boot
Posts: 431
Joined: 24/2/2006
|
On the whole I found this dissapointing. It's not a patch on Borat and the main reason for this - before getting into what was/wasn't staged or how a lot of the scenes are quite short because they just weren't working that well - is that Bruno, for me, just isn't that funny a character. In the original tv show the small clips worked pretty well just lampooning the fashion world, but moving outside of that I don't think he works. He's pretty much completely unlikeable whereas Borat was always somewhat loveable irregardless of his racist and luddite ways. There was a few parts that were very funny but too often I was distracted by how staged so much of it seemed. Like the bondage scene in the hotel, far too many cameras shooting. What perplexes me sometimes about choices like that is: if you have set the scene up at least make it look like it isn't set up. Don't have camera's shooting the staff before they enter the room! That's just poor film making imo. This sort of thing distracted me too many times and took me out of the world of the film and thus I couldn't find a lot of it funny. I couldn't help but notice that many of the scenes were very short. Maybe I'm mistaken but I don't remember such frantic editing in Borat or the feeling that they desperately scuttled together just enough to make a feature length, which is how I found Bruno. I got the feeling that many of the scenarios just weren't that succesful, or as much as they'd have hoped. Like the scene where he sang the song with the Palasintinian and Israeli. It just wasn't funny, they barely reacted to him and it went on too long, without actually being lengthy.. I actually found the whole film dragged, yet it's barely over 70mins. Cohen can be an hilarious comedian, but this was a very big let down for me. 1.5/5
|