Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED?

Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [On Another Note...] >> Off Topic

Message

Your Funny Uncle -> Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 12:26:19 PM)
[image]https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/388774_10152127941015311_303495552_n.jpg[/image]

talpacino -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 1:10:14 PM)
[image]http://imageshack.us/a/img196/6707/led2av.jpg[/image]

Chief -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 1:28:19 PM)
[sm=happy07.gif]

Scott_ -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 1:30:19 PM)
[:D] Amazing.

Your Funny Uncle -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 1:48:34 PM)
[image]http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q195/schneekle/404578_10151197999130117_553040116_22485916_767376480_n-1.jpg[/image]

vad3r -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 1:58:21 PM)
It was only a matter of time really.

ChessWithTheReaper -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 2:00:02 PM)
Is something funny supposed to be occurring here? Or is just a parody of that moronic thread in Knowledge Base which is still inexplicably pinned at the top of that forum like it's a shining beacon of thread that is celebrated on here, despite the fact it's in no way funny or useful. I realise that humour is subjective but I just don't get that one.

DancingClown -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 2:04:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ChessWithTheReaper Is something funny supposed to be occurring here? Or is just a parody of that moronic thread in Knowledge Base which is still inexplicably pinned at the top of that forum like it's a shining beacon of thread that is celebrated on here, despite the fact it's in no way funny or useful. I realise that humour is subjective but I just don't get that one. Thanks for sharing, Mr Alias.

Shifty Bench -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 2:06:01 PM)
looks in thread Hi everyone! realises that it's Thursday Ooh, heck! leaves thread

Hood_Man -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 2:08:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DancingClown quote: ORIGINAL: ChessWithTheReaper Is something funny supposed to be occurring here? Or is just a parody of that moronic thread in Knowledge Base which is still inexplicably pinned at the top of that forum like it's a shining beacon of thread that is celebrated on here, despite the fact it's in no way funny or useful. I realise that humour is subjective but I just don't get that one. Thanks for sharing, Mr Alias. [image]http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/3184/screenshot20120927at140b.png[/image]

Pratt82 -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 2:11:29 PM)
Oh wow.......my own thread. [:D]

ChessWithTheReaper -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 2:13:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DancingClown quote: ORIGINAL: ChessWithTheReaper Is something funny supposed to be occurring here? Or is just a parody of that moronic thread in Knowledge Base which is still inexplicably pinned at the top of that forum like it's a shining beacon of thread that is celebrated on here, despite the fact it's in no way funny or useful. I realise that humour is subjective but I just don't get that one. Thanks for sharing, Mr Alias. Please, don't play the alias card, I've been on this site since 2008, never posted much, just don't get threads like this, especially as they allude to that mentioned thread in knowledge base which serves no purpose, therefore should not be pinned in forum, bad place to make my point so I shall apologise and move along.

Hood_Man -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 2:15:03 PM)
[image]http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/3189/doyouhave.jpg[/image]

DancingClown -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 2:18:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ChessWithTheReaper quote: ORIGINAL: DancingClown quote: ORIGINAL: ChessWithTheReaper Is something funny supposed to be occurring here? Or is just a parody of that moronic thread in Knowledge Base which is still inexplicably pinned at the top of that forum like it's a shining beacon of thread that is celebrated on here, despite the fact it's in no way funny or useful. I realise that humour is subjective but I just don't get that one. Thanks for sharing, Mr Alias. Please, don't play the alias card, I've been on this site since 2008, never posted much, just don't get threads like this, especially as they allude to that mentioned thread in knowledge base which serves no purpose, therefore should not be pinned in forum, bad place to make my point so I shall apologise and move along. Well, that's it, sometimes there are running gags that I don't understand or 'get'. But in the end I don't care enough to comment.

Pratt82 -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 2:29:33 PM)
[image]http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q195/schneekle/Untitled-11.png[/image]

Hobbitonlass -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 2:38:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ChessWithTheReaper Is something funny supposed to be occurring here? Or is just a parody of that moronic thread in Knowledge Base which is still inexplicably pinned at the top of that forum like it's a shining beacon of thread that is celebrated on here, despite the fact it's in no way funny or useful. I realise that humour is subjective but I just don't get that one. My suggestion would be just to ignore threads like these rather than comment on the pointlessness. There are plenty I would love to ignore and I guess a lot of posters do just that. The other one in Knowledge Base was locked a long time ago and I don't know why it was pinned to the top. I have remedied that now.

MonsterCat -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 2:43:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hobbitonlass The other one in Knowledge Base was locked a long time ago and I don't know why it was pinned to the top.� Because it was funny. quote: I have remedied that now. : (

Your Funny Uncle -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 3:23:49 PM)
Can't even have a bit of fun on here these days [:-]

Chief -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 3:24:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hood_Man [image]http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/3189/doyouhave.jpg[/image] BOOM!

Hood_Man -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 3:27:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hobbitonlass quote: ORIGINAL: ChessWithTheReaper Is something funny supposed to be occurring here? Or is just a parody of that moronic thread in Knowledge Base which is still inexplicably pinned at the top of that forum like it's a shining beacon of thread that is celebrated on here, despite the fact it's in no way funny or useful. I realise that humour is subjective but I just don't get that one. My suggestion would be just to ignore threads like these rather than comment on the pointlessness.� There are plenty I would love to ignore and I guess a lot of posters do just that. The other one in Knowledge Base was locked a long time ago and I don't know why it was pinned to the top.� I have remedied that now. I hate the fact that I've got the last post in that thread, as I seem to have had my wrist slapped by a mod [:D] I can't remember what I did to be honest, but it's like a reminder of a time I got told off by a teacher in primary school for licking paint off my hands [:(]

Rgirvan44 -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 3:36:30 PM)
YOU REMOVED THE PIN?!! This is frankly a disgrace.

superdan -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 3:40:10 PM)
I DON'T GET THE JOKE SO WILL EVERYONE PLEASE STOP IT RIGHT NOW.

vad3r -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 3:43:52 PM)
[image]https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/388774_10152127941015311_303495552_n.jpg[/image] Boom, boom, boom Even brighter than the moon, moon, moon It's always been inside of you, you, you And now it's time to let it through-ough-ough

Chief -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 4:00:15 PM)
[sm=happy07.gif] This thread could have legs. Poor MtP

DancingClown -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 4:16:51 PM)
Did ChessWithTheReaper consider 1080p when bumming out thread?

kumar -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 4:39:54 PM)
Always good to see this one rear its ugly head again [:D]

Shifty Bench -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (27/9/2012 4:42:38 PM)
It's a classic [:D]

Pratt82 -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (1/10/2012 8:46:36 AM)
Set up my new 1080p LED lastnight......works brilliantly. [:D]

borstal -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (12/10/2012 3:08:11 PM)
But did you consider?

borstal -> RE: Did Pratt82 consider 1080p when buying LED? (12/10/2012 3:10:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ChessWithTheReaper Is something funny supposed to be occurring here? Or is just a parody of that moronic thread in Knowledge Base which is still inexplicably pinned at the top of that forum like it's a shining beacon of thread that is celebrated on here, despite the fact it's in no way funny or useful. I realise that humour is subjective but I just don't get that one. OK, try and get this!? [image]http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/1476/51049264.jpg[/image]

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.03125