Flatulent_Bob
Posts: 7788
Joined: 30/9/2005
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: directorscut quote:
ORIGINAL: Flatulent_Bob quote:
ORIGINAL: directorscut quote:
ORIGINAL: Harry Tuttle quote:
ORIGINAL: directorscut Ireland is a far better footballer than Milner and I say that as someone who wants to strangle the punk for nothing playing for his country. This deal strikes me as a mini-Zlatan for Eto'o + €70 million debacle. 6-0 was a nice bit of karma for chairmen messing around with managers. In that case shouldn't you want to strangle Stephen Hunt? Did I miss some news? Did Hunt quit Ireland? I have never seen Stephen Hunt give less tahn 100% when he played for Ireland. Yeah who does the chairman think he is expecting the manager to stick to a sizeable wage bill after spending more than Man Utd, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool and not progressing. Over a period of how many years? O'Neill has had to completely rebuild the team since he took over. He spent £120 million doing that. Ferguson has spent £120 million on four players. When O'Neill took over the team were in 16th place, since then they've finised 11th, 6th, 6th and 6th, so yes I'd say progress has been made; when he took over they were a team in a dire position, now they are a team who consistantly finish in the top six. The majority of chairmen know jack about football and they should keep their noses out of it. Watch as Villa start to slip out of the top half of the league, O'Neill's "not progressing" at 6th will seem a long way off. Since O'Neill took over he has spent more than anyone other than City and Spurs. That's a fact and he paid a lot of money for players he doesn't use and also paid them large wages. The issue which he left over was because he wanted more players but wouldn't trim the wage bill. You can't just keep upping the wage bill to unaffordable level, that is one thing that has to balance. How much did he pay for the likes of Davies transfer fee and wages who he isn't using and then wanted more money? Chairman may know jack about football and as far as I know the chairman never interfered with team affairs. To use your line, managers know jack about running a football club and balancing the wage bill, they are always 3 players short and part of O'Neils job is to ensure the wage bill is balanced. He wouldn't do this and wanted to risk the future of the club against him qualifying for the Champions League. Something he had failed to get close to despite massive backing. O'Neil refused to manage the club properly and the board wouldn't take the huge risk and so he walked. He should have a look at the likes of Leeds and see what happens when chairman back managers cavalier attitudes. Villa may slip from 6th but I bet O'Neill doesn't get a job anywhere near that level.
< Message edited by Flatulent_Bob -- 25/8/2010 11:17:37 AM >
_____________________________
I'm your huckleberry... All the world will be your enemy, Prince of a Thousand enemies. And when they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you; digger, listener, runner, Prince with the swift warning. Be cunning, and full of tricks, and your people will never be destroyed. Oh my God! They banned Kenny!
|