a_new_power
Posts: 285
Joined: 10/9/2006
|
Can someone help me with this P.G thing... Now I'm all for this era of wrestling because lets face it, most of what was done in the late nineties early twenties was quite extreme and inappropriate for children. However last night John Cena called Eve a Ho and skank which is just as inappropriate for children, not to mention saying the word B*TC*. The other thing that bothers me is that it's ok for kids to feel like punching and kicking is an appropriate way to settle things and using objects becomes faar too violent or extreme for a child. When I was a kid I used to watch animations like Tom and Jerry who relied on objects to beat the hell out of each other, all be it for comedy purposes but objects nonetheless - and we as kids turned out fine. The point I'm trying to make, is this, wrestling is wrestling, and it's always been a program that has relied on objects and gimmicks and other means to keep things interesting or fresh for the viewer, now I'm not saying that it needs this constantly, but does have to rely on this aspect of entertainment and wrestling variety for a different and more compelling action for people and fans to watch- So, what I'm asking you guys is: what is this P.G era about? and who decides what's appropriate and what's not? Because at the moment this P.G child friendly approach makes no sense to me. BTW undertakers promo's as of late have been the best WWE and he have ever come up with for the undertaker, more the vignettes than anything else. HHH vs Taker 3 - Fuming about that because the record becomes ludicrous. J.R said on one of his blogs, he hates it when people say why is there another HHH match? He also said, that people should just enjoy the match because it will be great whatever the case. It probably will, but that's irrelevant because the record itself becomes farcical. It's like me saying I beat my brother 50 times in a row - So for that record to have any substance, giving the same wrestler countless opportunities kinda defeats the object of what the record means. So yes J.R, it matters who faces Taker at Mania because other people need the exposure the records needs to have different opponents constantly, and we as fans deserve a different story at Mania. Also what the hell was up with that blasted crowd whatting taker when he was talking. I just wanted Taker to say: "say WHAT again, if you have sex with your own sister!" - Asshole crowd! I kinda feel sorry for EVE - who by the way is the worst actress ever! But still, that kiss was a two way thing and then treating it as if it was all EVE's doing, I felt sorry for her just because Cena is the man! Well at least in Vince's eyes that's the case... This whining about the Rock is really beginning to bug me. If you, John Cena did these gigs for free, then I could say yes, John Cena is doing this for the fans and you're right Cena, Rock is a fraudster. However you (Cena) get a bunch load a money to turn up on WWE programs one a daily basis and give shite wrestling matches with even shite promo's. And that's good for you Cena! Rock gets paid a bunch load of money to keep fit and healthy to do movies. He doesn't have to risk that by turning up to any wrestling match or Pay Per View and risk his body or time for something that pays far less. So to me it's the Rock who's doing this for the fans and not some Yes guy, who'd run a mile from the company if he had a movie career. Plus the Elimination Chamber as a whole was pretty lame. On the plus side I'm glad Santino got some air time. If used well, he could be a great entertainment aspect of WWE, but it seems they just don't know how to use him which is kinda sad.
< Message edited by a_new_power -- 22/2/2012 3:11:16 PM >
_____________________________
"A coward is a hero with a wife, kids, and a mortgage."
|