|
giggity -> RE: Most ridiculous display of fanboy-ism you've seen? (19/10/2012 5:31:55 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hood_Man We must have different definitions of what a fanboy is, because I don't think of them like that at all. I think of them as the most obsessive and perhaps passionate of fans yes, but it's a term of endearment surely? I think that as annoying as they can sometimes be, they're also wonderful. We wouldn't have Star Trek if it wasn't for fanboys. Or Comic Con. [EDIT] For instance, I think of everyone on this forum as a fanboy. Whether it's a Comic Book Fanboy, a LOTR/Evil Dead Fanboy, a Star Wars Fanboy, or a Fanboy of Film in general. We've all taken the time to sign up to an online community to talk about our love of film, that makes us a minority. Not that I'm disputing what you've experienced giggitty, I just don't think the people you've described are fanboys. They're dicks [:D] I think that we're just very passionate fans, a fanboy is a fan who loves something but they're also ignorant at the same time that if something happens with the property which doesn't exactly gel with how they think the property should be portrayed they throw a massive tantrum or or go on huge childish diatribes about how it's 'wrong' often without sense or an idea of what good film-making is. If it's something that they don't like personally it's wrong. An example of fanboy-ism would be someone who didnt like Daniel Craig because he was blonde, or Harry Knowles review of Dark Knight Rises (his problems with it were it wasn't the Batman he grew up with and liked)
|
|
|
|