Deviation
Posts: 26905
Joined: 2/6/2006 From: Enemies of Film HQ
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Pigeon Army quote:
ORIGINAL: Deviation quote:
ORIGINAL: Woger quote:
ORIGINAL: Deviation From this one minute I have seen I will say that even The Cell got the concept better. That film was based in the realm of the mind and dreams and certainly got the dreamscapes right. And so did Paprika. Honestly, why Nolan for this? But The Cell was a bit too "ooh look at the weird stuff" for me, isn't Paprika animated? It may be able to get away with things live action can't. Anyway, it's wait and see for me but I'm confident it'll be worth catching. It is dreams, it is subjective, of course it is weird, it is fantasy, surreal, bizarre. Maybe not in the level of The Cell, Vertigo or Spellbound but please don't make a 200 million sci-fi about dreams and make them straightfoward and realistic. At least in Open your Eyes and Buneal's films you had some imagery. Some symbolism. I have still not seen that in Nolan, not once (except possibly in Insomnia, possibly). And Paprika is animated but it did have some stunning imagery and visuals. Mind you this is a one minute teaser I am talking about. So it could still surprise me. Like The Dark Knight did. Paprika is animated but still had a similar plot. EDIT: I just remembered Doodlebug, sorry, move along. Keep the bold in mind, Devi, and everyone else going crazy on either side. The amount of hyperbole slinging both ways is ridiculous (though declaring The Cell and Paprika to have better imagery than the entirety of this film based on two scenes in a teaser trailer is plumbing lows usually reserved for a certain someone in the Unpopular Opinion thread ). It's intriguing - it's not an amazing teaser (I was expecting a bit more from the hallway fight based on what I'd been told) but it does appear to be going for a more reality-based dreamscape, and that's fine. Dreams aren't all unicorns and screaming trees, so I don't see why we need to expect full-on fantasy from a dream-based film - though I don't necessarily think Nolan won't engage in the fantastical in the film (as you said, Devi, Doodlebug seems to point at a side of Nolan he's not yet explored). I was somewhat basing it as well on what I had seen previously from Nolan, forgetting Doodlebug. And his Batman films. But yeah, I did fall on those levels. I was being silly there, see unlike you I can accept when I am being nonsensical. I am not expecting full on fantasy (Amenabar, Bunuel, Holland did some impressive work without going full on fantasy). It's just these Batman films that piss me off a bit. Well, one Batman film. Plus I did say I was being silly, like you were being silly about the characterization in Pierrot le Fou and Alien. Oh sick Burn!!!!111!!!!
_____________________________
quote:
ORIGINAL: Dpp1978 There are certainly times where calling a person a cunt is not only reasonable, it is a gross understatement. quote:
ORIGINAL: elab49 I really wish I could go down to see Privates
|