jimoakley666
Posts: 578
Joined: 26/5/2006 From: Wales
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: britesparc jimoakley, I sorta know what you mean - if I'm honest, I don't normally buy Superman titles, either (I'm far more into Batman, as you may have gathered from my total man-crush on Dick Grayson). But I don't think necessarily he's a stagnant character. As someone who does lots of writing myself, I think there's loads of mileage in someone essentially godlike who feels shackled by his powers, unable to relate to normal people, etc, etc. But it's true that it makes him much harder to write for than characters such as Wolvie and Bats, who have many other facets and suchlike. Plus I stand by my argument that he's an icon of the genre, and should be represented as such. However, I was directing my post more at people like this: quote:
ORIGINAL: puggled Superman is a one dimensional frustated gay bloke that can't even cop off with Louis Lane. Christ what next another Bush in power. Ah. I see. I'm still not sold on argument for Superman's number 1 status for any other reason than he was pretty much first on the scene. He's iconographic for the same reason as Mickey Mouse, but wouldn't call him the greatest cartoon character though. Love your Avitar thingy though, ha ha.
_____________________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
|