Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Follow us on   
Search   
Forum Home Register for Free! Log In Moderator Tickets FAQ Users Online

Forgetting Sarah Marshall

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> Forgetting Sarah Marshall Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Forgetting Sarah Marshall - 23/4/2008 6:09:39 PM   
Empire Admin

 

Posts: 26334
Joined: 29/6/2005
Post your comments on this article
Post #: 1
Great fun - 23/4/2008 6:09:39 PM   
Starscream


Posts: 5222
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Cats Lair
Another great movie from the Apatow stable. The casting has been done very well and its the first time Edward Scissorhands hasn't irritated me. Funniest movie so far this year.

5/5

< Message edited by Starscream -- 23/4/2008 6:12:47 PM >


_____________________________

The allspark will be mine!

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 2
You sound like your from lanndann! - 23/4/2008 6:09:41 PM   
Starscream


Posts: 5222
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: Cats Lair
Double post

< Message edited by Starscream -- 23/4/2008 8:34:51 PM >

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 3
RE: You sound like your from lanndann! - 24/4/2008 10:52:28 AM   
Titanm21


Posts: 1166
Joined: 18/10/2006
From: The Womb
Watched it last night. I've seen better by those guys but funny none the less

_____________________________

www.uniquemick@Blogspot.com
www.TrailerHouseMusings@Blogspot.com

(in reply to Starscream)
Post #: 4
RE: You sound like your from lanndann! - 24/4/2008 11:52:35 AM   
Mojo


Posts: 6044
Joined: 30/9/2005
From: The CIC, next to the old man.
I really liked it, very funny and very touching.

_____________________________

Let's shove a stick up that wolf's ass.

(in reply to Titanm21)
Post #: 5
RE: You sound like your from lanndann! - 25/4/2008 8:22:36 AM   
Wilbert


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/10/2005
From: Dublin: Ireland
Pretty good but it seemed like the main guy had it in his contract that he had to show his meat and two veg every thirty minutes.

_____________________________

You're killing Independent George!!!!

(in reply to Mojo)
Post #: 6
- 25/4/2008 6:56:17 PM   
odddaze


Posts: 916
Joined: 1/7/2007
fantastic, laughed heavily through out the whole movie. The dracula musical is great, Russell Brand is playing himself but funnier. Jason Segal has created characters who are sweet and interesting, better than last years over rated (but still great) Superbad, not as good as Knocked Up

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 7
RE: - 26/4/2008 4:55:10 AM   
KolonelKlink

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 10/1/2008
I really wanted to love this movie. Big fan of the Apatow gang, and i think my expectations might have been too high going into this one. It felt like half the movie was hilariously awesome, but it seemed disjointed. Still, Segel is great, and Crime Scene: Scene of the crime was worth the price of admission alone.

'Can someone say, catfight?'

(in reply to odddaze)
Post #: 8
- 26/4/2008 4:08:50 PM   
cluesy

 

Posts: 164
Joined: 11/10/2005
Strong three star film here, it's not quite as inventive as some of the Apatow crew comedies but it had solid laughs. Jason Segel looks like one to watch for the future and Russell Brand was surprisingly better than tolerable. Well worth a watch.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 9
RE: - 29/4/2008 11:06:01 AM   
captain jack harknes


Posts: 1259
Joined: 21/2/2007
From: South Wales
Really funny and enjoyable film - was laughing throughout.  Great cast but does that curly haired guy - it is Jonah Hill? - have to be in everything!!!!

_____________________________

"The arctic has no respect for fashion, Vince"

"I ain't no one's trophy."

"You got it, Allison. You got it RAW!"

(in reply to cluesy)
Post #: 10
boom operater - 30/4/2008 7:19:47 AM   
lagedor

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 14/11/2007
From: clare, ireland
funny film, disastrous editing. who edited this? Stevie wonder? how did they not catch the multiple boom shots? whats worse is that it wasn't even given its own credit, as its performance was at least better than veronica mars

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 11
boom operater - 30/4/2008 7:19:57 AM   
lagedor

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 14/11/2007
From: clare, ireland
funny film, disastrous editing. who edited this? Stevie wonder? how did they not catch the multiple boom shots? whats worse is that it wasn't even given its own credit, as its performance was at least better than veronica mars

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 12
Very average - 30/4/2008 2:13:03 PM   
Workshed


Posts: 2471
Joined: 11/11/2005
From: somewhere near barstow on the edge of the desert
Well, what can I say. Jason (look at my cock) Segel was bareble, Jonah Hill was wasted. The best things in this movie were Russell Brand and Paul Rudd who needed more screen time. I agree about the bad editing. The film should have been 90 minutes and this could be easily achieved by ending takes before they got overlong and unfunny. It was a decent movie, don't get me wrong, but comming off the back of Knocked Up and Superbad, I expected better. It just seemed too reliant on seeing a cock for shock value, but this is Britain and nudity isn't nearly as shocking as it is in the States. I look foward to seeing more from Brand in the future.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 13
Very average - 30/4/2008 2:13:06 PM   
Workshed


Posts: 2471
Joined: 11/11/2005
From: somewhere near barstow on the edge of the desert
Well, what can I say. Jason (look at my cock) Segel was bareble, Jonah Hill was wasted. The best things in this movie were Russell Brand and Paul Rudd who needed more screen time. I agree about the bad editing. The film should have been 90 minutes and this could be easily achieved by ending takes before they got overlong and unfunny. It was a decent movie, don't get me wrong, but comming off the back of Knocked Up and Superbad, I expected better. It just seemed too reliant on seeing a cock for shock value, but this is Britain and nudity isn't nearly as shocking as it is in the States. I look foward to seeing more from Brand in the future.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 14
Loved it. - 1/5/2008 9:50:59 PM   
VincentHanna


Posts: 936
Joined: 3/10/2005
From: 30 minutes walk from Manchester city centre.
Funnier than I thought it would be, even thought I thought it would fall into the "alright" category.
Everyone was good in it. Segel was very good. Brand was good as well.
Paul Rudd and Jonah Hill both had me laughing at pretty much every scene there were in.
What about Mila Kunis?
Damn, she's nice and hot. And that's even next to Kristin Bell.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 15
Enjoyable, but not worth the $10 - 2/5/2008 11:58:44 AM   
topazzzz

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2008
The best aspect of the movie was Segal’s attempt at making a situation that should not normally be laughed at, actually funny, because at times, I found myself and my friends laughing hysterically. But there were also several scenes where the entire theater was dead silent. The appearance of Segal’s “goods” were shockingly hilarious, creating an awkward mood on screen between his character and Kristen Bell’s character, but after awhile, it just became overkill. The movie even ended with a shot of his privates; it seemed like they were going for a record.
I also think that Kristen Bell was badly casted for this movie. Perhaps it’s because I enjoy her acting in general, or because she seemed too out of place with the rest of the cast. I have to agree with the fact that the group scenes were much more memorable than those that formed the “meat of the cookie-cutter love-triangle story”. But that could have been their way of getting some form of humor into the film. I will forever remember the Dracula musical. I thought it was quite brilliant and humorous, but then again, it had nothing to do with the plot.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 16
Average-Yeah Right - 4/5/2008 12:50:49 PM   
t_bell


Posts: 182
Joined: 16/12/2007
From: Dullsville
I'm sorry but it was just too damn hilarious. I should really knock some stars off for shoddy editing or other minor errors but to be honest I was too hysterical to notice!

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 17
RE: Pretty Good - 4/5/2008 10:32:24 PM   
The REAL Bozz


Posts: 3273
Joined: 15/5/2007
Wasn't expecting much from this. ( I wanted to see Iron Man but the vote was for this) so I was surprised at how much I enjoyed it. I never rated The 40 Year Old Virgin and thought that this was a much better film. Still aint seen Knocked Up although I may have to check it out now.

_____________________________

Films I've watched
Star Trek Into Darkness ***
Iron Man 3 *****
Evil Dead (2013) ***
Bait 3D ***

(in reply to t_bell)
Post #: 18
RE: Formulaic Fun - 9/5/2008 9:33:22 PM   
Piles


Posts: 5531
Joined: 6/8/2007
From: Whalley Range
Forgetting Sarah Marshall (2008, Nicholas Stoller)
 
After Knocked Up and Superbad, it was quite clear that producer Judd Apatow was on a bit of a role. He'd re-invented the rom-com genre, and was marking out his territory as the king of quirk. 2007 was his year, and as his first film to be brought out in 2008, Forgetting Sarah Marshall had a lot to live up to. Compared to the quirky genius of Superbad and Knocked Up, Sarah Marshall was destined to be that difficult third movie. So, does it live up to the very high standard set by its predecessors? The answer is an unfortunate 'no'. That's not to say that Sarah Marshall is a bad film, because it's most certainly not awful. Indeed, the comedic prowess is there for all to see. It boasts a whole host of hilarious set-ups, usually revolving around Russell Brand's rock star Alduos Snow, who has run off with Peter Bretter's (Jason Segel) celebrity girlfriend Sarah Marshall (Kristen Bell). However, fate's on Peter's side, thanks to the introduction of quirky hotel receptionist Rachel Jansen (Kristen Bell), who takes pity on her customer but inevitably begins to fall for the loveable loser.
 
The laughs stem, mostly, from the supporting cast. Jonah Hill's Snow-stalker is suitably lecherous, whose affectionate approaches towards his rock star idol are constantly pushed away but never manage to dent the young waiter's spirits. Equally hilarious is Paul Rudd as laid back surfer dude Chuck, who Segel's Peter thinks he's found a friend in only to realise that he has to re-introduce himself after every re-meeting. Bill Hader is fantastically funny in the small time he's given as Peter's brother-in-law, but he's sorely underused. Sarah Marshall's real star is, obviously, Russell Brand, whose performance is much more successful than his showing in 2007's St Trinian's. His broad (and unmasked) Essex accent sometimes clashes with the American background, but his eloquent vocabulary and his incredibly skilled bodywork. But the main pitfall with Sarah Marshall is that this high standard that the supporting cast sets is simply not met by its principal cast members. The most successful character-wise is Kristen Bell's Sarah Marshall, who manages to be sympathetic and aggravating in equal measures. But this great character development isn't backed up by any comedic talent whatsoever. Mila Kunis' Rachel Jansen is a ridiculous, two-dimensional caricature who doesn't do anything other than supply an adequate love interest for Segel's Bretter, who is also a failure. No one who's being chased around by Kristen Bell and Mila Kunis can ever be called a 'loser'.
 
There's a lot of fun to be had in the middle Hawaii segment that rests in the middle of the film, because that's where a lot of the main characters exclusively reside. Hill's Michael the Waiter and Rudd's Chuck go out of the window as soon as we return home, thus making the central segment clearly the most enjoyable and, therefore, the funniest. However, off the island there's a distinct lack of pace to the point of lag. The first twenty minutes concentrate on Segel's moping Peter feeling sorry for himself, a segment that is both overlong and unfunny. Of course, there has to be some sentimental moments, but to put that segment at the opening of the film is a bad move as we don't get inducted with a bang. The last twenty, too, could have been left off with the same effect had the director decided not to comply to usual rom-com structure. This move isn't a favourable one, leaving us with an unsavoury taste in our mouths and a feeling that we've seen this all before.
 
Verdict
Formulaic fun from the Apatow bunch that doesn't quite live up to the standard of his earlier films. There's still a lot of laughs to be had, mostly thanks to Rudd, Hader, Hill and Brand, but it's all just a little bit too obvious to be great. 5/10.


< Message edited by Piles -- 9/5/2008 9:36:39 PM >


_____________________________

Top 100 Moz Songs / Top 100 Films

(in reply to The REAL Bozz)
Post #: 19
- 10/5/2008 7:40:02 PM   
jonjon2nd

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 31/12/2007
Had some good jokes, but not as good a Knocked Up. Still worth watching though.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 20
Deary me - 14/5/2008 12:23:39 PM   
Dante3000

 

Posts: 59
Joined: 16/10/2006
I got bored. Russel Brand stole all the funny lines and I don't even like him.
A shame.. but sadly, far from hilarious

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 21
Deary me - 14/5/2008 12:23:52 PM   
Dante3000

 

Posts: 59
Joined: 16/10/2006
I got bored. Russel Brand stole all the funny lines and I don't even like him.
A shame.. sadly, far from hilarious

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 22
RE: Deary me - 16/5/2008 5:50:28 PM   
bruce_banner

 

Posts: 18
Joined: 16/5/2008
it was a good film, although it is around 20 minutes too long, and Kristin Bell and Mila Kunis are underused and not written that well. puppet Dracula is hysterical and Jason Segal makes a very good leading man as he has the comedic timing of Carell or Rogen but with better looks. he also isn't afraid to get naked, which is either a good thig or a bad thing depending on who you are. 

(in reply to Dante3000)
Post #: 23
Am I The Only One? - 15/9/2008 11:50:14 AM   
kostas

 

Posts: 10
Joined: 17/3/2008
Do You Know what it means to lose 2 hours of your life? What do you find in the Apatow movies so much that I cant see it? Is it the nudity or the cursing? (whenever-whatever). Is it the hilarious jokes? (Forgive me for not laughing with the "where is Christ" joke, I have a thing with me religion, its called respect.
Can I put a - beside my rating?

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 24
Am I The Only One? - 15/9/2008 11:54:52 AM   
kostas

 

Posts: 10
Joined: 17/3/2008
Do You Know what it means to lose 2 hours of your life? What do you find in the Apatow movies so much that I cant see it? Is it the nudity or the cursing? (whenever-whatever). Is it the hilarious jokes? (Forgive me for not laughing with the "where is Christ" joke, I have a thing with me religion, its called respect.
Can I put a - beside my rating?

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 25
Predecitable But Funny. - 22/9/2008 11:43:46 AM   
joanna likes films

 

Posts: 987
Joined: 27/10/2007
From: Bexhill
Me and my sister watched this last night and we thought it was very funny but I knew what would happen in the end without even seeing it. It's very predecitable, not very fair to a romantic comedy and that the couple who spilt are not really the kind you would root to. The hilarous Russell Brand was brilliant in this but he was hardly in it, they should have used him more with his laugh-out loud jokes and that hair! There's nothing really poor about this movie, it's just a little too long and the story wasn't full-blown wow. But it was enjoyable for a Sunday night.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 26
Forgetting Sarah Marshall - 21/10/2008 3:11:37 PM   
AxelB

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 21/10/2008
From: Iceland
The positive buzz on Sarah Marhsall has gotten me hyped up to see it and when i was brought a copy of the DVD i slammed the disc right into the player and sat down ready to laugh alot. Unfortunetly i was far away from being laughed out when the movie finished and was very dissapointed so i hit the play button on the remote after the credits rolled(yeah im a man who ikes seeing some after-film credits once in a while) . After a second viewing my opinion on the film had not changed a bit. The main problem was that most of the jokes were not striking any nerve and went on to long. The character of Peter is supposed to be sympathetic but i just get annoyed by his whining and depression after a short period and stop feeling sorry for him before the first half of the film is over.
The secondary characters where very dispensable and there were some inside gags with two of them that were underdeveloped and didn´t go anywhere.
The ending of the film was pretty endeering but it doesn´t make up for the many shots of Peter´s penis or the lenght of the film.

Maybe it´s just me but i don´t find it funny when people are whining through almost all of the movie and the gags and subplots don´t go anywhere. Pretty weak entry from the Apatow production gang.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 27
totally unfunny - 23/11/2008 6:18:05 PM   
moviemaniac2


Posts: 525
Joined: 17/9/2006
the first major mis- step by producer Judd Apatow , after a run of pretty decent comedies. By definition a comedy should be somewhat funny - but this crap didnt register for me. It was totally formulaic and very flat

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 28
Sarah Marshall - 29/11/2008 3:25:25 PM   
lynnshep


Posts: 428
Joined: 17/1/2007
From: USA
Hysterical, bold, funny. Brilliant. Great work by Segel, Bell, Kunis, and Rudd, but Brand steals the movie. I can not think of him serenading Bell without giggling.

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 29
- 8/2/2009 4:59:52 PM   
shawshank prisoner


Posts: 1650
Joined: 20/4/2006
From: Norwich
8/10

(in reply to Empire Admin)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews >> Forgetting Sarah Marshall Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources
 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.125