yiarkungfu
Posts: 15
Joined: 14/7/2008
|
Hes still got edge, his films are still cool, and I like everything he has done apart from when he decides to act. Res Dogs was a great film - a real gem, probably not one you can watch more than once and get the same impact you had first time round. Pulp Fiction is his best in my opinion. When I saw it at the cinema i would have been around 18 and it just blew me away, this was a cool film in many ways, it really felt fresh and exciting to me. Great cast, great script, loved the way the film was not chronological. I walked out of the cinema and i wanted to walk right back in and watch it again. Its hard for a director who had such a profound influence on popular culture to follow up a movie like that, whatever he decided to make he was going to take some flak for. But lets be honest the guy follows his gut and makes movies he wants to make, in his own unique style. Sure some arent as good as others - but no director can make every film a masterpiece, they are always flawed in one way or another, and you cant please everyone. I still look forward to every film he makes because hes a gifted film-maker, and perhaps grindhouse didnt work out as well as it could have, but I actually enjoyed it for what it was. I wasnt expecting another Resevoir Dogs or Pulp Fiction. You never really know how good a film will be untill you go watch it, so to write him off because he hasnt made something good since Pulp Fiction etc is a mistake, directors have to challenge themselves, and sometimes these films dont work as well as they wanted them to. Its far better a film-maker has the nerve to try something left of field and fail than to play it safe. Im looking forward to Inglorious bastards anyway. Its hard to think of a director that has never made an average or terrible movie come to think of it.
|