darcaine
Posts: 9
Joined: 13/8/2009
|
Ooops, I don't know what I was thinking about 15 years between the two versions. Anyway, yeah, the ratings were really that bad. 2 million viewers, even by cable standards is low. US tv networks are greedy and when they have a successful show on their hands, they do everything they can to keep it on the air as long as possible. SG-1 running for 10 years is a good example of that. BSG still had life left in it, they killed it early because a 2 million ratings share is tiny, even for Syfy. Does Universal consider it a success? Hard to say (I'd wager that if they did, they wouldn't be rushing a BSG movie out though). They ponied up the cash in the hopes of ratings increasing, and after 4 years and 2 movies proved that they weren't going to...the axe fell. It's not really that uncommon for networks to give a show they really believe in, love and that is getting tons of critical acclaim to stay on the air for a few years even though it's ratings are crap. (Alias on ABC had terrible ratings, but it stayed on the air for multiple seasons because it brought ABC critical acclaim at a time they really needed it). Does Universal believe that the franchise can be massively more successful than the remake was on Syfy? My bet is yes they do. Just look at the fandom that surrounded the original, verses the remake (If I remember right, someone even killed themselves over the cancellation). The fan furor over it's cancellation was so massive that the network brought it back a year later as the crappy Galactica 80. That hardly ever happens on network TV in the US, and certainly wouldn't have happened for the remake. And no, I don't believe he would do that, I believe that if he continued the 1970s storyline like he had planned to back in 2000, that Adama would be dead, and Appollo would be turned into the leader of the Cylons.
< Message edited by darcaine -- 14/8/2009 6:42:02 PM >
|