kenada_woo
Posts: 1669
Joined: 30/9/2005
|
quote:
Why not Fillion? quote:
ORIGINAL: hughjass To all those folks who say 'Why Nathan Fillion?' whenever his name is suggested, it's becasue the guy has leading man potential and doesn't get chance to show it. He may play extensions of himself on occassions but he has more charisma and charm that half the leading men in Hollywood. Having met him a few times, I can totally understand why the fangirls go wibbly for him. He is another actor like Bruce Campbell who may not have the sucessful leading man career that he should have done. For me, Fillion is ideal for a film like Drake's Fortune, because he can play that kind of role very well. To me, he and Reynolds are similar kinds of actor - they can both play the wicked glint in his eyes kind of roles. To those critics of Fillion, I offer the counter question of 'Why not Fillion?' There are plenty of far worse actors out there - I'd take him as a lead over the likes of Orblando Looms any day of the week. Erm...he looks fat but he's not...and he's not been in a big film. Both Cooper and Renyolds are better looking..and better actors haha. Its more of a case of... "Nathan who?" "Guy out of Serenity..." "Serena-what?" "Firefly film" "eh?" "He was in White Noise 2?" "White Noise 2? That was shit!" "Bradley Cooper?" "Was in the Hangpover" "Quality film that!" "Ryan Renyolds?" "Van Wilder?" "Yep!" "He's funny! Smoking Aces was good. Blade 2 was gash though..but he was good in it" "Timberlake?" "Who doesnt like Timerblake? Nobody!"
_____________________________
http://dereksdontrunfilms.blogspot.co.uk/ "You bailed out a Jamaican street named Monkey the other day, I want him. This other piece of shit, Screwface, I want him. I know you're a scumbag and a puke, I don't mind that, but give me what I need and I'll leave here a nice guy. If you don't, I'm gonna fuck you up. " Hatcher. Marked For Death
|