homersimpson_esq
Posts: 19962
Joined: 30/9/2005 From: Springfield
|
I rewatched QoS the other night. Upon release I was not hugely impressed. BUT, in retrospect, after Skyfall, QoS works. I mean, it really works. As a three-film arc taking us from Bond's beginnings in Casino Royale, through the murky revenge-laden QoS, a grimy, dirty film showing Bond's lowest point, to the majesty of Skyfall and a triumphal return to the Bond of old by the end of Skyfall, it really, really works. It has to be taken in the context of CR and SF, but I have really reappraised QoS. It's not the Bond film we all know and love - it's a film which stars James Bond, and that's the difference. On its own, I agree that it doesn't quite work. But, contextually, in relation to CR, which it is connected to plot-wise it works. And tonally, by contrasting with Skyfall, which is everything you want in a Bond film, it works. QoS is the pain and suffering for which Skyfall provides the catharsis. To emerge into the light you first need to be in the dark. QoS makes Skyfall a better film, and that works the other way as well. I'm going to write more on this when I get the chance, but I've been ticking it over in my mind since I watched QoS the other night, and post-Skyfall it's like watching a different film.
_____________________________
That deep-browed Homer ruled as his demesne. TREK WARS
|