appleby
Posts: 28
Joined: 4/3/2008
|
I have had the misfortune to watch various segments of mamma mia (work in a cinema so have to 'check' screens etc), i have to echo the sentiments expressed here, i have never had a more cringe worthy cinema experience. Embarrassment is the best description of this film, embarrassed for the actors, the audience anyone else that has to endure a minute of this lazy, blandly directed, irritating waste of space. Countless times ive heard the argument, that it great and somehow empowering to see older women singing and dancing and having 'fun', i don't want to sound sexist or even ageist but steep et all come across like right slappers, to put it bluntly. I can't understand why someone like Streep in particular is involved in this. This film baffles and angers me more than any in recent years...and i haven't even seen the whole film (but most of it). also as pointed out, there are various annoying cultural and age continuity issues, colin Firths character was a punk? Pierce Brosnans a flower power hippy, theres a line about how they dated in the 60's...yet they both dated at a similar time? The songs are also so clumsily shoe horned into the plot its quite unbelievable, im not sure if the sets are intentionally cheap looking to create some sort of stage show feel... having said all this it sells out almost every screening we do, people leave the cinema with a glow and vow to come back and see it again... someone explain to me why this film is doing so well? Mark kermode said in his review something like 'its so awful its good', are people watching this ironically? who knows.
|