinmhi


Posts: 94
Joined: 16/11/2008
From: Ireland
Having seen Batman and Robin I felt that there was no hope for the Batman franchise but here we are!!!! I've never left a cinema so unbelievably satisfied. This is taking Batman back to its dark roots!! Brilliant piece of film and the start of a new generation for Batman.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 105
Great - 13/3/2010 4:52:18 PM   
shady_88

 

Posts: 46
Joined: 18/4/2009
One of the best movie of the decade

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 106
A sense of the theatrical... - 9/5/2010 4:13:42 PM   
neopol


Posts: 126
Joined: 9/11/2006
From: Manchester, Egland
Batman has always seemed to make great viewing and with the darker takes on him of the past to decades, great movies.

This was a real treat though. It's almost rational take on an irrational super hero. Many of his trates had become figures of fun and jokes, but this movie successfully explains away the fact that he can keep this double a life a secret and that he's up all night and nobody seems to care!

Chris Nolan has managed to give Batman a human face and the world he inhabits a sense of scale and realism. But that's not to say though that it lacks a sense of the theatrical...

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 107
- 7/7/2010 9:09:37 AM   
mbembet

 

Posts: 10
Joined: 9/12/2008
definitely one of the Greatest movie ever made

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 108
Batman is Darker and Better than Ever Before - 8/7/2010 3:08:56 PM   
COLO


Posts: 17
Joined: 7/5/2010
From: Cork
To be honest, I never really liked the old Batman movies to begin with. And I think we can all agree that the series went downhill rapidly (Batman and Robin ring any bells?). So you can understand why I would have my doubts about this attempt to reboot the Caped Crusader.

And yet, Batman Begins comes through on all fronts, with a much better explanation of Batman's back story than anything the comics and Tim Burton have ever managed. And featuring two of Batman's less commonly known baddies (Ra's Al Ghul and Scarecrow), it doesn't immediately dive in with the big boys like Joker of the Riddler. Indeed, this movie takes its time with everything, with Batman only putting on the mask for the first time about an hour into it.

This proves to be a wise choice, as it allows the writers to explore the character beneath the mask. And who better to play this new, more tormented Batman then Christian Bale.

The supporting talent isn't too shabby either. Michael Caine has the perfect butler/loyal accomplice stance as Alfred, Gary Oldman is an unlikely but excellent addition as Commissioner Gordon (still only Sgt in this movie), while Liam Neeson and Cillian Murphy (both Irish) strut their stuff as the two villains mentioned above.

Overall then, Batman Begins brings our hero back to life in this much darker, much grittier and much better manner than any superhero movie has managed before

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 109
- 4/11/2010 5:31:06 PM   
reminn

 

Posts: 142
Joined: 22/10/2010
Classic.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 110
Batman Returns - 3/6/2011 9:59:54 AM   
neopol


Posts: 126
Joined: 9/11/2006
From: Manchester, Egland
Batman has always seemed to make great viewing and with the darker takes on him of the past to decades, great movies. This was a real treat though. It’s almost a rational take on an irrational super hero. Christopher Nolan has managed to give Batman a human face and the world he inhabits a sense of scale and realism. But that’s not to say that it is lacking in the sense of the theatrical.

Back in 2005, the hype for this film was building, with a new take on the old comic hero taking shape. Though I must admit that the design of the new Batmobile didn’t look cool to me, but I loved the concept of rooting him in a real world. The other questionable point was that lack of the big hitters in terms of the villains. The Joker, Penguin, Riddler and Catwomen were dumped in favour of The Scarecrow and Ra’s al Ghul, with only one that I, as the un-indoctrinated in comic book lore, that I had heard of being The Scarecrow.

But this was not to be a typical Batman film in any sense of the word. In June 2005, Batman was reborn and not only had the career of an independently styled filmmaker, Christopher Nolan blown into the big leagues but Blockbusters had just been redefined, an event not dis-similar in effect t those of Jaws and Star Wars in the 1970′s.

Batman, a Warner Bros. cash cow for decades, was about to cross all the main lines within the industry and a blockbuster with art house sensibilities and real intelligence was about to born. It’s not the first, but it opened the door for Nolan and his like to change the way we think about movies of this kind. It doesn’t seem to be that long ago that Marvel was dominating cinemas was some first-rate adaptations such as X-Men, Spider-man and the underrated Hulk, which in many ways may be classed as a prototype for this, with art house direction from Ang Lee.

The plot of Batman Begins isn’t really that important though that’s not to sell it short. It’s a highly

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 111
Odd plothole - 26/8/2011 12:17:05 AM   
pleakhouse

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 3/1/2008
I can't believe I just noticed this.
Ok so this toxin has to be inhaled through the lungs, not drunk or eaten.
It's been in the water-mains for weeks, and in all that time not one citizen of Gotham, boiled a kettle?
No cups of tea, coffee, hot water bottles, porridge?
This is still one of my favourite films but this is a huge oversight.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 112
Batman Begins Review - 13/12/2011 11:41:31 PM   
the film man

 

Posts: 605
Joined: 13/10/2010
Brooding and dark, but also exciting and smart, Batman Begins is a film that understands the essence of one of the definitive superheroes.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 113
Very good start to the movie trilogy. - 24/1/2012 2:50:00 PM   
asda24995

 

Posts: 5
Joined: 2/3/2009
From: Birmingham
It was a generally good movie, I really liked it a lot. But I didn't personally like Ras al Ghul. But overall strong.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 114
- 12/5/2012 11:40:16 AM   
YouWillBeUnprepared

 

Posts: 62
Joined: 20/2/2012
The film rushed its beginning which to me was important to show how he got to be where we've never seen before. The beginning was also abit cheesy, and that to me (giving that I saw the dark knight first) isn't very Nolan. But never the less, was enjoyable and I ADORED watching batman, and the larger than life, full-of-depth Bruce wayne.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 115
Fear - 15/5/2012 9:10:44 PM   
MovieFanatic9

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 15/5/2012
Goes deep into Batman's origin, which is what us fans need. It goes really deep in fear, which is the films theme. It is very well done, the acting is top notch. Bale gives Bruce Wayne/Batman the heart the character has been missing. Simply a masterpeice.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 116
- 10/6/2012 4:10:04 AM   
Gears of Kong

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 16/5/2012
Bale, Caine, Neeson, Freeman, Murphy, Oldman and Wilkinson are all superb in this film, the villains truly are fantastic, a brilliant twist in the third act and by the way in Dark Knight Maggie Gyllenhall is so much better than Katie Holmes.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 117
- 24/7/2012 6:05:11 PM   
TheGodfather


Posts: 5327
Joined: 21/10/2005
From: Sin City
In preparation of watching The Dark Knight Rises in just over on hour ( :happy: 8) 8) ), today I watched:

Batman Begins
Christopher Nolan`s reboot of the Batman franchise is probably the best origin story ever, my appreciation of this film grows with every viewing.
Everything is right, from the thundering musical score and the story to the story and the wonderful dark atmosphere, from Christian Bale who gives us a great Batman to the excellent direction by Nolan.
Fantastic

8,5/10

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 118
RE: Batman Begins - 20/8/2012 5:01:18 PM   
chris kilby

 

Posts: 1264
Joined: 31/3/2010
I'm even later to this party than I was to The Dark Knight Rises, but what the hey...

Where does he get those wonderful toys? It’s a question which clearly has bugged Christopher Nolan for years. Well now we know – he gets them off that guy in The Shawshank Redemption who can get you anything. Even a Batmobile!

A straight origin story (albeit one told in the anything-but-straight, disjointed narrative style of Jean-Luc Godard or Nic Roeg which only settles down into something more linear and conventional once Citizen Wayne arrives back in Gotham City), Batman Begins is the first Batman film actually about Batman. An idea so obvious it’s a wonder no-one thought of it before.

Actually, someone did. Batman Begins owes a lot to Richard Donner’s Superman – the episodic structure, the stylistic shifts determined by location, the all-star cast - even if, tonally, it is its exact opposite. Which is ironic since Tim Burton’s Batman only got made because screenwriter Sam Hamm deliberately avoided using the Superman template which had mired that version of The Dark Knight in development hell for over a decade. Hamm wanted to avoid lengthy training montages of Bruce Wayne doing push-ups. Yet here we are, twenty years later, with a Batman movie which is basically a two-hour training montage. But what a training montage!

The Batman’s been a lot of things over the years. He’s been camp. He’s been dark. He’s been camp again. He’s even been shite. But he’d never been real before. Well, real-ish. Where Tim Burton gave us the hyper-stylised, mock-Goth fantasy version, Christopher Nolan has opted for verisimilitude - the appearance of a plausible pseudo-reality which is more French Connection than camp desecration.

Nolan carefully builds his Batman from the ground up, rationalising everything as he goes – why a mask, why a bat, and, yes, where he gets those wonderful toys. (In a nice touch, Bruce Wayne has to order thousands of the components which make up the cowl just to avoid raising suspicion.) But he introduces the iconography gradually, perfectly timing the debuts of The Cave, The Suit, The Wheels and what will become The Signal for maximum dramatic impact like the master showman he is.

The Batmobile’s real introduction is the standout setpiece of the entire movie – here, a black… tank accompanied through the streets (and over the rooftops!) of Gotham by Hans Zimmer’s iconic score from Black Rain. Well, if you’re gonna steal, you’re as well stealing from yourself. And it’s still a great piece of music.

Then there are the fanpleasingly iconic shots of the cape billowing in the wind and a stunning money shot of The Batman perched atop the spire of a vertigo-inducingly tall building like a gargoyle which elicited gasps in the cinema. For this Batman is self-consciously self-mythologising; very deliberately turning himself into a symbol. An icon. A legend.

What, in anyone else’s hands, would be a pointlessly reductive and mind-numbingly tedious exercise which just got in the way of the story, in Nolan’s hands becomes the meat of the movie itself and something very special indeed.

But Nolan’s in no rush. (Not until The Batman enters Arkham Asylum, certainly, and the film simply does not let up until its thrillingly visceral roller-coaster climax.) It’s easily an hour before we see Wayne in the batsuit. One of the triumphs of Batman Begins is we don’t care. This Bruce Wayne is an interesting character in his own right – a trick Iron Man was to repeat a few years later, testament to just how influential Nolan’s approach to this sort of material has been. For the first time ever on-screen, The Batman isn’t overshadowed by scenery-chewing, OTT bad guys.

It’s about time too. Few characters are as endlessly fascinating or psychologically complex as The Dark Knight Detective. There are hints early on here that young Bruce Wayne is in danger of going down the Travis Bickle/Bernie Goetz road to self-destruction before he is saved from himself by, er, a fanatical cult of vigilante ninjas. Did someone say “realism…”?

Batman Begins is a perfect match of director and material. Christopher Nolan’s films are all about identity – Following, Memento, Insomnia and subsequently The Prestige and Inception. But he can talk about “realism” all he likes. Batman Begins still demands a tremendously willing suspension of disbelief from the audience – we are still talking about a guy who dresses up like a bat, after all. But then, what film doesn’t…?

So why a mask? And why a bat? Fear is the key. In a neat twist, this Batman turns his own Indiana Jones-like childhood phobia of bats against his enemies. Fear is a weapon and a major theme of this movie and of the post-9/11 era it reflects. 9/11 casts a very long shadow over Batman Begins – a bin Laden-like villain, the al Qaeda-like League of Shadows (SPECTRE reconfigured for the modern world as a fanatical cult), and an evil plot (to literally spread fear) which is 9/11 2.0 in all but name. Early drafts of the script were even subtitled: “Intimidation Game” which sounds like an alt. gameshow from hell. All fright my loves…?

Although Mind Games would be more like it. Nolan knows a thing or two about “theatricality and deception” himself and does like playing games, not least with the audience’s heads. A late-in-the-day reveal comes as a real surprise yet is so obvious if you’re a comics fan (and even if you’re not, probably) that I’m still annoyed I didn’t see it coming. Talk about hidden in plain sight. Why, Nolan – I oughtta…! (He’s also a master at disguising exposition as dynamic action – that sword fight on the ominously cracking ice of a frozen lake.)

Something else Nolan does is turn apparently inherent problems with the super-hero film genre itself on their heads. Multiple villains have long been the, uh, bane of super-hero movies. Super-sequels especially – the dreaded “Too-Many-Crooks” Syndrome! Yet Batman Begins has four of them, starting with a mugger and gradually working its way along the criminal chain to a gangster, a super-villain and finally a charismatic global super-terrorist – THE cinematic uber-villain of the early 21st Century having finally usurped the Hannibal Lecter-style serial killer from his throne. Clearly, it’s not the size of your rogues gallery, it’s what you do with it that counts.

Ra’s al Ghul was an inspired if not immediately obvious choice of villain. Not widely known outside the comics-reading ghetto, crucially, he carried no baggage from previous films as most moviegoers had never heard of him. Ra’s is more Bond villain than super-villain - “Gentlemen. The time has come to spread the word. And the word is… panic”; “Now if you’ll excuse me I have a city to destroy.” Originally conceived in the early seventies as a more realistic, Moriarty-like figure in a successful attempt to rescue Batman from the camp excesses of the sixties TV show (the phenomenal if short-lived success of which almost destroyed the character), Ra’s helped turn The Caped Crusader into The Dark Knight. So it’s apt, having once saved his surrogate son from the shadow of Adam West that Ra’s should return to rescue him again, this time from the ignominious clutches of the dreaded Schumacher!

Indeed, Bond has been a large and growing influence on Nolan’s blockbuster career. Inception was a virtual love letter to OHMSS and if Spot-The-Bond Reference in The Dark Knight Rises was a drinking game, Withnail & I would both urgently require liver transplants! While this influence is less overt in Batman Begins it is there. In the exotic globe-trotting. In the villain’s grandiose plotting and private army. And in the figure of Morgan Freeman’s Lucius Fox – Batman’s “Q” in all but name.

But the biggest influence on Batman Begins by far is the seminal graphic novel, Batman: Year One. There is a lot of Frank Miller’s noir masterpiece in there - Flass, Loeb, Jim Gordon’s portrayal as a born again badass, an iconic set-piece involving bats and the pieta-like tableau of the young Bruce and his murdered parents. But, crucially, there’s a lot that isn’t. Nolan is true to the spirit of Frank Miller without being slavishly devoted to the point of the over-awed adoration which made Watchmen such a sclerotic cinematic experience. And, crucially, Miller isn’t Nolan’s sole inspiration. Ra’s al Ghul was a Denny O’Neil creation and “Henri Ducard” is a nice acknowledgement of Batman screenwriter, Sam Hamm, who created the name (if not the character) for the Detective Comics 50th Anniversary issue back in 1989 – the year of Batman’s release.

Something else Batman Begins shares with Superman is its large, all-star cast. Rutger Hauer is an obvious tribute to Nolan’s favourite movie, Blade Runner. Every shot of the incongruously shanty town-like “Narrows” cries out “Blade Runner!” too. Especially when it’s raining. (Or “shonky town” judging by some of the model work…) And further down the ranks are some great character actors like the always sweatily-reliable Mark Boone Jnr. And who knew that Batman was Ken Barlow’s grandson…?

Katie Holmes (as new addition and love interest, Rachel Dawes) came in for a lot of predictable stick as the cast’s supposedly weak link. But she’s OK in the token underwritten-female role – a recurring feature of Nolan’s boys’ films and his Achilles heel as a writer. Even if, inevitably, she’s a little on the young side to be a high-flying assistant DA. (cf: Superman Returns’ supposedly hard-bitten Lois Lane who must have been all of twelve when The Man of Steel went on sabbatical for ten years.)

Tom Wilkinson, of all people, is something of a revelation as a snarling gangster. So often typecast as emasculated husbands and downtrodden, middle-aged angst personified, this must’ve been a dream come true.

Cillian Murphy is icily creepy as a corrupt psychiatrist with secrets of his own and unexpected links to The Batman’s past – compensation for being the reputed runner-up in the race to fill the cape, presumably. And being a psychiatrist in this context, inevitably there is talk of “Jungian archetypes.” Jung and Dangerous? Or The Jung Poisoner’s Handbook…?

Liam Neeson is taking on almost Mount Rushmore levels of monumental gravitas these days. Like Charlton Heston with acting chops. Or a small planet with a beard.

It goes without saying that Gary Oldman is great as Frank Miller’s bold reinterpretation of Sgt Jim Gordon (still years away from that promotion to Commissioner) as the one clean cop in a city that likes being dirty. It’s nice to see Oldman hold the ham and play a recognisable human being for a change after one or six OTT bad guys too many in recent decades. Too bad he looks like Ned Flanders, though - okily-dokily!

Nolan’s Dark Knight Trilogy takes itself very seriously indeed (and, following Schumacher’s camp-astrophic Bat-rocity, it was about time too!) but it’s nowhere near as humourless as some critics bafflingly insist. The wonderfully wry and insouciant Morgan Freeman as the sardonic Lucius Fox is drier than one of James Bond’s Martinis: “Expecting to run into much gunfire in these caves?” and “I don’t think they ever tried to market it to the billionaire, spelunking, base-jumping crowd.”

But If Lucius Fox is “Q” to Batman’s 007, then Michael Caine’s Alfred is both The Dark Knight’s acerbic conscience and the Trilogy’s light relief - “What’s the point of all those push-ups if you can’t even lift a bloody log?” So what exactly does Bruce Wayne do with all his time and money? It’s a nice, ironic touch that while one surrogate father teaches Bruce to be Batman, it is Alfred who teaches Batman to be Bruce - driving sports cars, dating film stars, buying things which aren’t for sale - more shades of Citizen Kane - in the forlorn hope that if his master starts pretending to have fun he might have some real fun by accident. Which of course raises the crucial question: which is the mask? The Batman or Bruce Wayne? And speaking of The Batman’s surrogate father (and themes of identity and duality), when Gordon says he’ll get his car, that IS Liam Neeson’s voice growling “I’ve brought MINE!” Isn’t it…?

Marking a return to Alfred Pennyworth’s comic book origins as a tough, no-nonsense, John Bull-like cockney, well, who else were they gonna call? Caine’s deadpan delivery of (the ad-libbed?) “May I suggest you try to avoid landing on your ‘ead” has the usually taciturn Christian Bale visibly cracking up in the background!

And Batman Begins is Bale’s show all the way. Rumour has it the studio was reluctant to cast Bale after a string of flops and Nolan had to really fight to get him. But thank god he did or we might have been lumbered with the likes of Freddie Prinze Jnr! Nolan was right and Bale has more than earned his cowl. His alarming weight loss (for The Machinist) followed by his even more alarming weight (and muscle) gain for this reminding everyone that this Batman is being played by no less than another DeNiro. For Bale is without doubt the finest actor to don the cape yet. We’ve come a long way from Adam West – Holy Oscars, Batman! (Dang. Sorry. Swore I wouldn’t do that.)

Bale said he became “a beast” in the suit and it shows. His Batman is a truly terrifying, almost primal figure, roaring at a quaking Mark Boone Jnr like a wild animal – Jung, free and single-minded, you could say. Bale’s Batman is as brutally efficient as his fighting style which has come in for a lot of stick from people just looking for things to complain about. True, sometimes it is hard to tell what’s going on in the impressionistic fight scenes. But that too is attributable to Nolan’s “realistic” agenda. Real fights aren’t anything like the glamourised Hollywood version we’re so accustomed to.

There is real pain etched on Bale’s face when Bruce has to act the drunken arse to save the lives of his guests. It’s interesting, though, when Bruce sneers at the conspicuous charity of his fellow rich “philanthropists” in The Dark Knight Rises it suggests what he said to them here maybe wasn’t that far from the truth after all. But Bale gets some deadpan laughs too – “Does it come in black?” “Anyone who dresses up as a bat clearly has issues.” And “You know how it is. You’re out at night. Lookin’ for kicks. Someone’s passing ‘round the weaponised hallucinogens…”

But no film is perfect. (You don’t say!) There are plot holes - How does Alfred get The Batman down off that roof? Wouldn’t a giant microwave, well, cook everyone anywhere near it? But I don’t see them ever being an issue with anyone…

The League of Shadows only really exists to make Batman’s undeniably extreme (and illegal) methods seem almost reasonable by comparison. The same way Bat-flicks always feel the need to conjure up “non-canonical” female love interests just so no-one thinks our rubber-fetishising hero is gay or anything. Dr Frederick Wertham still casts a long shadow too, it seems…

Nolan’s foreshadowing isn’t exactly what you’d call subtle either. “It’s not who you are underneath. It’s what you do that defines you.” Nolan does this a lot. (“Why do we fall…?” “You still haven’t given up on me?”) And while it is a bit obvious and on the nose, the dramatic payoff is still undeniably powerful – my favourite bit actually. A real hair-on-the-back-of-the-neck moment.

And this is strong stuff for a 12A certificate – one character’s fear-induced hallucinations (especially how he sees The Batman!) being literally the stuff of nightmares. Then there are the escaped serial killers lurching out of a literal fog of fear like zombies… (I’ve always said Tim Booth out of James has the eyes of a killer!)

But if there’s a legitimate criticism of Batman Begins, it’s the more set-bound comic book fantasy elements do sometimes sit awkwardly with the location-shot realism. Something which presumably struck Nolan himself hence the almost entirely location-shot (and even more “realistic”) The Dark Knight. Looking back on Batman Begins with the benefit of hindsight, visually, it almost looks like a transitional film, halfway between the set-bound, impressionistic Gothic fantasy of Tim Burton and the Michael Mann hyper-realism of what was to come.

Nolan is famously averse to CGI (and, it turns out, 3D) only using it when absolutely necessary and then sparingly. He doesn’t over-rely on it, using it to augment what is already there, not to dazzle the eye. And it is seamless. Batman Begins is one of the best “invisible” effects movies since Citizen Kane – another classic where the audience isn’t even aware they are watching special effects. The bats, for instance, have to be CG – there’s simply no other way they could have been achieved what with insurance cover for rabies being through the roof at the moment! But they don’t look it.

Which highlights another great thing about Batman Begins and Christopher Nolan’s "keepin' it real" filmmaking philosophy. It’s nice to see actual sets for a change. It feels like ages since I saw them last in a summer blockbuster. You don’t need CG to achieve this kind of epic scope, epic scale and epic sweep. You just need some stunning locations – Iceland doubling for China. A majestic score by Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard doesn’t hurt either.

Batman Begins ends with an ominous warning about the dangerous escalation represented by The Batman’s theatrics and a teasing hint at a possible sequel which could just be another nod to Batman: Year One. There’s also a recurring, blond-haired, Anime-eyed moppet, who remains intriguingly nameless, and could yet prove to be of future significance to the franchise. [Or not.]

So was Batman Begins The Most Successful Reboot Ever? It certainly proved influential, arguably inspiring the glut of similar reboots which followed, starting with Casino Royale. Which is kinda ironic when you consider the enduring influence Bond has had on The Dark Knight Trilogy

Batman Begins was frankly a revelation (in every sense) after the gaudy, neon-lit car crash that was Batman on Broadway aka: Batman & Robin - the fanboys gave a name to their pain… And it was Schumacher! And, yes, for this fanboy, Batman Begins was almost a religious experience with all the awe and wonder that implies. I could have wept with joy it was so good. Almost too good to be true, in fact. Cos you really get the feeling watching this for the first time that finally, after all these years, someone had done Batman properly. Batman Begins was the film I’d wanted Burton’s Batman to be all those years ago.

Mark Kermode is right – and it’s not often I say that. Nolan is an arthouse director trapped in the body a blockbuster director. The Anti-Bay. The Anti-Schumacher! And not a Bat-nip or Bat-butt in sight - where does he get these wonderful films?

(It’s still a rotten title, though. Batman: Origins or Genesis of The Batman would have been better. How about The Batman Menace? No, I've got it… Batman Royale!)

< Message edited by chris kilby -- 20/8/2012 5:54:45 PM >

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 119
RE: Batman Begins - 20/8/2012 5:16:12 PM   
homersimpson_esq


Posts: 20118
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Springfield
tl;dr

_____________________________

That deep-browed Homer ruled as his demesne.


Bristol Bad Film Club
A place where movie fans can come and behold some of the most awful films ever put to celluloid.

(in reply to chris kilby)
Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> 5 Stars? 5 Sodding Stars?!?!? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.156