Olaf
Posts: 23364
Joined: 26/2/2007 From: 41°N 93°W
|
I was kind of confused about Clichy actually playing well for City last season, he was awful for us in his last season and a half. Still, I'd probably take him as a back-up to Gibbs ahead of Santos (who always seems to need a long run of games to find anything resembling form, which is a bit of a useless trait for a player who needs to come in and fill a gap for a few games). I don't mean to sound like I'm canonising Gibbs or anything, by the way (even though he's completely exceeded my expectations so far this season - I think it might have been Bob I had this discussion with at the start of the season, you were right anyway). It's more that a consistent back four who are familiar with each other positionally was key to our good defensive performances earlier this season, and the lack of it since has been causing issues - thinking specifically of the chaos of our central defence against Chelsea without Mert, and no Gibbs the last two games. I also think Vermaelen's been below-par so far this season, doesn't seem to be concentrating properly and he hasn't successfully judged those big runs forward like he has in the past (and left us more exposed as a result). I would say that our best defence is the one that played against City (Gibbs/Mert/Kos/Jenks) and I'd like to see that more, though it's unlikely since Verm is captain and all.
_____________________________
I tried to groan, Help! Help! But the tone that came out was that of polite conversation. Empire Top 100 Albums Poll 2013: CLICK HERE
|