frankie
Posts: 937
Joined: 30/9/2005 From: Manchester
|
Didn't need a second thought to vote on this. It's Temple of Doom every time for me, and like Ian Nathan I despair of Spielberg's insitence on making it OK to disown it as part of the trilogy. For me, Doom is almost the perfect movie, especially when you're 12 years old. It's exciting, funny, scary and Harrison ford is at his best. I soo wanted to be Indy after seeing this. I merely liked him after watching Raiders. Just because Raiders is the original, it doesn't make it the best. Don't get me wrong i really love raiders, but as i've said before on here, i think that when raiders is good, it's sublime, but when it's not, well, it's just a tad bit dull to be honest. As for Crusade, well bar the River phoenix scenes it never did much for me. It's not nearly as memorable as the first 2 movies, has no really original set pieces and worst of all tries far too hard to be another Raiders based, in my opinion, on the poor critical response for Doom. I like it more nowadays, but it's certainly the black sheep for me. I'm just hoping Crystal Skull will impress me more (and it's worth noting that i'm very very excited about it), but I fear it will make the same mistake as Crusade in emulating the wrong episode. Let's face it, it's gonna be nowt like the Temple of Doom. I think a lot of us base which is our favourite on how we felt about them as kids. Where we were when they came out, their impact on our then emotional values and how we responded at the time. But what about deciding this debate by seeing how today's children ('cos kids are the target audience after all) rate them after objectively viewing the trilogy as a whole? Well, my own kids will only watch Raiders and Crusade by skipping to the set pieces. Doom holds their attention throughout. That's proof enough for me.
_____________________________
A gay drink for my gay friend, and a normal drink for me because I am normal.
|