JRockwell
Posts: 114
Joined: 26/6/2007
|
A lot of people saying their issue with Cruise is he's always playing himself and I don't agree with this. He's been in so many films that at this stage of his career he'd be dealing with this criticism whether he was a normal human being or not. I think his issue is the quality of the film he chooses. Look at his IMDB page. He was excellent in Top Gun, The Colour of Money, Rain Man (he should've won the Oscar), Born on the Fourth of July (any other year he would've won the Oscar but Day-Lewis was My Left Foot), Days of Thunder, A Few Good Men, The Firm, Interview With The Vampire, Mission Impossible, Jerry MaGuire, Eyes Wide Shut, Magnolia (he should've won the Oscar not Benigni and I love La Vita è Bella), The Last Samurai and he was awesome in Collateral. I don't think his problem is playing to type. He has a range, it's not massive but it ain't bad. And when he's on song and with the right director he can be so watchable. If Collateral was 5 hours long and he had to kill 15 people that night I would watch it transfixed. Credit to Mann for the beauty and knowing Cruise could be it, but Cruise nailed it. So, what have we learnt? Nothing wrong with him as an actor, just in his choices of film. And he should play the bad guy more. And when the aliens do invade and he's in his $10 million bunker and we're all getting blasted, who'll be laughing then?
|