Bryan Cranston Is (Probably) Not Lex Luthor (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie News



Message


Empire Admin -> Bryan Cranston Is (Probably) Not Lex Luthor (3/9/2013 11:05:41 AM)

Post your comments on this article




jservante1 -> More likely to be... (3/9/2013 11:05:41 AM)

Mark Strong. Has good connections with Warner and recently said "watch this space" when asked. Shame, because Cranston would have been a good shout, but he is a little old to be joining a new franchise of films...




Everest95 -> RE: Bryan Cranston Is (Probably) Not Lex Luthor (3/9/2013 12:08:21 PM)

I think it should be Mark Strong, he's already bald and he's a good actor




djdjk -> another option (3/9/2013 2:47:24 PM)

Cranston would be a good Lex Luthor, but I think he'd be an even better Jim Gordon (assuming there will be a Gordon to Affleck's Batman). Lots of people could pull off Luthor.




UTB -> RE: another option (4/9/2013 7:32:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: djdjk

he'd be an even better Jim Gordon


Like it.




jobloffski -> RE: Bryan Cranston Is (Probably) Not Lex Luthor (4/9/2013 11:49:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Everest95

I think it should be Mark Strong, he's already bald and he's a good actor



No. I'm sick of seeing hm play the bad guy in practically EVERYTHING. I'm sick of his voice, a voice which he modulates from one role to the next not at all, making his performances as a bad guy in Green Lantern, Sherlock Holmes, Kick Ass, John Carter and any I may have missed practically identical to each other.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.03125