adambatman82
Posts: 11156
Joined: 15/12/2005 From: Sheffield
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: great_badir quote:
ORIGINAL: adambatman82 From what I can see there is nothing in the core ingredients of Bond that would prevent race (or even gender) subversion. Except for the fact that Ian Fleming wrote (and drew) Bond as an upper class white English ex-public school boy, in the same way that Ernest Tidyman wrote John Shaft as an African-American from the streets... But upper class black English ex-public school boys *do* exist. I don't understand why it's so alien a concept. The cultural things could all theoretically stay the same, the only thing that changes would be the colour of his skin. quote:
ORIGINAL: great_badir Ignoring Shaft's unique cultural birth (which, granted, does not exist with Bond), any deviation from an upper class approaching-middle-age white English male would not be James Bond. But why ignore Shaft's cultural birth? That's precisely what defines that specific character. The same categorically cannot be said of Bond.
|