jobloffski
Posts: 1837
Joined: 30/9/2005 From: elsewhere
|
There is a lot wrong with JP3 The story reason for needing to go back to the island, utter crap (admittedly. 'there's a site B?' in TLW was dumb, but audaciously so). The ending, the armed forces turn up in time to save the day, utter bollocks. In between the opening and the ending, cobblers of gigantic proportions with quite funny little moments (stay absolutely still, then people have buggered of while he's talking. But, ultimately, Crichton's story is(as Crichton's stories often are) ' in sutiation X you should think about why you're doing what you're doing, because if you aren't absolutely sure of the possible consequences, those consequences will bite you in the ass' (See Westworld, Rising Sun and practically every other Crichton spin on the frankenstein theme). This is the reason that JP works in the way no sequel could, since after the 'ooh, scientists better take care' stuff, it then becomes all about watching the dinosaurs run around. The idea of 'we must destroy what has been created so that we can redress the natural balance is the natural successor to the creation of the dinosaurs, but that's not so easy to market, so all sequels end up being processions of dino related death that occur after spurious reasons to be back in the park (or the other park not originally mentioned).
< Message edited by jobloffski -- 5/4/2006 4:59:28 PM >
_____________________________
Yes, dreamers dream and doers do. But if dreamers DON'T dream, doers don't have anything TO do. Everything that is only here because people exist, only exists because someone thought of it., or in other words, dreamed it.
|