adambatman82
Posts: 11156
Joined: 15/12/2005 From: Sheffield
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hughezy quote:
ORIGINAL: adambatman82 quote:
ORIGINAL: Hughezy seriously, i DARE an awards commity to get some balls how so? by giving an unworthy winner the top prize? bloody dark knight fans, theyre the new daily mail readers... i couldn't give 2 shits about Dark Knight, i just can't stand how it's always the same fucking films that get nominated. it's so boring. but surely the same films are nominated and win simply because they are the best in their field? slumdog millionaire is a great film, not my favourite of the bunch but i recognise its quality. sean penn is fantastic in milk, i defy anyone to sit through that film and come out thinking anything less. wall-e was the best animated film of last year, period. kate winslett won the award that i would say was right for her role in the reader; screentime aside i genuinely felt that hers was a suppporting character, lending the weight that ralph fiennes' character worked off of. any award show that gives mad men recognition deserves at least some respect. and while i havent yet seen man on wire or doubt i am looking forward to both rather a lot, with the accompanying press recognition suggesting that both are deserved winners. i would say that the only films that i felt genuinely deserve more recognition are the wrestler and changeling, alas i cant always have it the way i want it. out of interest, how would you rather have seen it? who would have been nominated?
|