Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

RE: Cox in The Hobbit?

  		Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Future Films >> RE: Cox in The Hobbit? Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Cox in The Hobbit? - 17/11/2009 8:11:17 AM   
ace14

 

Posts: 127
Joined: 21/9/2006
I like the sound of Cox and Gleeson as Dwarves and would like to put forward another actor who I think would make a good Dwarf, it is against type though and I can see some on here slating it, but here goes;

James Gandolfini

I am prepared for the inevitable Tony Soprano doesn't belong in Middle Earth, but I think its casting of this sort that could surpirse and delight in equal measure

And, seeing as there is several Dwarves within the story anyone else got any ideas for the other Dwarves



_____________________________

The Dredd thread is sucking my will to live

My therapist says I have a preoccupation with vengeance. We'll see about that

(in reply to Deviation)
Post #: 151
RE: Cox in The Hobbit? - 17/11/2009 12:31:46 PM   
pete_traynor


Posts: 2877
Joined: 28/11/2006
From: Balboa Towers, Balboa Island, CA
quote:

ORIGINAL: ace14

I like the sound of Cox and Gleeson as Dwarves and would like to put forward another actor who I think would make a good Dwarf, it is against type though and I can see some on here slating it, but here goes;

James Gandolfini

I am prepared for the inevitable Tony Soprano doesn't belong in Middle Earth, but I think its casting of this sort that could surpirse and delight in equal measure

And, seeing as there is several Dwarves within the story anyone else got any ideas for the other Dwarves




Brian Blessed is surely a no brainer and coming screaming out of leftfield is the new chunkier, weirder, beardier Joaquin Phoenix. Take away the shades, plonk a dwarf hat on him, give him an axe and boom! Jobs a good un'

http://www.pophangover.com/images/joaquinbeard-1.jpg

< Message edited by pete_traynor -- 17/11/2009 12:37:37 PM >

_____________________________

BLADERUNNER EXTREMELY LMT PRINT EDITION OF ONLY 10 - http://lomierart.blogspot.co.uk/

(in reply to ace14)
Post #: 152
RE: Cox in The Hobbit? - 17/11/2009 12:34:35 PM   
pete_traynor


Posts: 2877
Joined: 28/11/2006
From: Balboa Towers, Balboa Island, CA
quote:

ORIGINAL: ace14

I like the sound of Cox and Gleeson as Dwarves and would like to put forward another actor who I think would make a good Dwarf, it is against type though and I can see some on here slating it, but here goes;

James Gandolfini

I am prepared for the inevitable Tony Soprano doesn't belong in Middle Earth, but I think its casting of this sort that could surpirse and delight in equal measure

And, seeing as there is several Dwarves within the story anyone else got any ideas for the other Dwarves




Brian Blessed is surely a no brainer and coming screaming out of leftfield is the new chunkier, weirder, beardier Joaquin Phoenix. Take away the shades, plonk a dwarf hat on him, give him an axe and boom! Jobs a good un'

http://www.pophangover.com/images/joaquinbeard-1.jpg

If that didn't work on screen I'd eat my Penguin pop up guide to Middle Earth!

< Message edited by pete_traynor -- 17/11/2009 12:38:06 PM >

_____________________________

BLADERUNNER EXTREMELY LMT PRINT EDITION OF ONLY 10 - http://lomierart.blogspot.co.uk/

(in reply to pete_traynor)
Post #: 153
RE: Cox in The Hobbit? - 21/11/2009 12:33:32 AM   
Katamarang

 

Posts: 1304
Joined: 16/10/2005
From: Generic tall building
 http://www.theonering.net/torwp/

eeeeeeeeeeeeeee

What could it be?

Brian Cox and Brendan Gleeson for dwarves sounds like an amazing plan but please for the love of Christ don't cast Brian Blessed as anything.


If this announcement is just about fucking blue ray editions of the trilogy I will be so pissed off... I want some proper news!


< Message edited by Katamarang -- 21/11/2009 12:49:32 AM >

_____________________________

It's so funny I'm haemorrhaging inside.

http://www.savethetivoli.co.uk/
please help save my local cinema cheers

(in reply to pete_traynor)
Post #: 154
RE: Cox in The Hobbit? - 23/11/2009 12:33:23 PM   
pete_traynor


Posts: 2877
Joined: 28/11/2006
From: Balboa Towers, Balboa Island, CA
quote:

ORIGINAL: Katamarang

http://www.theonering.net/torwp/

eeeeeeeeeeeeeee

What could it be?

Brian Cox and Brendan Gleeson for dwarves sounds like an amazing plan but please for the love of Christ don't cast Brian Blessed as anything.


If this announcement is just about fucking blue ray editions of the trilogy I will be so pissed off... I want some proper news!



DIIIIIVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEEE!!!! Whats not to like haha!

_____________________________

BLADERUNNER EXTREMELY LMT PRINT EDITION OF ONLY 10 - http://lomierart.blogspot.co.uk/

(in reply to Katamarang)
Post #: 155
RE: Ian McKellan says "read the script and shootin... - 21/1/2010 12:26:57 PM   
gumgum2804

 

Posts: 5
Joined: 31/3/2007
Just been listening to an interview with Nicholas Hoult (About a Boy, Skins, A Single Man) on the Guardian Film Weekly podcast and he said his next film was a big production but that he was contractually unable to talk about it.

Tenuous I know but I reckon he'd make a great Bilbo and he's soon to be seen in Clash of the Titans so his cache as an actor is certainly on the rise.
Post #: 156
RE: Ian McKellan says "read the script and shootin... - 21/1/2010 2:27:15 PM   
Sotto Voce

 

Posts: 756
Joined: 5/9/2009
I want Tom Baker to be in it.
Please.


_____________________________

All things digested have a similar hue.
Post #: 157
RE: Ian McKellan says "read the script and shootin... - 21/1/2010 2:47:11 PM   
The Hooded Man


Posts: 2717
Joined: 12/7/2006
Nicholas Hoult is Spider-Man.

_____________________________

Counting the minutes until the over zealous mods lock this thread too.

(in reply to Sotto Voce)
Post #: 158
RE: Ian McKellan says "read the script and shootin... - 21/1/2010 4:32:19 PM   
pete_traynor


Posts: 2877
Joined: 28/11/2006
From: Balboa Towers, Balboa Island, CA
quote:

ORIGINAL: The Hooded Man

Nicholas Hoult is Spider-Man.


That sounds more on it. Can't see his twatty little face as Bilbo and neither do I want to. Horrid choice!

_____________________________

BLADERUNNER EXTREMELY LMT PRINT EDITION OF ONLY 10 - http://lomierart.blogspot.co.uk/

(in reply to The Hooded Man)
Post #: 159
THE HOBBIT - 23/1/2010 7:29:51 AM   
Snake-Eyes


Posts: 9970
Joined: 1/10/2005
From: ZONE 2
 Further Delays!
 
http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/01/22/first-hobbit-movie-looks-to-be-delayed-until-the-end-of-2012/



_____________________________

"When you have to shoot, shoot don't talk."

http://www.expendablespremiere.com/index.html
Post #: 160
RE: THE HOBBIT - 26/1/2010 12:17:30 PM   
pete_traynor


Posts: 2877
Joined: 28/11/2006
From: Balboa Towers, Balboa Island, CA
quote:

ORIGINAL: Snake-Eyes

Further Delays!
 
http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/01/22/first-hobbit-movie-looks-to-be-delayed-until-the-end-of-2012/




While it's good to get the extra time to make it as good as possible I can't say I'm not disappointed. My spidey sense is also tingling so I hope that for whatever reason, this isn't a precursor to the production being abandoned. Why not use the time to reinstate Jackson as director, where he belongs. I do love Del Toro and have faith in him but his track record in Hollywood films is not great. Either Jackson back in or shoot that thing in Spanish! Wishful thinking I know…

< Message edited by pete_traynor -- 26/1/2010 12:18:52 PM >

_____________________________

BLADERUNNER EXTREMELY LMT PRINT EDITION OF ONLY 10 - http://lomierart.blogspot.co.uk/

(in reply to Snake-Eyes)
Post #: 161
RE: THE HOBBIT - 26/1/2010 7:32:46 PM   
Invader_Ace


Posts: 1523
Joined: 31/7/2008
I don't have a problem with the choice of director or even delays.  I just don't like the whole two film epic-it-up aproach.  Yes, LOTR was epic and brill, but for me The Hobbit works in an entirely different way.  Just give us a 2 hour tops, rockin' adventure film.

(in reply to pete_traynor)
Post #: 162
RE: THE HOBBIT - 27/1/2010 4:09:00 PM   
pete_traynor


Posts: 2877
Joined: 28/11/2006
From: Balboa Towers, Balboa Island, CA
quote:

ORIGINAL: Invader_Ace

I don't have a problem with the choice of director or even delays.  I just don't like the whole two film epic-it-up aproach.  Yes, LOTR was epic and brill, but for me The Hobbit works in an entirely different way.  Just give us a 2 hour tops, rockin' adventure film.


Sort of with you on that. If all of the 3 LOTR books could fit into single movies so fantastically well then why does a much shorter and simpler narrative deserve a 4/5 hour running time? But then again the though of getting to go back to Middle Earth for two years in a row is certainly a very appealing one! Surely it will be an expanded take on the Hobbit in order to set up a fluid cinematic transition to Fellowship of the Ring. The Necromancer will surely be touched upon more and I imagine Aragorn will probably be set up in it. Saruman also could be introduced in such a way to further establish his and Gandalf’s roles in Middle Earth during that period of it’s history.

_____________________________

BLADERUNNER EXTREMELY LMT PRINT EDITION OF ONLY 10 - http://lomierart.blogspot.co.uk/

(in reply to Invader_Ace)
Post #: 163
RE: THE HOBBIT - 27/1/2010 6:54:06 PM   
Invader_Ace


Posts: 1523
Joined: 31/7/2008
I know that hey intend to fill it out with Tolkien's appendixes and notes and so-on.  Which is better than them just making things up, although, there will probably be a bit of that too.  I just don't think it is needed. The producesr are clearly trying to make it a sort of LOTR 2 type affair, when personally I don't think that's how The Hobbit should be.

It's sort of retro fitting the original simple tale to fit the template of what came after (went before!) depending on how you look at it.

(in reply to pete_traynor)
Post #: 164
RE: THE HOBBIT - 28/1/2010 4:59:33 PM   
pete_traynor


Posts: 2877
Joined: 28/11/2006
From: Balboa Towers, Balboa Island, CA
quote:

ORIGINAL: Invader_Ace

I know that hey intend to fill it out with Tolkien's appendixes and notes and so-on.  Which is better than them just making things up, although, there will probably be a bit of that too.  I just don't think it is needed. The producesr are clearly trying to make it a sort of LOTR 2 type affair, when personally I don't think that's how The Hobbit should be.

It's sort of retro fitting the original simple tale to fit the template of what came after (went before!) depending on how you look at it.



Perhaps the delay might also have an impact on shooting it in S3D. Jackson is obviously very much sold on it with his upcoming take on Tintin and supposed LOTR conversions but it has been reported that Del Toro was not so keen. I think given the public response to Avatar, not to mention its performance at the box office, this discussion will step up a few notches. I was completely enamoured with the level of immersion into Pandora that Avatar conveyed, so I would champion a decision to shoot Middle Earth in this fashion.  

_____________________________

BLADERUNNER EXTREMELY LMT PRINT EDITION OF ONLY 10 - http://lomierart.blogspot.co.uk/

(in reply to Invader_Ace)
Post #: 165
Hurrah..official news - 1/4/2010 4:25:38 PM   
strider617

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 20/10/2005
The one ring.net hve posted an article on the schedule for 'The Hobbit' principal shooting starts in October , special screenings in September 2012 to coincide with 'The Hobbit' anniversary and Worldwide realease on Dec31st 2012..hurrah..break out the Longbottom leaf and pass me that pipe..!!

(in reply to gumgum2804)
Post #: 166
nope - 1/4/2010 10:00:44 PM   
Katamarang

 

Posts: 1304
Joined: 16/10/2005
From: Generic tall building
 Just an April fool I'm afraid.

_____________________________

It's so funny I'm haemorrhaging inside.

http://www.savethetivoli.co.uk/
please help save my local cinema cheers

(in reply to strider617)
Post #: 167
RE: nope - 19/4/2010 10:08:35 PM   
pete_traynor


Posts: 2877
Joined: 28/11/2006
From: Balboa Towers, Balboa Island, CA
 What with Bond 23 all but cancelled I feel like my rather pessimistic prediction for the fate of the Hobbit will be announced before too long. Seriously hope I'm wrong but have always had a feeling that this would never make it to the screen...

_____________________________

BLADERUNNER EXTREMELY LMT PRINT EDITION OF ONLY 10 - http://lomierart.blogspot.co.uk/

(in reply to Katamarang)
Post #: 168
RE: nope - 28/4/2010 6:42:56 PM   
pete_traynor


Posts: 2877
Joined: 28/11/2006
From: Balboa Towers, Balboa Island, CA
 Official release date. December 2013... this one just keeps slipping eh

http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/04/28/imax-signs-20-film-deal-with-warner-bros-release-plans-revealed-for-superman-batman-3-the-hobbit/

_____________________________

BLADERUNNER EXTREMELY LMT PRINT EDITION OF ONLY 10 - http://lomierart.blogspot.co.uk/

(in reply to pete_traynor)
Post #: 169
RE: nope - 31/5/2010 12:23:14 AM   
Rgirvan44


Posts: 18895
Joined: 10/3/2006
From: Punishment Park
 And Del Toro is out.

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/45299

Sad, but given the problems at MGM, maybe not a shock. Does this mean Jackson does it?

_____________________________

It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to, than I have ever known.


(in reply to pete_traynor)
Post #: 170
RE: nope - 31/5/2010 9:37:48 AM   
pete_traynor


Posts: 2877
Joined: 28/11/2006
From: Balboa Towers, Balboa Island, CA
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rgirvan44

And Del Toro is out.

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/45299

Sad, but given the problems at MGM, maybe not a shock. Does this mean Jackson does it?


Yeah, while maybe not this news exactly I was wholeheartedly expecting a major (negative) announcement regarding the Hobbit after the Bond 23 news. To be perfectly honest I really was expecting a Halo statement saying the project had been cancelled. This is sad news but I wonder if it won't do the film a service in the long run. GDT's Spanish language films have been, without exception, brilliant but I just leave his english movies felling hollow. The Hellboy books are probably my favourite graphic novels ever and for me he got that completely wrong and I certainly wouldn't want to see that happen here! If Jackson steps in I'll be happy. But I still wouldn't be surprised if we do see a complete cancellation statement before long. I've always had a funny feeling on this getting to the screen...

_____________________________

BLADERUNNER EXTREMELY LMT PRINT EDITION OF ONLY 10 - http://lomierart.blogspot.co.uk/

(in reply to Rgirvan44)
Post #: 171
RE: nope - 1/6/2010 9:43:46 AM   
Marwood

 

Posts: 2615
Joined: 1/10/2005
From: Only The Shadow knows
 I think it's most likely either Jackson will direct himself or the film will be pushed back or put on hold indefinitely while another director is brought on and MGM solve their problems.

Disappointed Del Toro left but totally understandable given the number of other projects he has in development. I think at this stage to get it underway and released when WB want it will be impossible unless Jackson directs; that would make sense as he's worked alongside Del Toro on the films and been involved with the pre-production work so presumably he could step into the breach without any real difficulty. However the question is whether he actually wants to; he said way back that he wasn't really up to it but I don't believe he has any other projects as director lined up right now so perhaps he would have the time, just needs the inclination.

If Jackson doesn't direct then all the work he and Del Toro did could be for nothing as bringing in a new director may mean starting over and causing further delays and expense. On the other hand a yes-man could be brought in to just get onto it with what's been done but the danger there is of a workmanlike film and the feeling that the director is just a puppet for the producers.

Think of Return of The Jedi; Richard Marquand was the hired gun but George was all over that one - the transition in tone and general kiddie flavour (bloody Ewoks) was a precursor to the crap George threw into the prequels.

I doubt Jackson would "do a Lucas" on the Tolkien saga but to make it work you need a visionary director with passion for the project - not a competent but bland director who's there because they need someone quick and are paying well (I'm looking at you Ratner). Therefore to utilise the pre-prod work already done and get this thing underway as soon as MGM can resolve their shit then Jackson is the logical choice...if he wants to do it now.

_____________________________

Bilbo: What about the Ewoks? They were rubbish.

Tim: Yeah but Jar Jar Binks makes the Ewoks look like f***ing Shaft!

(in reply to pete_traynor)
Post #: 172
RE: nope - 1/6/2010 10:13:37 AM   
jobloffski

 

Posts: 1837
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: elsewhere
 The film business is, like, risky and all, but it IS a business and I can't for the life of me see why MGM haven't been able to negotiate a special deal isolating Bond and The Hobbit from their troubles as GUARANTEED money makers that would allow them to pay off some of their debts.

Maybe I'm just being thick as duck turds, but the GUARANTEE of of a couple of Billion box office (and other income) from these two projects would, could and should act as a massive bargaining chip in any money wrangling, surely?

_____________________________

Yes, dreamers dream and doers do. But if dreamers DON'T dream, doers don't have anything TO do. Everything that is only here because people exist, only exists because someone thought of it., or in other words, dreamed it.

(in reply to Marwood)
Post #: 173
RE: nope - 1/6/2010 10:51:53 AM   
Marwood

 

Posts: 2615
Joined: 1/10/2005
From: Only The Shadow knows
 Don't think you're being thick Job but as you mentioned this is business and given the economic climate I don't think anyone's really prepared to risk anything - even if it does seem like a slam dunk.

The sharks are in the water for MGM and I'm sure they're getting a lot of bail out options but no doubt the people making those offers want more control for less money and MGM may just be turning them down. Therefore they're holding out for better offers but frankly they may not arrive and they're just getting closer to being eaten with the Tolkien & Bond rights being sold off anyway. 

I think MGM is going to collapse and Bond and Tolkien rights will find new studio homes - what that means for Daniel Craig's Bond and Peter Jackson's Hobbit films is anyone's guess. 

_____________________________

Bilbo: What about the Ewoks? They were rubbish.

Tim: Yeah but Jar Jar Binks makes the Ewoks look like f***ing Shaft!

(in reply to jobloffski)
Post #: 174
RE: nope - 1/6/2010 12:26:50 PM   
pete_traynor


Posts: 2877
Joined: 28/11/2006
From: Balboa Towers, Balboa Island, CA
quote:

ORIGINAL: Marwood

I don't believe he has any other projects as director lined up right now so perhaps he would have the time, just needs the inclination.



I think he is contractually bound to direct both the 2nd Tintin film and Immortal Engines. I would happily see both of those ousted in favour of the Hobbit though!  

_____________________________

BLADERUNNER EXTREMELY LMT PRINT EDITION OF ONLY 10 - http://lomierart.blogspot.co.uk/

(in reply to Marwood)
Post #: 175
RE: nope - 1/6/2010 3:03:33 PM   
Marwood

 

Posts: 2615
Joined: 1/10/2005
From: Only The Shadow knows
quote:

ORIGINAL: pete_traynor

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marwood

I don't believe he has any other projects as director lined up right now so perhaps he would have the time, just needs the inclination.



I think he is contractually bound to direct both the 2nd Tintin film and Immortal Engines. I would happily see both of those ousted in favour of the Hobbit though!  


I'd forgotten about Tintin but I was actually under the impression that he and Spielberg had filmed all 3 together and were in post production.

As for Immortal Engines I think you're incorrect - I believe like Temaraire (sp?) it's a book Jackson has the rights to and is interested in adaptating but hasn't made any concrete deals with production companies or studios to get it made. It's one of those deals where it was announced he wanted to do something with it but it could be "Peter Jackson's next film" in the same way that "Lincoln biopic will be Steven Spielberg's next film" - it's one of a few that he's juggling without making any firm decisions on but trades were saying it's "Peter Jackson's next film" because a lot of them take news like this and build it up to be more than it is.

_____________________________

Bilbo: What about the Ewoks? They were rubbish.

Tim: Yeah but Jar Jar Binks makes the Ewoks look like f***ing Shaft!

(in reply to pete_traynor)
Post #: 176
RE: nope - 1/6/2010 3:34:04 PM   
pete_traynor


Posts: 2877
Joined: 28/11/2006
From: Balboa Towers, Balboa Island, CA
quote:

ORIGINAL: Marwood

quote:

ORIGINAL: pete_traynor

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marwood

I don't believe he has any other projects as director lined up right now so perhaps he would have the time, just needs the inclination.



I think he is contractually bound to direct both the 2nd Tintin film and Immortal Engines. I would happily see both of those ousted in favour of the Hobbit though!  


I'd forgotten about Tintin but I was actually under the impression that he and Spielberg had filmed all 3 together and were in post production.

As for Mortal Engines I think you're incorrect - I believe like Temaraire (sp?) it's a book Jackson has the rights to and is interested in adaptating but hasn't made any concrete deals with production companies or studios to get it made. It's one of those deals where it was announced he wanted to do something with it but it could be "Peter Jackson's next film" in the same way that "Lincoln biopic will be Steven Spielberg's next film" - it's one of a few that he's juggling without making any firm decisions on but trades were saying it's "Peter Jackson's next film" because a lot of them take news like this and build it up to be more than it is.


Only one Tintin has finished principal (mo cap) photography and each has only one director. Film 1: Spielberg. Film 2: Jackson and Film 3: TBC

That’s initially what I thought about Mortal Engines (sorry, got the name wrong in my post) but there are a couple of Weta insiders here who thinks differently:

http://marketsaw.blogspot.com/2010/04/exclusive-weta-update-mortal-engines-in.html

Could be incorrect but this guy’s sources are usually pretty reliable. But I’m sure at this stage ME probably wouldn’t be too hard to pull out of. Tintin will be altogether a much trickier proposition I should think though.  


_____________________________

BLADERUNNER EXTREMELY LMT PRINT EDITION OF ONLY 10 - http://lomierart.blogspot.co.uk/

(in reply to Marwood)
Post #: 177
RE: nope - 14/7/2010 12:35:00 AM   
Your Funny Uncle


Posts: 11131
Joined: 14/11/2005
From: The Deepest Depths Of Joypad.....
 So Jackson it is and it looks like he's already started casting proceedings on the sly! Awesome news!

_____________________________

Empires Top 100 Movie Characters of All Time! - VOTE NOW by clicking HERE

(in reply to pete_traynor)
Post #: 178
RE: nope - 14/7/2010 11:09:10 AM   
pete_traynor


Posts: 2877
Joined: 28/11/2006
From: Balboa Towers, Balboa Island, CA
quote:

ORIGINAL: Your Funny Uncle

So Jackson it is and it looks like he's already started casting proceedings on the sly! Awesome news!


Read this over at slashfilm. But I think this project is totally out of control now. I want this as much as the next guy but it’s like the rumour equivalent of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill now! It’s relentless. Just sack it off for now as it’s not coming together… at all. Give it five years; by which time the financial shenanigans will hopefully be a distant memory and it can be done properly with someone who wants to direct for the right reasons.  I wanted Jackson from the off but if he is now only stepping into the breach to protect studio interests then it’s not the most reassuring reason for him to helm this project. It’s just infuriating that they can’t sort it. If ComicCon brings no concrete news then I anticipate a Hobbit cancellation statement within months. Just a bad feeling but I’ve always had a suspicion that the Hobbit would never make it to the screen. God I hope I’m wrong!

_____________________________

BLADERUNNER EXTREMELY LMT PRINT EDITION OF ONLY 10 - http://lomierart.blogspot.co.uk/

(in reply to Your Funny Uncle)
Post #: 179
RE: nope - 22/7/2010 2:21:03 PM   
Emyr Thy King


Posts: 2153
Joined: 13/4/2006
From: The Grid
 Thanks for that cheery and uplifting statement for the weekend.

_____________________________

"This whole imbroglio is epiphenomenal"...."demigogic faux egalitarianism" - Will Self

(in reply to pete_traynor)
Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Future Films >> RE: Cox in The Hobbit? Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.109