|
Russ Whitfield -> RE: NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (27/11/2012 11:54:01 AM)
|
Monkey has a really good point here. JGL is a fine actor and the ending of Rises was ace. But if we’re entering a new era, I’m not sure that the same actor should be used… unless it’s “not Bruce Wayne Batman” which will suck balls and we may as well have Electric Superman and Leather Jacket Wonder Woman. OH GOD! Batman is going to be really tough for the JLA movie (if it happens, and I still doubt that it will) because the Nolan/Bale version has to be the definitive take on the character (in movies - but for the record, I thought TDK was pants… ‘Rises was miles better, and ‘Begins was the best of the lot). If we stick with the Dark Knight persona, then it’ll be hard for any actor to take on without being accused of “ripping off” Bale. If is “not Bruce Wayne Batman” that could allow for a new take, but as I say above… really… a JLA movie without the proper Batman might be a pointless exercise: the union of the World’s Greatest Superheroes … and the bloke that took over from Batman doesn’t have a great ring about it. As I type, I think the way it could be handled would be to have a more mature actor in the role and reference some of the Nolan-Verse stuff (like Bond referencing his wife), so we know that it’s Nolan-Verse grumpy-Bats, but not the same actor in the role? Even I as I think it, it’s already tenuous. Batman was best handled by Bruce Timm - in the JLA/JLAU cartoons, he maintained his dour demeanour (transposed from the excellent animated series), but the character in the Justice League was allowed moments of levity - largely because the other characters ripped the piss out of him for being so … dark.
|
|
|
|