HIroProtagonist
Posts: 294
Joined: 6/3/2007 From: Dudley, West Midlands
|
I'm a little late joining the party - but better later than never The Catcher in The Rye. J.D. Salinger, 1951, United States of America. The Catcher in The Rye tells the story (to an extent) of Holden Caulfield, J.D. Salingers' Protagonist. Written by a 17 year old Holden, the story focuses both on the events that led to him being expelled from Pencey Prep School, and the events of the next two days, leading up to his return home (Which happened when the character was 16). So I've now read The Catcher in The Rye three times. The first time I was around 14, the second time, 18 and now again at the age of 24. I've gotta say that my general opinion of the book hasn't changed over the years - I can appreciate that the book is a classic, but I still don't like the character of Holden, or indeed the book itself. That might sound a little bit strange, but let me use a movie analogy. Films like Metropolis (1926) & Citizen Kane (1941) are both classics, in terms of their impact on the "language of films" - i.e. they totally changed the way that films are made. Catcher in The Rye is the same, though in terms of it's impact on literature, and indeed popular culture. However, where as I like Metropolis & Citizen Kane, I don't like Catcher. Put simply, on a technical level I can appreciate it, but I can't take it to heart, in the way that many people have / will continue to do. The simple reason for this, is the central protagonist - Holden. Whilst I agree that you don't have to absoultely like your central character, you have to at least be intrigued with them - a recent example from another book that I reviewed for another book club, is Rob Gordan in Nick Hornbys' High Fidelity. Rob is shown via his actions to be a bit of a dick (to say the least), but his other actions help to make him interesting, and relatible (sp?) to. Although Holden undoubtedly has some positive character traits (such as his devotion to his Brothers & Sister), his generally "whiny" attitude makes him a little bit to difficult to relate to, at least from my point of view. Maybe it just depens on your view of life - I'd imagine Emo kids would love The Catcher in The Rye :) but personally I'm not a fan of characters who just sit around and moan. Something that Kilo_T_Mortal mentioned, Re: The fact that the book just starts, and doesn't really conclude - I did like that aspect of the book, though I've always held the view that the book is written the way it is, because Holden has been told, as part of a therapy exercise, to write about the events that resulted in him being where he is, which, in my opinion, is a mental hospital. I know that's a point of view that not everyone agrees with, but that's always been my personal interpretation - basically I always took the viewpoint that Holden suffers either a partial, or complete, mental breakdown in the penultimate chapter, and that as a result of this he's hospitalised, with the intention of getting him to a state of mind where he'd be capable of starting at a new school (which is something that he mentions in the final chapter). So that's about it - to sum the above up, I like it from a technical point of view, but I don't like the story or the character.
_____________________________
Last Five Films at the Cinema: True Grit Never Let Me Go. The Fighter. 127 Hours. The Kings Speech.
|