boys_dont_cry
Posts: 542
Joined: 30/9/2005
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BigKovacs quote:
ORIGINAL: boys_dont_cry quote:
ORIGINAL: BigKovacs That's a fair point, it looks pretty short and there only about 7 enemy types. Still, the idea is as sound as a pound and good multiplayer can drag a games lifespan on for months. COD 4s a good example. But COD was a huge game, like Gears I can imagine people will be playing it till the next one comes out. L4D seems a bit of a niche...I can see it getting the same audience and thus will have less of an online lifespan. Despite all the negative comments, I think it looks brilliant......just a bit worried about sepening £50 on a game that might only have a few months in it.... Cod wasn't a huge game. The single player campaign could be nailed in a weekend and there wasn't much point in playing it again unless you're an achievement hound. The Multiplayer was so good though it's kept people playing it to the same level of Gears and Halo. I agree that L4D is more of a niche game and may not draw as many fans as COD but since it's built for multiplayer and has a very unique versus system I think it will go down a storm online. But as said before there are only 4 (maybe 5) locales and something like 7 weapons which for next gen is hardly stella. In it's defence it's basically Counter Strike with zombies and thats gotten away with such limits for years. Either way I'm dying to play it. No no no no, you missunderstand me! Sorry, I ment it was a hughly hyped game, TV adverts, adverts at the cinema, front cover of all the magazines.......I cant see L4D getting the same coverage in the media which will mean less peole playing it.
_____________________________
http://flavors.me/gavweir
|