kenada_woo
Posts: 1669
Joined: 30/9/2005
|
"It’s extremely rare in modern cinema to see a film that strikes you as genuinely new. Not just excellent – we’ve been spoiled in that department in the last six months – but properly like nothing that you’ve laid eyes on before. In the last fifteen years, Pulp Fiction, Scream, The Matrix and arguably Bourne and Jurassic Park have all done it, shaking out genres as old as celluloid and making them seem sparkly new, becoming future templates in the process. Cloverfield could come to be equally revered and imitated, such is its level of whip-smart invention and brilliant simplicity. It’s a film that treads the well-worn steps of many monster movies past, but flits through them as if on virgin territory." So if I were someone who were swayed by reviews of a film I would be going into Cloverfield expecting a "life changing film experience" like The Matrix, Pulp Fiction and Jurassic Park or am I reading it wrong? Bold statements. Hopefully its not along the lines of "It’s all about heart — not that the spectacle falters; this is the finest popular entertainment since the Rings trilogy closed. Superman doesn’t fly — he soars." (Superman Returns). I'll make my own opinion of it, of course, but I dont think the film needed anymore hype than the opening to the review
_____________________________
http://dereksdontrunfilms.blogspot.co.uk/ "You bailed out a Jamaican street named Monkey the other day, I want him. This other piece of shit, Screwface, I want him. I know you're a scumbag and a puke, I don't mind that, but give me what I need and I'll leave here a nice guy. If you don't, I'm gonna fuck you up. " Hatcher. Marked For Death
|