jobloffski
Posts: 1837
Joined: 30/9/2005 From: elsewhere
|
Guess I could've made my point more simply, thusly: The schtick of 'Grow up 007' flipped to 'Grow up Q', conveyed by the stern look of the elder statesman in this version of the relationship. Hope he doesn't play it like The Hour. Kind of a not seeming to take it seriously when things are put to him to respond to, but actually being deadly serious, that isn't only aspiring to be like bond, that IS bond, in broad strokes, and that kinda betrays the intent of the writer more than it helped the characterisation (IMO, of course). For a dramatic dynamic in a scene, particularly in a short character based one that is essentially a 'skit', you need opposites. You need a geek versus a gruffian, someone impressed by the other person, who isn't comfortable with someone being impressed with them, flippant versus staid, anything that gives an instant 'conflict'. But I suppose Q secretly wishing he was like Bond, or aping him in some way, regardless of his role jobwise, would fit the second of the above guffed out pairings, a potential source of conflict and humour, from one person being irritated by the other (the latter point being the nature of the previous Q/007 relationship, for sure, providing a decent edge to what are essentially scenes of 'pay attention while I provide you with an item that may save your life later, no matter how much you look at what I do like it is bullshit whenever you swagger into my workplace'). And today's prize for stating the obvious goes to...
< Message edited by jobloffski -- 12/3/2012 9:55:42 PM >
_____________________________
Yes, dreamers dream and doers do. But if dreamers DON'T dream, doers don't have anything TO do. Everything that is only here because people exist, only exists because someone thought of it., or in other words, dreamed it.
|